@grok@Moot22514778@tsidpod@grok If you were the lead investigator of this crime, would there be any evidence based on DNA, Texts, or other forensics (for example caliber of the weapon that killed Charlie Kirk) that would challenge you to question beyond a reasonable doubt Tyler Robinsons guilt?
Apparently, Gavin Newsom is now asking election officials to count ballots FASTER to prevent "election lies from taking hold." Wait... who gave Newsom the power to declare that QUESTIONING whether fraud is happening is an "election lie?"
Especially when his allies just passed a provision that tells election observers they CAN'T challenge signatures on the ballots they’re watching get counted.
Newsom didn’t criminalize your doubt. He did something quieter. He turned down the lights in the room where the counting happens and declared that it’s a conspiracy theory to ask why it got so dark.
No government should be the arbiter of truth, EVER. Especially when the question on the table is about the government itself. You cannot let the accused run the evidence room. But for Newsom, he believes the evidence room is his.
AOC called Charlie Kirk’s rhetoric ignorant, while making an ignorant statement.
She also misrepresented what Charlie said about the Civil Rights Act.
We can’t keep doing this - it’s putting people in danger.
Just repost this on any leftest post crying about Jimmy Kimmel it should shut them up. It won’t but at least it shows how much this is all just an act, fake outrage, they are beyond pathetic. This is a very fun watch.
A US Marine restrained an aggressive lunatic on the train, and there was national outrage in the media for weeks.
A career criminal brutally murders a girl minding her own business on the train, and if we didn't have X, we wouldn’t even know about it.
Radicalizing.