@seedaproblemis@ManuWayy Hey, I think it’s important to give this kid credit, he handled it and hopefully went about his day and had fun.
Young guy like that doesn’t need to spend his day having a Constitutional stress test with the cops…or worse
@derekchichi@ManuWayy Yeah the police treat every report of
gun/shooting threat as credible.
My point, the kid handled it well, hopefully he had a good day after that.
My point is the person making the report is in the wrong here but the kid handled it the right way.
Totally agree, people should be held accountable for false reporting but it’s the way it is now, err on the side of caution.
My kids call it ‘swatting’.
Kids call in a report on a fellow student and a bunch of police show up to the kids house.
@ManuWayy This is on the person who said he had a gun.
If the police get a credible report of a firearm they have to check.
Personally I think he handled it the right way, got it over with without escalating it.
Very very different; a surveillance camera does not exhibit individual intent.
It’s not only weird, it’s rude.
if someone requests you stop intentionally filming them and you continue it borders on harassment.
Doing this to customers is sabotaging someone’s livelihood.
The only purpose of this is to provoke.
This idiot is not exercising their rights they are abusing them
@Dogfoodlid187bn@Breaking57 There’s no 2 ways about it. A stranger intentionally filming you without explanation is antagonistic. The people with the cameras know this, that’s why they do it.
The motive isn’t freedom it’s chaos.
@Dogfoodlid187bn@Breaking57 major difference:
Individual Intent.
Is there no difference between getting caught in the rain and someone spraying you with a hose?
@eMTBrides I think maturity is using reason over emotions. That’s why many seemingly kind choices have devastating consequences, especially from a government policy or parenting perspective.
If you abuse our rights, in this case, to disrupt someone’s livelihood you’ve crossed the line. It can easily be argued that this person is harassing potential customers and damaging the store owner’s business.
There’s a BIG difference between a surveillance camera and an individual intentionally pointing a camera at someone.
It’s call individual intent.
Getting caught in the rain vs someone spraying you with a hose.
@Slack_Tide_@Breaking57 Educating idiots to harass and antagonize.
It’s an abuse of our rights and it undermines our rights, either intentionally or ignorantly.
That’s absurd, the Constitution is the framework of our judicial system it’s not a policing handbook.
The reality is often one person’s‘freedoms’ infringes another person’s rights and the laws have evolved because of this.
When someone files a complaint against you the police are compelled to respond, how someone handles that response matters, it’s not a Constitutional issue.
@kiddkainmusic Yeah, you see a ‘palm gun’ in this video but all the people who were actually standing right next to him didn’t see or hear anything.
You’ve watched too many Mission Impossible movies