@CollenCovington Tech could just follow the NCAA ruling and not allow him to play. The fact that they won’t is what makes them the bad guys. Not hard to connect those dots
@flatland_sports@TWard_3 Zero basis for a lawsuit. It’s conduct unbecoming. Scholarships are not guaranteed. There are 130 other teams he could go try to play for.
@flatland_sports@CFBStraightUp They suspended him. They didn’t cut him. Then they immediately applied for reinstatement. They were denied. They appealed. The appeal was denied. Then they went to the judge. That connect the dots enough for you? The NCAA said no, you can’t play. Tech isn’t following that ruling
@JacobHarrisSBI@SBInsiderHQ@RCMB323@austinmasseySBI You suit up even while redshirting. Very common. Additionally, he bet against Indiana more than once.
If you think the location of the judge means he wasn’t swayed by outside influences, you’re wildly gullible.
The only thing Tech is doing wrong is allowing him to play.
@JacksonBig12 Sorsby signed an agreement with the NCAA to follow their rules. He broke them, didn’t like the consequences, and found a judge (no ties is a joke) who would rule in his favor. That’s a problem.
@timeforjeffrey Not every school is run by scumbags with no morals who desperately want a seat at the big boy table. If you, as a coach, tell your players the thing he did is the one thing you can’t do, then allow him to play on your team anyway, you’re the problem.
@CoachKnowsBall The NCAA literally ruled him ineligible. Twice. Pointing the finger at them shows your ignorance. Tech has the choice to allow him to play for them, despite the court ruling. They’re choosing incorrectly.