Saul March

Questions claims and looks for evidence and facts. Skeptical of religious teachers and celebrity worship.
Prefers arguments that hold up under scrutiny.

[Saul March @SaulMarch]

@itslyluuu11 @MJJTruthSeeker @MJTruthSeeker7 @megynkelly @JacquesPeretti @VincentFAmen @waderobsonallys They were offered and turned it down. What went down in those meetings we don’t know for sure. The Chandlers aren’t the first to seek monetary resolutions before police involvement 👇

[Saul March @SaulMarch]

@itslyluuu11 @MJJTruthSeeker @MJTruthSeeker7 @megynkelly @JacquesPeretti @VincentFAmen @waderobsonallys That’s why I included both receipts: Mesereu and from the lawyer who actually handed MJ the settlement papers to sign. Listen to the clip. Acknowledge you were wrong instead of acting like a fool.

[Saul March @SaulMarch]

@itslyluuu11 @MJJTruthSeeker @MJTruthSeeker7 @megynkelly @JacquesPeretti @VincentFAmen @waderobsonallys Lol, MJ’s lawyers disagrees with you: The bulk of the settlement money came from MJ’s own pocket! And even Weinstein used such settlement language in his settlements 👇

[Saul March @SaulMarch]

@itslyluuu11 @MJJTruthSeeker @MJTruthSeeker7 @megynkelly @JacquesPeretti @VincentFAmen @waderobsonallys How convenient, an excuse for everything. Lol. An extortion can only be proven if there is a demand- not mutual negotiation back and forward🤦‍♂️

[Saul March @SaulMarch]

@itslyluuu11 @MJJTruthSeeker @MJTruthSeeker7 @megynkelly @JacquesPeretti @VincentFAmen @waderobsonallys The description was good enough for MJ to immediately go into settlement talks after the strip search. The law enforcement officers aren’t lying. Are you a conspiracy theorist loon?

[Saul March @SaulMarch]

@itslyluuu11 @MJJTruthSeeker @MJTruthSeeker7 @megynkelly @JacquesPeretti @VincentFAmen @waderobsonallys Did MJ report the Chandlers to the police for extortion during this point?

[Saul March @SaulMarch]

@itslyluuu11 @MJJTruthSeeker @MJTruthSeeker7 @megynkelly @JacquesPeretti @VincentFAmen @waderobsonallys If MJ just paid the Chandlers $20 million in August 1993 without putting up any fight it would be career suicide. Because if that information leaked it would be the end for him. So he had to at least pretend he put up a fight first. He knew he was F-ed after the strip-search.

[Saul March @SaulMarch]

there will always be some kind of excuse ready.

But there has to come a point where you simply acknowledge: if it walks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.

[Saul March @SaulMarch]

You are brainwashed and you didn’t step into this discussion to debate or learn anything. You enter these debates and discussions with an unshakable belief in Michael Jackson’s innocence. It’s a complete waste of time, because no matter what we show you, ⬇️

[Saul March @SaulMarch]

Why wouldn’t MJ’s lawyers use these arguments?

[Saul March @SaulMarch]

@cleverage2 @Marcus_Mosher MJ’ team made many silly attempts to delay or in reality get rid of the case: They even requested a delay of up to six years (until the criminal statute of limitations might run), that got rejected. IMO an innocent man didn’t need to fear. They ended up silencing the boy👇

[Saul March @SaulMarch]

@cleverage2 @Marcus_Mosher It’s not surprising that a 12–13-year-old boy could misidentify whether a penis was circumcised. In an erect state, the foreskin is often pulled back, which can make circumcision status difficult to assess, especially for a child with limited knowledge of male anatomy.

[Saul March @SaulMarch]

@cleverage2 @Marcus_Mosher Debunked here 👇⬇️

[MJTruthSeeker @MJJTruthSeeker]

It`s a common misconception (often repeated by fans in online debates) that the grand juries "reviewed the full case and chose not to indict" or "cleared Jackson." In reality, they never got to that stage: the grand juries never got to vote. The grand juries disbanded before reaching that stage. Jordan Chandler never appeared on those grand jury hearings either. They were convened after the settlement, in a time period Jordan gave no assurances he would testify.

So what was the purpose of these grand jury hearings? The two grand juries served a purpose to support the investigation with subpoena power. The grand jury can compel testimony and documents that prosecutors use to build the case. Using a grand jury solely for its investigative subpoena power is standard California law (Penal Code 917 & 939). Sneddon didn't invent this process. You can look it up yourself. MJ-fans have spread so much misinformation. 

The grand juries never got to vote.
No vote on an indictment ever took place. Neither the Santa Barbara County grand jury nor the Los Angeles County grand jury was ever asked by prosecutors to return an indictment (a “true bill”).

According to MJ’s own lawyer they changed laws in California because of the way MJ settled the case - read the way they silenced the victim 👇

[Saul March @SaulMarch]

@cleverage2 @Marcus_Mosher Wake up!👇

[Saul March @SaulMarch]

@J0RDENx33 @mikeyjack07 Tom Mesereau made a mistake. James Safechuck and Laura Primack married in 2008. 3 years after the trial.

[Saul March @SaulMarch]

@musicmadnessme Is this the same book where Frank writes about MJ and him being in bathtub together and Lisa Marie being low-key jealous of the Cascio’s?

[Saul March @SaulMarch]

@MJJRepository Is this the same book where Frank writes about MJ and him being in bathtub together and Lisa Marie being low-key jealous of the Cascio’s?

[Saul March @SaulMarch]

@2BadAboutIt7 @visionary_uce @AmalieB94 @SunshineMJ5 I am proud of you too sweetie

[Saul March @SaulMarch]

@2BadAboutIt7 @visionary_uce @AmalieB94 @SunshineMJ5 Damn, Rox is back. I thought you were on a break. Lol

[Saul March @SaulMarch]

@AmalieB94 @visionary_uce @SunshineMJ5 I am proud of you girls condemning this kind of behaviour 👏👍