When a Bitcoin block is confirmed, the certainty of its finality increases exponentially with each subsequent confirmation (block added on top of it).
The same applies to the chances of CFB's involvement with Satoshi Nakamoto. If you add up all "coincidences" shared throughout the years there's just one conclusion possible. CFB was part of Satoshi Nakamoto.
These suspicions are not new, they are there since 2010, but for some reason most people prefer to overlook it. He's not the typical "usual suspect". I suggest all newcomers to this theory to start at the oldest tweet of this account and read all the way up. And consider the tweets of this account are just "part of all available proof".
It's up to CFB to formally reveal himself by a cryptographic signing. Maybe he's waiting for $QUBIC, his so called "final project", to be in a certain state of maturity. Maybe he's dependent on external factors. Or he's waiting for a special moment in time, as we all know he loves cryptographic riddles and numerology.
As he said he'll be doing "one interview" ever, and we might witness it sooner as you expect.
For now let's acknowledge that CFB is responsible for a big part of all cryptocurrency innovations. PoW, PoS, ICOs, Privacy, scaling (DAG), UPoW and AI training, to name a few...
🧠The high IQ plan, the final game of the card under the sleeve
This is not a prediction; it is a decoding of immutable on-chain data. On July 4th, 2025.
$qubic $Aigarth
https://t.co/tmkxZN05Ec
CFB in 2002.
The article proposes a completely free, zero-infrastructure way to run large-scale distributed computing projects over the internet. Instead of expensive servers or supercomputers, it turns ordinary website visitors into a massive volunteer computing network using nothing but a simple HTML page, a free Java applet, and a standard free email account.
This was extremely ahead of its time and remains a remarkably elegant hack:
Pure decentralization with zero servers: Most distributed projects at the time (SETI@home, etc.) required powerful central servers to hand out work and collect results. This design eliminates the central compute server entirely - the email inbox becomes the only coordination point.
SMTP/POP3 as a distributed database: Using ordinary email protocols as a shared, append-only bulletin board for task queuing and result storage was a brilliant, low-cost workaround to Java applet security restrictions (no file access, limited networking). No one else was doing this in 2002.
Invisible, automatic volunteer computing: Users don’t download anything or click “run.” They just visit a page and their CPU helps for free while they browse.
Cross-platform and secure: Java applets were chosen for safety (sandboxed, no destructive actions) and universal compatibility - a big advantage over ActiveX.
Minimal cost philosophy: The entire system runs on free services only. The author explicitly wanted to make high-performance distributed computing accessible to “ordinary Internet users who don’t want to spend money on hosting.”
In modern terms, this is a direct conceptual ancestor of useful Proof of Work (uPoW) and serverless P2P computing: harness idle global hardware for meaningful work, coordinated in a fully decentralized way without expensive infrastructure. The same author (Sergey Ivancheglo / Come-from-Beyond) later applied these exact ideas to Qubic.