@_LunarBird_@Vitus_oss First off you'll have to explain to me how a child dying of cancer was brought about by mans free will. But more to the crux of the issue, He understood what would happen if he created man with free will yet he still did it.
@ChaosBall1977 I love brendan donovan and was very much in favor of the trade, but it irked me when ppl kept saying he was a good fit for the ballpark since his game isn't power dependent
@MarinersSteve Not a bad plan. I would like to get a look at Brennan Davis at some point this year tho too. If the club feels like Pareda's recent success is indicative of who he really is, I could see them going with a plan like you suggest and seeing if either he or Garver regress.
@Simmulator117@Howlingmutant0@nypost@AndrewQuackson Reasonable assumption but there's good (non-woke) reporting on a lot of these groups and they are well regulated and have extremely strict requirements to be a part of them. If it reduces the chances that children would be abused it seems bizarre to oppose those efforts.
@cboyack I consider myself a moderate libertarian but I also don't think you can derive an 'ought' from an 'is'. And im not so psychotic as to deny that lifeboat type scenarios tug at my moral intuitions.
@cboyack But that is a challenge to all political systems except market anarchism. The best answer is that, in the last analysis, self ownership is a principle which is not an automatic defeater for all other moral principles in all circumstances.
@wibblewibble1@Howlingmutant0@nypost@AndrewQuackson What if they never act on it in any way including never consuming CP? I mean they didn't choose to have that attraction... the moment they act on it in any capacity all bets are off but just the attraction??? its basically the luck of the draw
@DarrenTrain Right. If I'm correct i think obstruction is only possible in the very particular situation of a fielder blocking a lane at a base on a play at a base when it isnt the ball itself pulling the fielder into an obstructive position