@awkwardgoogle It's gonna be fake but on the 0.1% chance it isn't, that entitlement doesn't just appear at graduation, that's honed over years of being spoiled and not taught the value of money.
Parenting fail that will just multiply now in the child turning adult.
@BrianAtlas When this woman is alone at 80 in a care home being abused by underpaid staff who barely speak English, I wonder if she will reflect on this.
@La_PsyChiq You are wrong. Phone numbers, like addresses and even emails are given out for specific reasons. Accessing them and contacting for other reasons is a violation of privacy and an invasion into someones private life. Real easy to just not be a creep.
@AutoPap 13500 today isn't the same money as it was 8 years ago and unless you've done really low miles, so low that the running costs weren't worth it, it's not worth 13500 today lol
@jezzle9@FietserGlasgow The post implies driver is a liar and has a strong potential to result in harassment of the driver by making them identifiable.
"Reputational harm" could be shown if the driver was able to prove they had a genuine belief when posting in their version of events.
@tomjsh@FietserGlasgow You might be correct on the registration, I've only viewed on a phone screen and my phone usually plays low resolution.
The context of the post is implying the driver to be a liar - probable, but given the incident they may be an oblivious old person who shouldn't be on the road
@MedicGrandpa@FietserGlasgow Unwarranted harm and any harassment stemming from the post (which is plausible, especially given some comments) put OP into a risk bracket for legal trouble.
@MedicGrandpa@FietserGlasgow Case for complaint would be the screenshot being posted out of context. Lack of censorship and the combination with the video is implicit of declaring the driver a liar - a possibility exists that the driver was so unaware of their surroundings they genuinely believe their story
@54JohnBull@FietserGlasgow Was it a public forum? Are you sure it wasn't a closed group or on a persons fb wall, ringfenced to friends of friends?
Separate platform and the limited context make it a problem, as does removing the authors control.
@theErdTirdMans@FietserGlasgow Licence plates are to identify vehicles, insurance, MOT status and their registered keepers. It is unlikely her comment was in response to the video at all, it also may not have been public but within a private group.
The video is fine, it's the combo.
@MedicGrandpa@FietserGlasgow The video isn't in question, it's combining the video with the name making them identifiable.
The no expectation of privacy applies to information exposed in a public place, the comment from another platform may not have been, and sharing it alongside the video is iffy.
@TheRealDarkSole@FietserGlasgow Absolutely and the driver should get a ban, points on their licence etc.
That still doesn't change the issue with attaching an identifiable name to the video, the video of course is fine on its own though.
@ClaireMadMax@FietserGlasgow Attempted murder would require intent, this is likely driving without due care and attention or, more likely, dangerous driving. It warrants a driving ban imo and I hope the victim wasn't badly injured.