@c_h_e_m@Acyn@grok Correct. I’m not so much arguing that as reading what the clause says. It tries hard to LOOK like a normal settlement waiver by using a lot of words referring to identified terms like “Pending Claims” or whatever, but the only reason for that last line “(3)” is blanket immunity.
@c_h_e_m@Acyn@grok No, not by a strict reading of the clause. Which is why all those federal judges wrote a brief about it. The DOJ agreed to release, waive, acquit, etc. all claims that an agency, including EPA, may have to bring a civil action seeking civil penalties against Trump, et al.
@c_h_e_m@Acyn@grok “It doesn't prevent in any way shape or form the FBI to investigate a murder for example, despite what you are trying to claim.” It’s not a CRIMINAL immunity clause, lol! This was a civil action. It’s a civil settlement. It grants blanket civil immunity.
@c_h_e_m@Acyn@grok I hear you, but you’re not correct. It says “currently pending >>or that could be pending<<“ That means anything that has happened that we don’t know about or we haven’t acted on yet; anything that COULD be pending if it were known; anything that had the ability to be pending.
@c_h_e_m@Acyn@grok I’m a lawyer and I know how to read a clause. I tried to make it understandable to lay people like you by using the “…” version. Follow along: The “current pending case” is No. 1, correct? No. 2 is lawfare, right? Now read “in connection with or which arise out of” No. 3.
@c_h_e_m@Acyn@grok You: “Because it certainly doesn't give immunity for any claim for any federal agency in the first place.”
Read the last line - “or other agencies or departments.” It certainly does give immunity for any claims from any federal agency or department.
@Guild_1775@realMaalouf THAT IS NOT THE RUDYARD KIPLING POEM!! That is a version modified and circulated by white nationalists and neo-Nazis. Here is the original:
@Rain4est1337@Acyn Lol, that line in orange just means “up to this date.” Do you think it’s possible to grant immunity for things that haven’t happened yet or something? This is absolutely blanket immunity. Everything they’ve ever done, known or unknown, is now off-limits to every federal agency.
@c_h_e_m@Acyn@grok You and Grok are both wrong. Of course it doesn’t grant immunity for crimes/violations that haven’t occurred yet; no immunity agreement does that. But it gives them immunity from any claim from any federal agency for anything, known or unknown, that they’ve already done.
@ultras_antifaa If you support Gaza against Israel before reading Hamas’ Charter, you’re dangerously naive. If you support Gaza against Israel AFTER reading Hamas’ Charter, you’re a jihadist. 100%.
Please, read it. It won’t take very long. https://t.co/ULvTXwqF6I
A few years ago, the left’s favorite slogan was “hate has no home here.”
Now some of the same people will bend themselves into a pretzel to explain why hatred toward Jews is actually different.
Bill Maher put it bluntly: antisemitism isn’t just tolerated in certain circles anymore. It’s become fashionable.
The irony is almost impressive. The people who built their identity around fighting bigotry somehow found an exception clause.
Turns out the newest Che Guevara T shirt isn’t about sticking it to “the man.”
It’s just hating Jews and calling it activism.
🎥 Watch the clip. Then ask yourself: when did the people who claimed to defend liberal values become so comfortable abandoning them when Jews were involved? 🇺🇸🇮🇱 #BillMaher #Antisemitism #LiberalValues #Israel #JewishPride #Hypocrisy
@horrormuseum Ugh, AI “assuring and confident” mode. Sounds exactly like those videos of ChatGPT not being able to count to 100. “We got this,” “I’m here for you.”
@HenMazzig This is what happens when your friends ghost you for being insufferable and you have nothing to do except wander around large gatherings of people and scream at strangers.
@glenn_tunes@charise_lee I overstated it by implying France isn’t investigating Musk AT ALL for influencing politics. But the referenced criminal investigation isn’t about that, according to the Paris prosecutor.
https://t.co/GqjiLAlZk8
@glenn_tunes@charise_lee Sadly this account has become a wastebin of false info. Unfollowing.
France IS NOT investigating Musk for influencing politics.
“In addition to sexual images of minors, the investigation involves Grok’s dissemination of Holocaust-denial claims and sexually explicit deepfakes.”
@Vetinari3@glenn_tunes@charise_lee Weird. Here’s the article I read and it ends with the list of issues the prosecutor said are the subject of the probe. I think the announced criminal investigation ISN’T about political meddling but it’s getting conflated with other investigations about that France is conducting.