Nothing on anime enters on the “Depiction of children” dilemma
When we talk about “depiction of children”, we talk about indistinguishable 1:1 real life copies, like hyper-realism, or realistic computer generated images, not cartoons
Source: i studied psychology on college lmao
@F_NTiC@menmakii So? It's still a depiction of a child, even if they are technically of age, they are still depicted as a child. And so drawing porn of something that represents a child is pedo art
It's not that hard of a concept to understand
You guys would shoot yourselves in the foot before admitting that Hoyoverse profits off the objectification of women and it's getting reaaalllyyyy annoying
i hope naoto is confirmed as transgender in the remake. partially because it'd be cool, partially to piss off people. but mostly because it'd be cool.
make persona gayer NOW.
Yo psychology student here
Nothing on anime can actually resemble any sort of "pedophilic" tendency, it's backed by way more scientific papers that you'd imagine along with the studies about fictional violence not causing kids to become violent
Stop this fake ass narrative lmao
Idgaf what people headcannons (because Oda already said that this is not true)
But do you realize how BAD of a look it would be for trans people if Yamato actually was trans
Like do you understand her character and what it meant at all
When u notice that retards like this dont even care about discussions and instead all is a culture war for them you realize a lot of stuff lol
The main guy did not even say anything bad, these mfs have the brain ate by twitter and their little bubbles
"all I did was give some valid criticism"
"all I did was ask for a simple apology"
"all I did was push for a Sincere Apology"
"all I did was tell them to change their art or else"
"hey all I did was give some criticism...why are you defending such a disgusting evil bigot?"