It's time to make your Mark on Scroll!
Scroll's loyalty program kicks off with Session Zero. Obtain Marks by
bridging assets to Scroll.
https://t.co/WPUsPM8TO8
Recently,NFT on Solana has become popular again. NFT in the Ethereum ecosystem and NFT in the Solana ecosystem were like two isolated islands. An interesting question,Can NFTscriptions serve as a bridge linking NFTs in the two ecosystems?
The inscription market needs innovation. NFT and inscriptions are a perfect combination. "Smart inscription" is one of the directions.
Salute @MoveScriptions @mrc20app $MOVE
NFTscriptionsV0.1 is online!
Now you can mint $Nfts and view the holdings and mint progress.More features coming soon
https://t.co/L2AIvMfTQq
#Inscriptions#BRC20#solmap
More and more "inscriptions" on Evm.Such as #eths#INS20
The core is composed of transaction-data + index. A big difference from the Bitcoin ecosystem is that Ethereum is more diversified, so there will be more "inscription" scenes on Ethereum
Inscription+NFT has great potential
We recommend @AkordTeam to save files
1/After uploading the image to akord, click the "Details"
2/Please copy the link on @ArweaveEco, this link will exist forever
3/Then visit scrollmap, fill in the link and click update. This link will be recorded on the scroll.
Scrollmap is a fully on chain experiment and has no servers, so it will exist forever.If you own a Scrollmap NFT, you can set a jump link and a file (image) link.Both links will be saved directly on-chain. For image link content, I recommend Arweave.
NFTscriptionsV0.1 is online!
Now you can mint $Nfts and view the holdings and mint progress.More features coming soon
https://t.co/L2AIvMfTQq
#Inscriptions#BRC20#solmap
We support Ethscriptions. People are naturally hostile to the inscriptions on EVMs. The principle of indexing is on-chain data and off-chain calculation, which is similar to the principle of rollup. Can you say that rollup is counter-intuitive?
You can’t make this up: Etherscan finds Ethscriptions “counter-intuitive” because we rely on indexers.
I’m curious to hear Etherscan’s analysis of their own product! It’s an indexer everyone in Ethereum relies on. Is this counter-intuitive?
The inscription is a tag on the chain, which will generate special value when combined with NFT. What do you think of erc6551? 6551 is like binding a smart contract to NFT, and NFTscriptions is like binding onchain tag to NFT. @0xCygaar@dumbnamenumbers
Inscriptions also feel like taking a step backwards. The EVM was designed to support smart contract logic, inscriptions instead move all the computation off-chain.
This leads to more fragmentation and trust in indexers. There's also basically 0 composability with inscriptions.
Yesterday's major Arbitrum outage highlights the risk inherent in centralized sequencers. Such sequencers are dangerous when L2 operators strive to keep them on, and even more dangerous when they engage in active censorship.
The L2 ecosystem treats censorship resistance as a "nice to have." First amass billions in TVL, then figure out the censorship issue.
But censorship resistance is a core feature of Ethereum, not an "add-on." It should be the cornerstone of any scaling solution, not an afterthought.
This is why we built @0xFacet, a scaling solution that cannot be censored or shut off by anyone ever. At first glance, Facet's approach might seem counter-intuitive, but it gets the big picture right. By prioritizing anti-censorship from the outset, we lay a foundation on which other features can be built.
Does forced inclusion solve the L2 censorship issue?
Forced inclusion allows users to circumvent the sequencer and directly submit transactions. However, there are drawbacks: these transactions are subject to a one-day delay and incur higher costs compared to regular L2 transactions. Its effectiveness in real-world scenarios remains untested and uncertain.
We view this as insufficient. On Facet, all transactions are "force included" at the same low cost.
Can't the Facet Indexer go down?
The Facet VM can indeed go down. But this doesn't mean the Facet Protocol is down.
It simply means a temporary reduction in the protocol's state visibility, akin to the inconvenience users face when Etherscan goes offline. Just as Ethereum remains operational without Etherscan, so does the Facet Protocol when the VM goes down. If Etherscan or any other indexer is down often, competitors will emerge to fill the gap.
Isn't it ironic that inscriptions caused the Arbitrum outage and yet you're proposing an inscriptions-based solution to scalability? If we just got rid of inscriptions entirely we would be fine!
Inscriptions have the potential to revolutionize how we use blockchains. It should not be surprising that such technology has many applications and high usage!
Is there a Medium article about Facet?
Why yes!
https://t.co/txLzz11B37
Recently,NFT on Solana has become popular again. NFT in the Ethereum ecosystem and NFT in the Solana ecosystem were like two isolated islands. An interesting question,Can NFTscriptions serve as a bridge linking NFTs in the two ecosystems?