I'm going to be completely honest... sometimes I feel like the more people tend to read theory, the less they actually are able to adopt a proper leftist view. I know so many ppl who can quote from Marx to Fanon in a heartbeat, but like, they are unable to apply theory IRL.
Kyle Kulinski: “All Hasan does all day every day is call for people to have healthcare and education and to end the wars and to stop arming genocide. And you guys say: he’s so extreme, how dare he say edgy things and make jokes! Meanwhile Donald Trump’s out there like: look at all these shithole countries, every Somali in this country is terrible, they’re all criminals”
If hasan was really something he would disappear before even getting this big but the right know he is more useful by being used as a decoy and everyone in USA enjoy this facade they are not going to listen to people from outside
Hasan has always been an pawn for the US government. He is literally just the controlled opposition created. You think the US government would ever let a communist get popular? That is why realy anti-imperialist outlets are being targeted, while he is doing this...
"I don't want any harm committed against random citizens, whether they be Jewish or Muslim."
Left-wing streamer @hasanthehun sits down with Haaretz's @Etanetan23
Read the full conversation here: https://t.co/QU8uqrcdLl
In Margaret Atwood's "The Handmaid's Tale", Serena Joy is a conservative, religious woman of high status. She used to be a prominent activist & public speaker who defended conservative ideas, only to have her own power stripped away once the system was established.
"She doesn't make speeches anymore. She has become speechless. She stays in her home, but it doesn't seem to agree with her. How furious she must be, now that she's been taken at her word." (The Handmaid's Tale - Chapter 8)
— In the song "serena joy", Olivia explores the hypocrisy of conservative women believing the system they uphold will somehow spare them, only to realize that ironically, it will oppress them too: "if they do it to them, they'll do it to you. if they do it to them, they're gonna do it to you"
they have gone past even understanding what gender is in the first place.
They want to bad to appear like a "real Marxist" that they can't even critically analyse how "gender" can be approached with dialectical materialism. Gender is not *material*, but has material consequences.
White people simply cannot comprehend Dialectical Materialism.
They don't know how to have criteria. It's all or nothing for them. And its ironic, cuz you can have an dia-sci analysis on gender, but this person is too focused on trying to fit "gender" into this framework that
Honestly, this just feels a little too performative of a statement. For men AND women.
He is saying being attracted to women is a curse...?
1 it works for straight women to say that about men, not vice versa
2 his tone is a little too intentionally vague