Sav

[Dr. Maalouf ‏ @realMaalouf]

Syria (Aleppo) in the 1950s, when 40% of the population was Christian. Today, it is less than 1%. This is the case for all the Middle East under Islam. Funny how no one cares about this real genocide.

[Mahyar Tousi @MahyarTousi]

Islamic Republic's striker Mehdi Taremi was somehow allowed to enter the United States despite the fact that not only he is IRGC, he believes that the Jewish nation should be wiped out.

Here is his post supporting Khamenei's claim that Israel would be destroyed by 2042.

[Kosher @koshercockney]

Gave me goosebumps.

Truly powerful and a must watch.

If there’s an AI awards this should definitely be submitted.

It’s by @ifarca - he doesn’t put much of his work on X. So please give him a follow on his Instagram page @ im_ai_gination

[Ahmed Khalifa @_A_khalifa]

Real Middle East problem:
white liberals & leftists who are
madly in love with terrorists.
Absolute dumbasses !!

[Persia❤️ اریایی @roya21042019]

"Mijn man moet bedekt zijn, zodat andere vrouwen geen zonde begaan." 🤌🏻😈😅🙏🏻

[Dr. Maalouf ‏ @realMaalouf]

During the Iranian Revolution, leftist students, communists, and Muslims were all united in overthrowing the Shah.

The leftists celebrated when Khomeini returned in 1979. They thought they defeated capitalism and imperialism. It didn’t last long.

Around 30,000 leftists who helped the Islamic regime consolidate power were soon executed. That’s where the term “useful idiot” comes from.

They served their purpose and were no longer needed. Muslims had always despised their progressive ideals and couldn’t wait to get rid of them.

One of the women celebrating in the picture was killed, the other fled the country for her life.

It’s bizarre that almost 50 years later, Western leftists are making the exact same mistake and allying with Muslims. They will have the same fate.

[Dan Burmawi @DanBurmawy]

The Left and Islam, these two ideologies should be at war, one claims to fight for feminism, LGBTQ rights, secularism, and equality, while the other is rooted in medieval theocracy, submission, and absolute control.

Yet, they’ve formed a perfect symbiotic relationship, using each other for power, influence, and the destruction of Western civilization from within.

For the left, Islam is a weapon.

It is the ultimate tool to dismantle Western values, weaken national identity, and push their own radical agenda.

They don’t care about Islam itself, they exploit it, knowing that the ideology carries a powerful victim narrative that they can weaponize against their political enemies.

The left thrives on oppression narratives.

Islam, with its deep-rooted sense of historical grievance, fits perfectly into the intersectional hierarchy of the “oppressed.”

The left despises Christianity because it upholds traditional morality. But they need a battering ram to dismantle it.

Islam, with its aggressive opposition to Christianity, becomes a convenient ally.

The left knows that Western-educated, patriotic voters won’t buy into their radical agenda.

So they import millions of people from Islamic countries who are more likely to vote for big government, hate Western traditions, and demand “tolerance” while refusing to assimilate.

The more chaos, the better, because a broken society is easier to control.

The left thrives on censorship.

What better way to shut down debate than by labeling any criticism of Islam as “hate speech”?

The left uses Islam as a shield, calling any factual discussion about jihad, sharia, or terrorism “racist.”

But Islam is not a passive tool, it is using the left just as much, if not more.

While the left believes it is controlling Islam, Islam is infiltrating and manipulating the left to expand its dominance.

Islamic jihadists understand that they don’t need a military conquest to take over the West, they just need to infiltrate.

With leftist backing, they gain positions in politics, media, academia, and law enforcement, where they can quietly reshape policy in their favor.

The left’s obsession with open borders and unrestricted immigration is Islam’s golden ticket.

Once a Muslim population reaches a critical mass, it doesn’t assimilate, it dominates.

London, Paris, and Sweden’s no-go zones are the results of Islam using democracy to establish enclaves where sharia law reigns supreme.

Islamic jihadists have learned to disguise their theocratic ambitions under the language of human rights.

They attach themselves to LGBTQ movements, feminist causes, and racial justice protests, even though Islam itself stands against everything these groups claim to support.

It’s a calculated move, gain leftist support, then turn against them when power is secured.

The left believes it can control Islam.

But history shows that every time Islam allies with a non-Islamic force, it ultimately turns against its so-called allies.

The communists in Iran learned this the hard way when they helped overthrow the Shah in 1979, only to be executed en masse by the same Islamic jihadists they had supported.

The same fate awaits the left.

Radical feminists think they’re empowering women, until they’re forced into hijabs.

LGBTQ activists think they’re fighting for equality, until they’re thrown off rooftops.

Socialists think they’re creating utopia, until they find themselves living under the Caliphate.

Islam is not here to be anyone’s pawn. It is here to conquer. And the left, in its blind hatred of the West, is paving the way for its own destruction.

[Malala Yousafzai @Malala]

The EU has invited Taliban officials to Brussels to discuss a migration deal — and today I am shaken and deeply disturbed by this.

This is the same Taliban that banned girls from secondary schools and forced them into marriage. The same Taliban that, earlier this month, arrested dozens of women in Herat for how they were dressed. The same Taliban that detains, beats and executes women who dare to speak out or break their rules.

Through its system of gender apartheid, the Taliban have erased women and girls from public life. Europe must not legitimise a regime responsible for one of the worst human rights crises in the world.

Any engagement with the Taliban must begin and end with the rights of Afghan women and girls.

[Goldie Ghamari | گلسا قمری 🇮🇷 @gghamari]

I have to agree with Amjad here.

Those of us from the middle east understand how these things work. We all see the snub.

This is what happens when western politicians treat Islamic terrorists like normal, rational state actors.

Not a good look for the United States.

[Aɴᴛ @AntSpeaks]

Islamist politician in Britain closing off his speech with "Allahu Akbar"

If you think "well that just means God is the greatest" then you're part of the problem.

It signals Islamist triumph and cultural conquest, not innocent piety. Context matters.

[Ida Turan 🇮🇷 ایده توران @iranidaturan]

Trump is literally cooking the Islamic regime from the inside, and today we witnessed yet another public crack in the system.

Most people are completely fixated on this MoU, treating it as the main story. In reality, it is largely just a pretext, a tool being used to advance much deeper games. The real game playing out is something else entirely, and people should be looking elsewhere to understand what’s truly happening.

Few days ago, one faction of the regime’s gangsters has been faking letters supposedly from Mojtaba Khamenei to claim that negotiations with the US were personally approved by him. Others quickly learned the trick and started playing the same game.

Today, one of the rivals claimed they have access to Mojtaba’s confidential letters with the current negotiating team. It turned into a full-blown public shitshow. Honestly, it was both ridiculous and entertaining. The pigs are turning on each other.

Let me lay out the full picture for you.
Khamenei, to coup-proof his rule, massively empowered the IRGC and turned it into a powerful state-within-a-state. But then he became afraid of his own creation, so he deliberately prevented power from concentrating in any single hand and allowed different competing cartels to form inside the IRGC.

Most of the top figures in these cartels are deeply corrupt, ideology is just a facade for them.

At the same time, he personally cultivated a loyal base from the poorest and most broken layers of society: fanatical, powerless people who were extremely loyal to him personally and would attack anyone on his command like rabid dogs.

After his death, the IRGC clearly took full control of the country, but they are far from united. They’re now openly fighting each other for the real seat of power.

Trump, with his deal-making style and the huge carrot of money, especially after the naval blockade pushed them into real poverty and begging, has brilliantly pushed these corrupt elements forward.

This has created open clashes with the more ideological factions. One of these hardliner cartels belongs to Saeed Jalili and includes figures like the cleric Mahmoud Nabavian, a sitting MP.

Today, Nabavian went on state TV and announced he wanted to reveal Mojtaba Khamenei’s confidential letters criticizing the negotiating team and the current deal. He started reading them live, but they cut him off mid-sentence. The network later called it a serious violation, announced legal action, and even one of the directors resigned and was rebuked.

This was their last desperate attempt to stop the negotiating team from reaching Geneva. But it failed. Just hours later, the other side, Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf and his crew, still made it to Geneva.

A few days ago, they even put the approval of this Memorandum of Understanding to a vote in the Supreme National Security Council. Everyone approved it except one person, and many believe that lone dissenter was Saeed Jalili, from the same cartel as Nabavian.

Meanwhile, another IRGC cartel, Khatam al-Anbiya Headquarters, tried to sabotage the surrenderist negotiators’ trip to Geneva by claiming they had closed the Strait of Hormuz. CENTCOM immediately clapped back and said the Strait is wide open (and ships are moving freely). Perfect own-goal.

Trump knows exactly what he’s doing. He understands these animals better than anyone. He’s weakening the regime from within, without firing a single shot. Just as he predicted, as soon as the corrupt ones smelled real money, they sold out the entire regime and its ideology without hesitation.

Let the man cook, trust the process.

[Dan Burmawi @DanBurmawy]

Spain scored three goals against Saudi Arabia in the first twenty minutes of the game.

Saudi Arabia poured in fortunes and did everything possible to build a competitive team, yet nothing changed. They lost 7-0 a decade ago, and they’re losing big to Spain today.

Nearly every Arab team lost big this World Cup, as they have in almost every World Cup, the lone exception being Morocco, whose players overwhelmingly come up through European clubs.

But why?

The reason isn’t a lack of resources. It’s a lack of excellence.

Islam builds an appearance-based culture. Your worth is tied not to what you are, but to how you perform the role in front of others.

In this system, appearance outranks substance every time.

A known prostitute in a hijab survives public judgment better than a decent woman without one.

A known pedophile who knows how to hide is more respectable than a homosexual who comes out.

A criminal who is publicly obedient to the commandments of the religion outranks a decent human being who simply isn’t religious.

So whatever you build in this culture, you build for the appearance of it.

You invest in the surface without grasping that underneath every real achievement lies a vast architecture of substance the surface is supposed to rest on.

That’s why you can hire the best coach, build the finest stadiums, pay the highest wages, and still lose, every time.

Because your players are the product of a culture that gives the minimum required to look the part, never the maximum regardless of outcome.

A culture saturated with a religion that demands the minimum to avoid punishment, rather than the maximum regardless of reward, will produce the same result in every field.

That is the danger Islam brings to the West.

It is a cultural disease that kills excellence slowly, hollowing out a civilization until nothing genuine is left beneath the surface.

[Dan Burmawi @DanBurmawy]

Islam’s ultimate goal isn’t the salvation of the individual, that would make it a religion.

Its goal is a global government that uses individuals seeking salvation to build it. That is what a political ideology is.

[Mark Dubowitz @mdubowitz]

I can write 100,000 words and give 1,000 interviews trying to explain this and then @TheBabylonBee nails it with 11 words.

[Dan Burmawi @DanBurmawy]

The Palestinians, or Muslims in general, don't necessarily want to wipe the Jewish people off the map or kill them. That was never the original aim, the killing is something Muslims are to carry out at the end of times, according to Muhammad. What they want, for now, is for the Jewish people to live as second-class citizens under an Islamic state, submitting to Islamic supremacy, just as the Christians do in Egypt or Jordan. But because the Jews rejected that subjugation from the beginning and insisted on their sovereignty, killing them became, according to Sharia, the religious mandate.

[Goldie Ghamari | گلسا قمری 🇮🇷 @gghamari]

I agree

[Captain Allen @CptAllenHistory]

The naive fantasy of a single Arab-majority state “from the river to the sea” treating Jews as equal citizens has always been historical illiteracy.

In 1937 — long before Israel existed — the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem told the British Peel Commission that if Arabs received the entire land, the 400,000 Jews there would face “liquidation of the Jewish problem in an unpleasant way.”

For 1,300 years under Arab and Muslim rule, Jews lived as dhimmis — tolerated second-class subjects forced to pay the jizya tax, barred from full legal equality, restricted in worship and residence, and subject to periodic massacres and expulsions.

No Arab country in history ever granted its native Jewish population full and lasting equality as citizens.

The alternative to Jewish sovereignty was never peaceful coexistence.

It was subjugation, expulsion, or annihilation.

[Dan Burmawi @DanBurmawy]

Spain or Egypt?

Both were conquered by Islamic armies. Both were centers of rich, pre-Islamic civilization. But only one reclaimed its soul.

For nearly 800 years, Spain lived under Islamic rule. But the Spanish people never accepted it as final.

Through centuries of resistance, revolts, and the unrelenting Reconquista, Spain eventually drove out the occupiers. Spain reclaimed its civilizational integrity.

Today, Spain is a Western, secular, democratic state. The Spanish language, Christian heritage, and European identity were not erased. 

Egypt, on the other hand, the cradle of one of humanity’s oldest civilizations, a land of pharaohs, hieroglyphs, libraries, and monotheism before Islam ever appeared, was invaded in the 7th century.

The Coptic Christian majority had no organized defense. The result was that Islam absorbed Egypt’s identity. Arabic replaced Coptic. Mosques replaced temples and churches. 

Over generations, the Egyptian mind was colonized spiritually and linguistically, until the population no longer remembered what it had lost.

Today, Egypt is an Islamic republic. Less than 10% of Egyptians remain Christian, persecuted in the land where their faith once thrived.

Unlike Spain, Egypt didn’t fight for its cultural survival. It adapted, assimilated, and submitted.

This is more than a history lesson. It’s a mirror held up to the West today.

In the face of Islamic expansionism, not by sword, but through ideological power, mass migration, legal agitation, and cultural intimidation, Western nations must decide:

Will you be Spain or Egypt?