There's no sufficient proof for the first and the second crusades to have happened, finland maintained an ethnicly finnish nobility for centuries, which spoke finnish, there was no systemic linguistic marginalisation, no ethnic cleansing by swedish hands. Reason why finland became apart of sweden was, because in the late 1200's finland was in a period of internal instability between different chiefdoms, and a conflicted progressive/reactionary, christian/pagan elite, and had endured war with the rus' for centuries, for which a military alliance was beneficial for.
You are not enforcing any form of finnish identity, but sowing in a fake, constructed svecoman narrative of swedish dominion and bad finnish self-esteem.
09.04.1917 Kerenski in Tallinn, standing under the nationalist Kalev Sport Association´ insignia with text that reads "Long live Estonia". Estonians had just acquired a national, autonomous governate that united ethnic Estonian territories on 18. March, 1917.
Opening of the 1936 Finno-Ugric Cultural Congress. First speaker the founder and first President of Estonia, Konstantin Päts, second one linguist Julius Mark.
IN MEMORIAM YURI LISOVSKIY 🕯️
The Finno-Ugric scene is shaken by the news of the passing of a beloved etnofuturist Yuri Lisovskiy (11.04.1964 – 16.01.2026). We have lost one of our most original voices.