🇨🇴‼️| La Comisión Legal de Investigación y Acusación de la Cámara de Representantes suspendió a Gustavo Petro de su cargo como presidente de Colombia hasta el próximo 21 de junio, momento en el que se ejecutarán las elecciones presidenciales. Según Blu Radio, la decisión tiene efecto inmediato, es por participar en política y fue impulsada por Gloria Elena Arizabaleta, presidenta de la comisión.
I'll admit the propagandists got me, at least enough to bother to look into it a little. I actually opened my mind enough to bother looking up the USS Liberty story a few weeks ago, even though I know agitprop when I see it.
People really should bother to go look into the story instead of just hanging out in the emotionally driven agitprop. Multiple investigations turn up no evidence of intentional wrongdoing. Israel apologizing and paying reparations. The facts of the relationship between Israel and the United States in 1967 (not quite the same as we have today!). The contingencies of the Six Day War.
Here's one simple example.
Before the Six Days War (June 5-11, 1967), the U.S. policy toward Israel and the Middle East was one of "balance." The U.S. refused to take a side. Through both the Kennedy and Eisenhower administrations, the goal was to strike a balance between the state of Israel, the local conservative monarchies, and the radical revolutionary Islamic states. The U.S. wasn't an ally of Israel; it was neutral and seeking to avoid any entanglements in the area. Its interests were dealing with the Soviets and the Cold War and oil concerns, mostly, and Israel wasn't that interesting of an ally in those concerns.
After the Six Days War, which is when the friendly-fire attack on the USS Liberty occurred (on Day 4 of 6, so June 8), U.S. policy on Israel and the Middle East shifted completely to alignment with Israel that became allyship.
Why would the United States shift from neutrality to alignment with a country that had just attacked one of its naval vessels unless it was already clear hostilities weren't intended? "Don't touch our boats" was an attitude of the U.S. Navy at the time too, and one of our boats definitely got touched. Two or three days later, however, you see the United States immediately shifting its priorities to the one that lasts to today: military support and coordination with Israel, conditional support for Arab states based on their alignment with U.S. interests, and working actively to contain pro-Communist forces and movements in the region.
Think about it for a second. The "attack" on the USS Liberty hits on June 8, 1967, and ENDS long-standing U.S. policy not to be involved in the tumults of the Middle East. Within just three or four days, the United States throws in WITH, not AGAINST, Israel in the region. It is this alignment that the propagandists today are trying to undo, ironically using the USS Liberty attack as a lever.
If you look into any of the details of this story, the emotionally driven agitating propaganda from the Woke Right and its accessories (plainly visible all over social media for months now and TPUSA platforms this week) completely falls apart. None of their claims make any sense except that they make you FEEL betrayed. If you're falling for it, you're being manipulated.
How can you get unmanipulated?
THINK FOR YOURSELF!
Rather than listening to podcasters and agitprop artists and short TikTok videos, go research the story yourself. You'll be angry that you did because it will show you that you've been manipulated and that the manipulation not only led you to hold awful positions but to have to waste your time looking into this little bit of largely irrelevant military history (in any big picture).
You'll find the declassified reports from both countries finding no evidence of wrongdoing. You'll find reports of the CIA recognizing the power and strategic value of aligning explicitly with Israel for all U.S. interests (America first!). You'll find that Israel stopped the attack as soon as it realized, apologized, paid reparations, did a thorough investigation, etc.
You'll also find out that the U.S. wasn't even an ally of Israel before or during the war but was just days later after the war ended, which cannot be explained by believing the attack was deliberate as an act of war against a U.S. Naval vessel and our brave U.S. Seamen.
Think for yourself. Do your own REAL research. You'll see how much you're being lied to, yet again, just like during Covid, and you can start to ask yourself WHY.
The answer is simple: The Woke Right is the CONTINUATION of the Woke project to destroy America, using the Right now since they hit a wall (namely, us) with using the Left.
.@Apple Planned Obsolescence
The “Truth” about why the headphone jack was removed.
I wonder how much damage has been done to the human brain with bluetooth tech?
⭕️ Estoy seguro de que ustedes, españoles que pagan sus impuestos, están felices de enviar estos casi 600.000€ públicos hace unos días a:
“LA AGENCIA METROPOLITANA DEL TRANSPORTE DE MAPUTO (MOZAMBIQUE), PARA QUE LUCHE CONTRA EL CAMBIO CLIMÁTICO”
Hay más, aquí…https://t.co/bakaFbB69H
NO LA VEN.
"Ciertas cosas fueron mas beneficiosas para los machos y otras mas beneficiosas para las hembras. Somos herederos de esos genes ancestrales... ...de quienes tuvieron mayor capacidad que su cría sobreviva".
Leonardo Orlando.
@LucassGBlanco@CarnavalStream
Jeff Bezos reveals why compromise is one of the worst ways to resolve a disagreement
"An example of a really bad way of coming to agreement is compromise. If I say the ceiling is 11 feet and you say 12 feet, we say let's call it 11 and a half. That's compromise"
"The advantage of compromise is it's low energy. But it doesn't lead to truth"
"Another really bad resolution mechanism is who's more stubborn. Two executives disagree, they have a war of attrition, and whichever one gets exhausted first capitulates. You haven't arrived at truth, and this is very demoralizing"
"Escalation is better than a war of attrition. Escalate to your boss and say, we can't agree, we like each other, we're respectful, but we strongly disagree, we need you to make a decision"
"Exhausting the other person is not truth seeking. Compromise is not truth seeking"
This is a good glimpse at the technique behind Wilson's sophistry.
Asking for specific stats and names is a tried-and-true debate technique. If your opponent isn't prepared to rattle off a complete list of very specific examples, you can make them look stupid, even if they're in the right.
For example, you can say something like "There's been a rise in antisemitism on the internet." This is obviously self-evidently true for anyone who has spent a moment online lately. Andrew can respond with "Who? Who said something antisemitic? Name one person! What did they say?"
If you blank out on this question for one second, it's over. He won.
If you give only one or two examples, he can respond, "Two people? Just two people said something, and you think that means a rise in antisemitism? Are you insane?"
In Lauren Southern's case, she pushed past this hurdle and gave him examples, so what did he do? He simply pretended like Lauren hadn't just said what she had said. He gaslit her and the audience and tried to move on.
For most low-IQ Wilson fans, that's enough for them. They think he won even though the facts aren't on his side.
¿Lo de Irene Montero haciendo como que se graba a sí misma en una mani mientras tiene a un esbirro sujetándole el móvil qué es?
¿Cuánto nos costará el sueldo de este señor por tan elevadas funciones? 😂
A mayor ingreso menos hijos. Claramente el sistema tributario progresivo explica en parte esto. A la larga un desastre para el país porque la gente de mayor capital humano es la que menos hijos tiene con consecuencias catastróficas para el crecimiento económico, recaudación de impuestos etc.
@petrogustavo Pero Petro, usted se metió en las elecciones argentinas del 2023 apoyando al kirchnerismo, ¿o las sustancias tóxicas que consume con tanta devoción le han perjudicado la memoria?
Son feministas hasta que Bad Bunny les baila pegado.
Son socialistas hasta que descubren lo cómoda que es volar en primera clase.
Son ecologistas hasta que toca un fin de semana en yate o un vuelo a las Maldivas.
Son tolerantes hasta que se enteran de que votas a la derecha.
Son pacifistas hasta que alguien discrepa de ellos.
Son partidarios de la libertad de expresión hasta que escuchan algo que no les gusta.
Son antielitistas hasta que los invitan a un reservado VIP.
Son ciudadanos del mundo hasta que les toca tenerlos de vecino.
Son partidarios de repartir la riqueza hasta que les toca repartir la suya.
“Argentina está cambiando su matriz productiva. En AMBA no nos damos cuenta. Esta idea de que la minería no produce trabajo ¿ah, no? O sea, no hay obreros mineros, camiones, logística, comida ni caminos. No es solo las Pymes en Berazategui. Son las Pymes y las provincias”.
So, to summarize:
German homo gets famous for twerking on stage in a dress.
Becomes prominent LGBT activist.
Politicians love him.
Elected the official Gay Berlin Ambassador.
Gets arrested for child porn.
Judge: “Meh, it's ok. You didn't mean it.”
No jail time. $70/day fine.
Continues to do activism.
Is invited to play with kids in Japan on behalf of Germany's Foreign Office despite being a convicted pedophile.
Gets arrested for even more child porn.
Westcol: ¿Qué debería hacer si un ladrón entra a robar a mi casa?
Petro: ¿Propones matar a los delincuentes? Tienen familia.
Abelardo: Dale con lo que encuentres.
🇷🇺 A 44-year-old man grabbed a 5-year-old girl in Russia and carried her inside as she screamed.
But a young boy stopped the kidnapping by holding the door open and calling for help.
The suspect was arrested and is now in custody.
Well done, mate 🫡
🔴 Álvaro García Ortiz: condenado
🟠 José Luis Ábalos: en juicio
🟠 Koldo García: en juicio
🟠 Víctor de Aldama: en juicio
🟠 David Sánchez: en juicio
🟠 Miguel Ángel Gallardo: en juicio
🟡 Begoña Gómez: imputada
🟡 José Luis R. Zapatero: imputado
🟡 Santos Cerdán: imputado
🟡 Leire Díez: imputada
🟡 Julio Martínez: imputado
🟡 Gertrudis Alcázar: imputada
🟡 Cristina Álvarez: imputada
🟡 Gaspar Zarrías: imputado
🟡 Ana María Fuentes: imputada
Si después de esto no dimite Ayuso, yo ya no sé