🗣️ 'Public trust in planning has declined partly due to the consistent drive to marginalise the voice of the public. Communities are assumed to be incapable of understanding their own best interests – leading to infantile name calling around ‘Nimbys’.' https://t.co/SQVcpLw7j4
Latest Government ideas on planning and nature recovery. It looks as if developers will no longer have to carry out ecological assessments of individual sites. This will be replaced by strategic plans that they can pay into.
https://t.co/R3sWYXQaws
Here is a link to the Governments working paper on development and nature recovery. You can respond by answering questions at the end and adding your own comments
The Government had just produced a new working paper on Development and Nature Recovery. What they are proposing won’t work for sites like Betteshanger Park where a range of protected species are impacted. We will be responding to the expected consultation.
@RSBenwell At Betteshanger Country Park development will result in harm to a range of protected species including Lizard Orchids, Water Voles, Fiery Clearwing moths and removal of open mosaic habitat. An example of where a Nature Restoration Fund just won’t work.
@StevePa46290725 Over 620 Lizard Orchids at Betteshanger Country Park will be dug up from the second largest colony in the UK and ‘translocated’ to make way for a surf lagoon.
@CheshireWT Appalling that a Local Wildlife Site should be threatened in this way. The planning system is facilitating destruction of the natural world. Wildlife doesn’t stand a chance.
Researchers from @sheffielduni visited nearly 6,000 houses across 42 developments , and this is what they found .
Read the summary and/or full version here:
https://t.co/Hu3Mxd0LDE
On a day when house building is in the news, we publish a new report - LOST NATURE.
In it, we asked if housing developers have been delivering their ecological commitments.
Answer: NO.
Read the report here: https://t.co/lOQucjUkNK
1/8
@ffswhy@paulpowlesland At Betteshanger the developer was able to remove ponds where great crested newts were present because he agreed to pay into a district licensing scheme. Even are rarest and most vulnerable species are not protected under the planning system.
@paulpowlesland Great crested newts don’t hold up development even though they are a protected species. Developers can remove newts and their habitat if they pay into a District Licensing scheme for recreation of newt habitat elsewhere.
The latest from Angela Raynor. Bitterly disappointing that the Labour Party appears to be taking an anti wildlife stance when it comes to development. https://t.co/7ytSyLmeTc
The Prime Minister was wrong to blame nature protection & regulators for stopping development🏡
Read our joint letter to @Keir_Starmer calling for an urgent meeting to discuss how #nature & sustainable development can go hand-in-hand👇
https://t.co/pfdtk59dng
📷Cassie Crocker