With the Eagles loss on Black Friday a Satoshi Sharps Champion is crowned in 2025. Congrats to @grantmanh for surviving with only underdogs to choose from. It turned out great for the slate of games where all 4 underdogs won. Is it fair? No, but it is epic!
Something big is happening in early August. The Satoshi Sharps Survivor Pool goes live for our 5th season. This year we’re doing something different. We are running 2 pools. A Pleb Pool and a Whale Pool. Follow this account to stay tuned for updates. We also have a telegram group. DM for details
It has been brought to our attention that Strategy IS running a node. The irony here is that Saylor is making the error that plebs are often accused of making. Saylor thinks he’s running a node to “support” the network. He’s not running the node to be self-sovereign. Strategy is not using their node in any meaningful way. Not an economic node. The rest of our post was 100% accurate 🏈
Hey Michael, we appreciate your perspective but you don't run a node, nor do you self-custody Bitcoin, nor do you accept Bitcoin for your goods and services. Instead you promote shitcoin scams and tell us node runners and users that spam is no problem. How about you stop listening to scammers like Andy and Bailey and listen to some actual Bitcoiners? We run a BIP110 node and we're using it to run an NFL Survivor Pool. We have more economic impact on the Bitcoin network than you do. So do most businesses that transact in Bitcoin using their own node to verify payments. You're a LARP, you always were
After a decade of blockspace fears and non-monetary-use panics, Bitcoin still has no spam problem. Fees are 1 sat/vB: anyone can move any amount globally with immediate processing for ~$0.30. The free market has always solved Bitcoin’s blockspace challenges. $BTC
It has been brought to our attention that Strategy IS running a node. The irony here is that Saylor is making the error that plebs are often accused of making. Saylor thinks he’s running a node to “support” the network. He’s not running the node to be self-sovereign. Strategy is not using their node in any meaningful way. Not an economic node. The rest of our post was 100% accurate 🏈
Hey Michael, we appreciate your perspective but you don't run a node, nor do you self-custody Bitcoin, nor do you accept Bitcoin for your goods and services. Instead you promote shitcoin scams and tell us node runners and users that spam is no problem. How about you stop listening to scammers like Andy and Bailey and listen to some actual Bitcoiners? We run a BIP110 node and we're using it to run an NFL Survivor Pool. We have more economic impact on the Bitcoin network than you do. So do most businesses that transact in Bitcoin using their own node to verify payments. You're a LARP, you always were
Yes, there's economic support for BIP110. Here's a merchant/miner/treasury company signaling for BIP110. They are not alone. Every node that connects to a wallet and is used to validate blocks is an economic node to some degree.
https://t.co/BjGbTACfzs
@giacomozucco Aaking big companies to pre-approve any changes in Bitcoin is no different than the legacy system. Bitcoin changes are usually grassroots movements by plebs running nodes. Not getting the "ok" from large miners and exchanges is a feature not a bug
Not really possible for us. We ramp up transactions beginning of August as players pay their entry fees for the upcoming NFL season. We will be processing on-chain payments through a BIP110 node.
Avoid transacting during the second week of August until the dust settles and reorg risk subsides (if I’m not overlooking something). I’ll be running both my version of core and knots 110 to observe, keeping sats separate and sidelined.
@crypto_0ptimist Satoshi Sharps has announced they are processing their on-chain transactions through a BIP110 enforcing node. Should be interesting since they ramp up transactions in August in preparation for the NFL season @SatoshiSharps