@pudbugget@ChampForza@Acyn I’d say a Federal Magistrate Judge appointed by Trump can safely be called “neutral” in this circumstance:
https://t.co/vJwLbWsamS
@johnrich There is nothing unlawful or unconstitutional about duely authorized members of Law Enforcement serving a search warrant that issued upon probable cause after review by a neutral judicial arbiter upon a citizen of the United States. That’s basic 4th Amendment law. You get that?
@johnrich There is nothing unlawful or unconstitutional about duely authorized members of Law Enforcement serving a search warrant that issued upon probable cause after review by a neutral judicial arbiter upon a citizen of the United States. That’s basic 4th Amendment law. You get that?
@RonFilipkowski There is nothing unlawful or unconstitutional about duely authorized members of Law Enforcement serving a search warrant that issued upon probable cause after review by a neutral judicial arbiter upon a citizen of the United States. That’s basic 4th Amendment law. Fuck Gorka.
@WalshFreedom Trump is unworthy of anyone’s support and people pissed about an American citizen being properly served with a search warrant that issued upon probable cause after review by a neutral judicial arbiter are placing party above country.
@BenCollins1776 The losing one term former President who lives in Florida and loves the Russian dictator… will not share the warrant because he know it was properly authorized.
@BBCWorld There is nothing unlawful or unconstitutional about duely authorized members of Law Enforcement serving a search warrant that issued upon probable cause after review by a neutral judicial arbiter upon a citizen of the United States. That’s basic 4th Amendment law.