@__j4rvis__@NamanJaniH@MinuteNerdNews I’m the dumbass but you’re criticizing the writing and direction of a movie that’s half a year away that we know like 5% about? Makes sense lol
@__j4rvis__@NamanJaniH@MinuteNerdNews And? What does that have to do with your opinions on a marvel movie? I don’t like all marvel movies. Yet I still have a marvel character. Null point
@__j4rvis__@NamanJaniH@MinuteNerdNews Im not even riding for it. Im asking genuine questions you can’t answer. I haven’t directly defended it once in this thread. I’m just calling out your logic that falls flat to anyone who thinks about it for more than 5 seconds.
@__j4rvis__@NamanJaniH@MinuteNerdNews It just seems ignorant when neither of the movies are even out yet. Avengers doesn’t even have an actual trailer. It’s ok to be biased dude. Just have the confidence to admit it.
@__j4rvis__@NamanJaniH@MinuteNerdNews Literally nothing you noted differentiated between good and bad writing. Just giving very broad things about each that even an outsider can see is extremely biased. If you aren’t logically able to explain SPECIFIC things, that’s ok. Just admit it lol
@__j4rvis__@NamanJaniH@MinuteNerdNews Tell me how to measure writing and direction and how to tell if it’s good or bad. OBJECTIVE milestones to hit to make it better. Because simple or more kid friendly doesn’t equal worse. And tell me what this cohesive “evidence” is considering the movies are 5 months away.
@__j4rvis__@NamanJaniH@MinuteNerdNews Of course it’s art. It might be art you don’t like. Or condone. Or any other reason. But it’s art nonetheless. Just as much as Dune 3 is. And they are both products as well. Nothing you say or do changes that. And artistically it doesn’t matter because again, it’s subjective.
@__j4rvis__@NamanJaniH@MinuteNerdNews If something is fulfilling to a larger amount of people, then it is better to those people which is a bigger group of people. How is this that complicated to you? “Better” when it comes to entertainment is individualized.
@__j4rvis__@NamanJaniH@MinuteNerdNews Also, if the majority of watchers were not fulfilled, they would have stopped giving marvel their money long ago. But they haven’t.
@__j4rvis__@NamanJaniH@MinuteNerdNews No. But if more people tend to give away their hard earned money towards one thing rather than another, it usually means it fulfilled more people than the other thing did. That’s objective. Same goes with games, sports, hobbies, etc. Entertainment is purely subjective.
@LT__Media@NamanJaniH@MinuteNerdNews I quite literally said that better is subjective. Didn’t even allude to the possibility of “more entertaining=better”. Just that if something is more entertaining, people will generally show up with their hard earned money. Reading comprehension doesn’t exist where you come from?
@NamanJaniH@MinuteNerdNews “Better” is purely subjective in the eye of the beholder. A better way to be objective is “what’s more entertaining?” Typically it’s the one that people throw their hard earned money at regardless of how you or me view it.
Just in: San Antonio Spurs forward Julian Champagnie intends to sign a new three-year, $45 million contract with the franchise through 2028-29, sources tell ESPN. The Spurs declined Champagnie’s $3 million team option to give him a new deal. Waived three years ago, Champagnie has become a vital part of the Spurs core.