Dr DoGood

Vet, Christian. Wisdom doesn’t ask what you know nor learned. Only what you Seek, and if you’ve found it. Students of Eternal Thought You’ll Never Walk Alone

[Dr DoGood @SeanK7YNWA]

Without pain there can be no strength, no courage, no bravery, no perseverance.

Only through Perseverance does Character form. The Will hardens. The Mind Sharpens.

Only through Pain can we find the Reason in Justice. The Courage to Rise. To Form the Lion within the Will that can mold a better tomorrow through the best of Virtue that God has set within us.

Only through Pain, through Suffering, through Failure can we Endure and rise the man able to walk through the door to create a humanity worthy of His Creation.

A Lion knows even their silence screams. All Lions have Scars. A Lesson we forget in our endless desire for comfort and safety that do nothing but weaken our resolve.

[Dr DoGood @SeanK7YNWA]

@TomiLahren The retort against the MLB thinking it can penalize these players when they violated their own rules to begin with.

[Dr DoGood @SeanK7YNWA]

Is the justice system a branch of the government? What would the MLB use to enforce a penalty on these players? As any rules enforced via a company in this country must abide by the very laws and rights we as free citizens have under the protections of this Nation.

Therefore the government cannot impose a punishment against religious practice and beliefs nor can any company that resides within that system.

You can make a uniform for your employees. One that adheres to the rights of free citizens. You cannot then alter that uniform to portray a symbol of beliefs that goes against those very protections.

You can’t violate those rights then cry when a free people breaks the very rule you broke to begin with.

Have a nice day

[Dr DoGood @SeanK7YNWA]

Is the justice system a branch of the government? What would the MLB use to enforce a penalty on these players? As any rules enforced via a company in this country must abide by the very laws and rights we as free citizens have under the protections of this Nation.

Therefore the government cannot impose a punishment against religious practice and beliefs nor can any company that resides within that system.

You can make a uniform for your employees. One that adheres to the rights of free citizens. You cannot then alter that uniform to portray a symbol of beliefs that goes against those very protections.

You can’t violate those rights then cry when a free people breaks the very rule you broke to begin with.

Have a nice day

[Dr DoGood @SeanK7YNWA]

Is the justice system a branch of the government? What would the MLB use to enforce a penalty on these players? As any rules enforced via a company in this country must abide by the very laws and rights we as free citizens have under the protections of this Nation.

Therefore the government cannot impose a punishment against religious practice and beliefs nor can any company that resides within that system.

You can make a uniform for your employees. One that adheres to the rights of free citizens. You cannot then alter that uniform to portray a symbol of beliefs that goes against those very protections.

You can’t violate those rights then cry when a free people breaks the very rule you broke to begin with.

Have a nice day

[Dr DoGood @SeanK7YNWA]

Even so, the league must apply itself to those standards. And even signed agreements are void if they violate their own rules and the very rights protected under our Constitution and the Law.

They have no enforcement principle in this case to deny the very thing to their players they took upon themselves to endorse.

Welcome to America

[Dr DoGood @SeanK7YNWA]

Incorrect as the uniform piece in question is also an altered uniform to symbolize a set of beliefs that is in violation of our protected rights under the first amendment.

Since the MLB is an organization within this Nation. It also herein bound to follow the protected rights of its players.

If the league can alter the uniform to endorse a set of beliefs, so can the players.

They violated their own rules. Therefore the league has no grounds to enforce any sort of penalty on the players.

Welcome to America

[Dr DoGood @SeanK7YNWA]

Simple, the camo doesn’t represent a moralistic set of beliefs.

The Pride symbol does. Which is a violation of our rights and protections under our beliefs.

You cannot violate those rights. No matter how much you want to.

If the display of scripture is a violation, so is the display of Pride. As they are sets of beliefs.

That is the equality you say you want so badly.

Welcome to America

[Dr DoGood @SeanK7YNWA]

Neither does the league.

If the league attempted to brandish dresses as the new uniform, they would be in violation of their own rules and conduct.

The same logic applies to the brandishing of altering the uniform to codify a symbolic feature of a belief system.

Sorry, your argument refutes itself.

[Dr DoGood @SeanK7YNWA]

@yellowwordle @BethFre42424263 @nytimes @TheAthletic Funny, it looks like an altered uniform to me and everyone else.

But hey, I guess it takes one to know one.

Take care

[Green Beret Nap Time @GBNT1952]

Morning patriots 🤙

[Dr DoGood @SeanK7YNWA]

@EveKeneinan The paradoxical contradictions that violate the laws of logic.

Of course those that would make these kinds of arguments don’t even recognize logic so I guess we should expect nothing less from the insanity that comes from the subjective whim of the aimless minds

[Dr DoGood @SeanK7YNWA]

@SethDillon I’ll be wearing my scripture endorsed hats to every sporting event I attend.

I think we should all make this a thing.

What do you think?

[Dr DoGood @SeanK7YNWA]

They do matter. They must also be followed by the league itself.

If the league can alter the uniform to symbolize a set of beliefs it wants to promote or endorses

Then the players have the right also to use their protected speech to endorse their beliefs.

That is how and why we have rights in the first place.

Have a nice day

[Dr DoGood @SeanK7YNWA]

They do matter. They must also be followed by the league itself.

If the league can alter the uniform to symbolize a set of beliefs it wants to promote or endorses

Then the players have the right also to use their protected speech to endorse their beliefs.

That is how and why we have rights in the first place.

Have a nice day

[Dr DoGood @SeanK7YNWA]

@seanmdav I like this one.

Seems fair to me

[Dr DoGood @SeanK7YNWA]

@yellowwordle @BethFre42424263 @nytimes @TheAthletic The pride symbol on the hat isn’t an altered uniform?

And that my friend is what is simple.

Checkmate

[Dr DoGood @SeanK7YNWA]

Just remember, it isn’t real. Which is why we should be reticent of portraying this in a fashion that seems real.

Making a creative story or a movie of some kind is fine.

But discernment should also be used in creating templates for desire, comfort, or pathogenic caricature of reality.

The danger in that should be abundantly clear to lead to a truly dystopian preface of societal norms we won’t be able to return from.

[Dr DoGood @SeanK7YNWA]

@ksorbs Same. Let me know how much is needed to contribute.

I’ll make sure I’m wearing these hats at any sporting event I go to in the foreseeable future.

[Dr DoGood @SeanK7YNWA]

@BethFre42424263 @yellowwordle @nytimes @TheAthletic Same argument applies here.

If the team has rights, so do the players. If we are symbolizing beliefs on the uniform, then we have the right to symbolize beliefs on the uniform.

It doesn’t matter if it’s optional.

[Dr DoGood @SeanK7YNWA]

I’m arguing the same point from three sides actually. Which is how I come to the conclusion of the obvious contradiction of a perceived inclusion that isn’t very inclusive.

As if it’s ok to display the symbolism of pride on the hat, then it should equally be ok to display the symbolism of scripture.

Since we are displaying sets of beliefs. If one is ok. Then so is the other.

And if you don’t like one being displayed, then you should have the same feeling on the other.

When you come to realize that is the issue at hand. As what is inclusion? If it’s not very inclusive at all.

And who is the MLB or any entity to tell you what beliefs to support? Or are ok to support?

You and I have the same rights. Even if your beliefs are different, I support your right to believe them. You should also support mine. That is how we come together against the fabric of these entities that look to tear us apart.

[Dr DoGood @SeanK7YNWA]

I’m arguing the same point from three sides actually. Which is how I come to the conclusion of the obvious contradiction of a perceived inclusion that isn’t very inclusive.

As if it’s ok to display the symbolism of pride on the hat, then it should equally be ok to display the symbolism of scripture.

Since we are displaying sets of beliefs. If one is ok. Then so is the other.

And if you don’t like one being displayed, then you should have the same feeling on the other.

When you come to realize that is the issue at hand. As what is inclusion? If it’s not very inclusive at all.

And who is the MLB or any entity to tell you what beliefs to support? Or are ok to support?

You and I have the same rights. Even if your beliefs are different, I support your right to believe them. You should also support mine. That is how we come together against the fabric of these entities that look to tear us apart.

[Dr DoGood @SeanK7YNWA]

It’s clear you don’t have the slightest idea what you are objecting against.

You say display of Pride, fine. Because the MLB is endorsing it.

Display of scripture bad? Why? Because the MLB says so?

Your objection lacks merit within your argument.

It does so a number of obvious reasons to which I can only assume you intentionally ignore for the sake of admitting the obvious contradictions of the basic understanding of our rights in this country.

Sorry, we will not be accepting your one sided terms of so called acceptance any longer.