My opinion on magic is the same as my opinion on women with dicks: neither are real. However, if you want to prove me wrong, by all means jump off a roof on a broomstick.
Esas putas del Raval que @galapita @sumar tuvo la desvergüenza de citar en el debate no son blancas catalanetes...son negras, inmigrantes, pobres que fueron violadas y secuestradas para el ejercicio de eso que esta facción vergonzosa de la izquierda llama trabajo. NAJAT EL HACHMI
Pues ante la estupefacción, lo he comprobado y es cierto https://t.co/xrddreIhUD.
Esto es 𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗮𝗰𝗶ó𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘂𝗰𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗱𝗲 𝗹𝗮 𝗽𝗲𝗱𝟬𝗳𝗶𝗜𝗶𝗮. En la línea de las políticas implementadas desde el anterior Ministerio de Igualdad. Recordemos las palabras que hasta en dos ocasiones dijo Irene Montero: «Los niños, niñas y niñes tienen derecho al se×o».
NO. Los niños y niñas NO tienen derecho al se×o. No tienen edad ni capacidad para consentir y cualquier acto de naturaleza se×ual que implique a mayores con niños es vioIencia s3xuaI. Y este debería ser el mensaje institucional. En su lugar, esta infamia. Un 𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘰𝘳, dicen, cometido en demasiadas ocasiones por el anterior y el actual Ministerio de Igualdad.
La alusión al error es insuficiente. Inmediata retirada del cartel, explicación pública de la ministra Ana Redondo y depuración de responsabilidades en el Ministerio de Igualdad.
Basta de campañas y políticas que maItratan a la infancia.
Ninguna criatura merece nacer y ser arrancada de su madre para ser vendida. Nadie debería tener derecho a comprar seres humanos. Pero así es el capitalismo y así es el patriarcado.
You’ve asked me several questions on this thread and accused me of avoiding answering, so here goes.
I believe a woman is a human being who belongs to the sex class that produces large gametes. It’s irrelevant whether or not her gametes have ever been fertilised, whether or not she’s carried a baby to term, irrelevant if she was born with a rare difference of sexual development that makes neither of the above possible, or if she’s aged beyond being able to produce viable eggs. She is a woman and just as much a woman as the others.
I don’t believe a woman is more or less of a woman for having sex with men, women, both or not wanting sex at all. I don’t think a woman is more or less of a woman for having a buzz cut and liking suits and ties, or wearing stilettos and mini dresses, for being black, white or brown, for being six feet tall or a little person, for being kind or cruel, angry or sad, loud or retiring. She isn't more of a woman for featuring in Playboy or being a surrendered wife, nor less of a woman for designing space rockets or taking up boxing. What makes her a woman is the fact of being born in a body that, assuming nothing has gone wrong in her physical development (which, as stated above, still doesn't stop her being a woman), is geared towards producing eggs as opposed to sperm, towards bearing as opposed to begetting children, and irrespective of whether she's done either of those things, or ever wants to.
Womanhood isn't a mystical state of being, nor is it measured by how well one apes sex stereotypes. We are not the creatures either porn or the Bible tell you we are. Femaleness is not, as trans woman Andrea Chu Long wrote, ‘an open mouth, an expectant asshole, blank, blank eyes,’ nor are we God’s afterthought, sprung from Adam’s rib.
Women are provably subject to certain experiences because of our female bodies, including different forms of oppression, depending on the cultures in which we live. When trans activists say 'I thought you didn't want to be defined by your biology,' it’s a feeble and transparent attempt at linguistic sleight of hand. Women don't want to be limited, exploited, punished, or subject to other unjust treatment because of their biology, but our being female is indeed defined by our biology. It's one material fact about us, like having freckles or disliking beetroot, neither of which are representative of our entire beings, either. Women have billions of different personalities and life stories, which have nothing to do with our bodies, although we are likely to have had experiences men don't and can't, because we belong to our sex class.
Some people feel strongly that they should have been, or wish to be seen as, the sex class into which they weren't born. Gender dysphoria is a real and very painful condition and I feel nothing but sympathy for anyone who suffers from it. I want them to be free to dress and present themselves however they like and I want them to have exactly the same rights as every other citizen regarding housing, employment and personal safety. I do not, however, believe that surgeries and cross-sex hormones literally turn a person into the opposite sex, nor do I believe in the idea that each of us has a nebulous ‘gender identity’ that may or might not match our sexed bodies. I believe the ideology that preaches those tenets has caused, and continues to cause, very real harm to vulnerable people.
I am strongly against women's and girls' rights and protections being dismantled to accommodate trans-identified men, for the very simple reason that no study has ever demonstrated that trans-identified men don't have exactly the same pattern of criminality as other men, and because, however they identify, men retain their advantages of speed and strength. In other words, I think the safety and rights of girls and women are more important than those men's desire for validation.
I sincerely hope that answers your questions. You may still disagree, but as I hope this shows, I’m more than happy to have this debate.
El editorial de @el_pais dice que la elección del sexo registral, sin ningún requisitos que lo justifique, es un derecho. Es solo inseguridad jurídica. ¿Por qué autodeterminar el sexo es un derecho y autodtermimar la edad, la discapacidad o un título universitario no lo es?
EXCUSE ME HI I HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY 🙋♀️ I can’t wait to see so many of you on The Eras Tour next year at these new international dates! Visit https://t.co/EYBevxhQzH for more information on your registrations, pre-sales and on-sales!!