💥NEPHEW of murdered 60y/o Van Viet Truong slams the Victorian Government. "You say adult time adult crime, well ****** do it."
We stand with you Truong family.♥️
Why aren't Victoria Police protesting in outrage? What a disgrace!
"Someone" is so afraid of this peer-reviewed paper's conclusions that they have resorted to DOS attacks to keep it from being read. The reason? It explores the hypothesis that the spike protein produced by the mRNA jab contributes to cancer. It would be a shame if it went viral
This is false as stated. Only search engines with an account system must age-verify in Oz .
We at @Brave oppose this fig-leaf for govt doxxing/banning/prosecuting-crimethink.
Happily Brave Search has no login at all. We do not profile you. So we are not required to age-verify.
🚨 Here is the full 42 minutes of my crew and I exposing Minnesota fraud, this might be my most important work yet. We uncovered over $110,000,000 in ONE day. Like it and share it around like wildfire! Its time to hold these corrupt politicians and fraudsters accountable
We ALL work way too hard and pay too much in taxes for this to be happening, the fraud must be stopped.
In case you're interested and have got this far, I'm going to explain how this scam works.
The main players are Jane Ruby, Sasha Latypova and Mike Yeadon.
These are their roles...
Jane Ruby (who committed fraud to bring opioids to children and was involved in the Endopharma scam - see https://t.co/jfMt6XPmhC and https://t.co/v9B7WxlfZj) pushes out crazy 5G-nanobot-style fake news stories that are lapped up by dissidents. The purpose of those stories is to make people who are concerned about pharma safety (e.g. "antivaxxers") look crazy and/or lacking in discernment. The stories always have an element of truth (e.g. graphene can be made to self assemble, but it's nothing to do with COVID jabs). She started with Stew Peters and now runs her own show bringing on overtly crazy people - as well as her marks (those whom she is buttering up). That taints the mark early on.
Sasha also fluffs (butters up, sucks up to) more credible scientists earmarked for targeting (those that are credible, are producing papers or revealing too much information in a credible manner). If they respond well to her approaches they are in the game. If they don't respond with awe and sycophancy (e.g. people like @RWMaloneMD, @JesslovesMJK, @Fynnderella1 and me) they are marked for discrediting and harassment - which is why you see constant attacks on people like Malone (e.g. #sashagate).
The ones that entertain her advances then become the subject for discrediting. For example the attempt to undermine @naomirwolf and @jathorpmfm outlined here (https://t.co/Z0GPsmMFz0). Sasha has a strong network of aides and supporters who either didn't vet her inextricable links to pharma (through the Karolinska institute, Pfizer and family ties to the Boston Consulting Group) or turn a blind eye.
Sasha is smart and has been playing the PR game for a long time, so even if our scientist mark is genuine they won't know what's going on. The roles of these agents are overtly outlined in IC dogma - it's called MICE (money, ideology, coercion, ego) and you can read all about it here:
https://t.co/eSwn2m4kwh
Many of the marks targeted for fluffing ("ego") will be people who haven't achieved very much (e.g. in the field of medical research) and are being fed followers on the basis of their "new finding" that is easily rebutted or discredited by the mainstream, but is allowed to fly on social media because it looks crazy (e.g. spoons sticking to heads from 2021). That reinforces to them that they have something interesting and they believe they are right. It's fake, but the mark enjoys the attention and keeps going.
Mike Yeadon's role is to act as pharma's white knight and a pied piper a the same time. The "Ex-Pfizer CEO" (an exaggeration but nobody will bother checking it). It's a sophisticated role, running as "I'm going to expose the dirt on Pfizer" but never does. Instead his real role was to run a useless offshoot company sold for hundreds of millions of dollars through a subsidiary in the Cayman Islands. Why? Because if pharma want to pay off doctors as well as hundreds or thousands of social media influencers and harassment trolls they need money. And that money can't come from inside the US, because it's regulated. So they buy a worthless company (e.g. Ziarco - see #Ziarcogate) for hundreds of millions of dollars into a Cayman Islands fund, dump it after a year as a tax write off and then use the money from the Caymans to run their networks, with no questions asked.
I know you won't believe that story so please feel free to read the fully referenced and amazingly laid out story here: https://t.co/YkVoWXngQz
A pied piper is someone who recruits lots of (usually dissident) followers and then takes them down a waste of time path. It's yet another method of managing influence copied from the intel community. Mike gained his following promising to dob on Pfizer (but never did) and once he was there, used it to come up with easily debunked and discredited stories about syncytin-1, non-existent respiratory viruses and ivermectin causing worldwide infertility (except in Africa where it's widely available, obviously). So not only do his followers get to be tarred with the "crazy brush" but the stories themselves are used to show to the world that "those crazy anti-science people got it wrong again". Here, for example was the "no syncytin-1 is not in the jabs therefore the jabs must be safe in pregnancy" claim easily sold to the world thanks to Mike's made-up story (see here: https://t.co/KjZDe8meSd and worse here https://t.co/pVKdO3cbVD).
In fact the syncytin-1 fake story was so bad that it was probably the number 1 reason that the government were able to force pregnant women to take the COVID vaccine - and just to ram this point home along came our #Yalegate (non)-friends to kill off the "we are worried about giving novel mRNA therapy in pregnancy" fears specifically debunking Mike's fake syncytin-1 story. I guess that's what a few million dollars in pharma funding buys you, here: https://t.co/QXaMu6qsDb
So between them, these people - all of whom are either still working for pharma or appear have made deals with pharma or the DOJ - are used to target and discredit their marks.
And to finish off the job they then get themselves involved with legal cases that are either:
▶️bound to fail (see here https://t.co/xYCb7kN1Oo) - vexatious litigation to stop other people filing credible cases in the same area of law -
or
▶️ made to fail (see the Netherlands court case where non-experts in biological warfare such as Latypova, Yeadon and the psychologist Joe Sansone attempted to derail a legal case against Pfizer and Bill Gates with ridiculous "bioweapons" language that was laughed out of court - see here https://t.co/VhbxAwAXdf)
And that's the game - it's all about discrediting credible voices and it's been a textbook play of pharma for decades, enshrined in law in the Vioxx scandal (see here https://t.co/Lrg6haorNO).
To be clear, some of those now involved are themselves victims of the scam but continue to play along presumably out of embarrassment at having been hoodwinked by the "yeah I used to work for pharma but now I'm your friend" line.
That doesn't give them the right to attack harass and threaten me or any of the other good people fighting for the truth in this pharma shit show.
They need to stop.
For the rest of us who want truth in science and medicine to be restored, please practice some discernment. If something sounds extreme perhaps escape the social media chamber and ask your normie neighbour what it sounds like to them. And then consider if you are being set up.
The "ex-pharma" sycophant who offers you gold and praise is not your friend.
Please don't shoot the messenger (again).
@Fynnderella1@JesslovesMJK@JesseMatchey@P_McCulloughMD@FosterCoulson@ThomasWelch15@RefugeOfSinner5@DravenS17@TonyNikolic10@MaryanneDemasi@DrJulieSladden@BrokenTruthTV@canceledmouse@SenRonJohnson@BlackTomThePyr8@RepThomasMassie@SciGuardians@missyTHX1138
@teniscat@HamburgerPatch@STRAUSS_NFT@ABridgen The body was already producing the vax spike in a completely uncontrolled fashion by then, so the question is, how do you rule out that it wasnt the vax spike that hospitalised and potentially caused their death?
@teniscat@STRAUSS_NFT@ABridgen Remember people were classified as unvaxxed if they havent had the two doses.
There were all sorts of classification tricks being played if you bothered looking carefully.
@Glinner We all got here through a deep dive on different issues afflicting our modern society, and all ended up concluding the modern left is retarded.
Funny that.
@esjesjesj It's how compounding works. Exponential growth, a natural phenomenon observed in all living things, is something you are calling evil?
Stop exposing your retardation.
@AmeliaBee7 Why do low information lefties like you always blame the "murdoch" media?
Look at the responses to your post.
Perhaps people just smell ALP's bullshit because it stinks?
@Andromedans Interesting choice of words.
"outspoken views"
At least the MSM is admitting that having a different opinion is now a fireable offense.
Free speech is dead.
@MikeCarlton01 This kind of imbecilic thinking ends up taxing the upper middle class to pay for everyone else, thereby killing any aspirational upwards mobility.
The real ultra wealthy has ways to get money out of the country before the grubs like you can get your paws on it.