I think I speak for all World Cup fans when I say we deserve much better commentary than this crap from Fox. what am I listening to mann? ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ
#Senegal#Belgium#WorldCup
McLaughlin, the dissent explicitly argued that in order to be subject to the jurisdiction thereof of the US (the key phrase), one needs to be domiciled - something that cannot be established if someone is illegally in the country. Hence, why the children of illegal aliens cannot be citizens.
This isn't hard, bruv
Reminder: no opinion, not even that of Justice Thomas, actually makes a constitutional case that the children of illegal immigrants are not birthright citizens. Alito comes closest. But all the actual evidence cited is on the birth tourism question.
McLaughlin, did you not read the decision?
The dissent explicitly argued that in order to be subject to the jurisdiction thereof of the US (the key phrase), one needs to be domiciled - something that cannot be established if someone is illegally in the country. Hence, why their children cannot be citizens.
What is so hard to comprehend?
Lol these people are seriously trying to convince us that the 19th century framers of the 14th amendment birthright citizenship somehow intended it to extend to the children of 20 million illegal aliens who violated American law and have no business being in our country.
I remain convinced, in the birthright citizenship case, that the children of transients (or birth tourists) case was a close one, but that the majority's decision was just obviously correct as a textual & historical matter on the children of illegal immigrants.
@MattWalshBlog In a proper society, KBJ would be flipping burgers but since we aren't, we're having to listen to her incoherent ramblings on our nation's highest court.
@asj519 Justice Thomas: "the 14th Amendment was meant for free Black slaves, not the children of illegal aliens"
Black Woman: "why does Clarence thomas hate being black?"
You are quite retarded, my friend.