∅SenbakG∅

[∅SenbakG∅ @SenbakG]

@AxiomaticSubaru @PREEM1E The ugliest fucking list ive seen in my life

[∅SenbakG∅ @SenbakG]

@ZDS_1941 @Goxter99 @BradyYourTutor_ Are you serious right now

[∅SenbakG∅ @SenbakG]

@N0rbertas @KYRA_RISING You're so fucking stupid

[∅SenbakG∅ @SenbakG]

@e_liphas @LasagneWest @KYRA_RISING The bubbles in question:

Railway mania
Dot-com
US Housing
Automobile
Japan asset market

[∅SenbakG∅ @SenbakG]

@Autism_Crimes @LasagneWest @KYRA_RISING "Once ai is gone"

[∅SenbakG∅ @SenbakG]

@KYRA_RISING You people are fucking stupid

[∅SenbakG∅ @SenbakG]

@Elitemedia2090 @Vivek4real_ Are you fucking stupid

[∅SenbakG∅ @SenbakG]

@n0tKmu @Kristo67501283 @Malachii_186 "massive wall of text" and the average person could read that in less than 2 minutes. Go read some books you're embarrassing yourself. And by the way i think a person who averages 11 posts/day has 2 minutes to spare you dick rider.

[∅SenbakG∅ @SenbakG]

@TheMagnumP @HunterEKozak @CBHeresy Provocation was the primary doctrine that the op was referencing. And what were the other reasonable ways to stop the whailing? Considering TN has stand your ground. And if it was actual "whailing" it can, once again, qualify as SBI depending on the severity and duration.

[∅SenbakG∅ @SenbakG]

@msp8620 @HaTraGfY @CBHeresy Nice lying out your ass.

[∅SenbakG∅ @SenbakG]

@dakotdj @CorneliusG14926 @cutepicsofsyko

[∅SenbakG∅ @SenbakG]

@TheMagnumP @HunterEKozak @CBHeresy I wasn't talking about proportionality i was talking about provocation. Please fucking read. But on the topic of proportionality, if you reasonably believe you face serious bodily injury, you may use deadly force if necessary to stop it. And "whaling" can be defined as SBI.

[∅SenbakG∅ @SenbakG]

@dakotdj @CorneliusG14926 @cutepicsofsyko The op's claim is “modern audiences just automatically hate endings now” which is completely unfounded. Stop acting fucking stupid. Hes not claiming a specific reason as to why BB's finale would get hated on. Repeating "he said BB not BCS’" doesn’t address the actual claim.

[∅SenbakG∅ @SenbakG]

@TheMagnumP @HunterEKozak @CBHeresy Pretty ballsy just saying "not true" while being completely ignorant and not knowing shit. TN law focuses on unlawful force and initial aggression, not mere offensive speech. Go ahead and show me a Tennessee case where slurs alone eliminated a valid self defense claim. Retard.

[∅SenbakG∅ @SenbakG]

@dakotdj @CorneliusG14926 @cutepicsofsyko Once again, the distinction only matters if you can cite specific details as to why it would happen to breaking bad and NOT better call Saul.

[∅SenbakG∅ @SenbakG]

@Misterm51177781 @cutepicsofsyko Seems like you want to cherry pick. Stranger things ended only 5 months ago. What are you on about?

[∅SenbakG∅ @SenbakG]

@Harryreid6104 @0hour1 Yes because DA's never start overzealous or engage in overcharging right? And the DA never said anything was premeditated you weird liar.

[∅SenbakG∅ @SenbakG]

@TyrantKing68 @n4p0ll @Sp1thfc Assuming its slurs alone. Slurs alone do not rise to the level of provocation that would prevent a valid self defense claim. Whats so fucking complicated about that?

[∅SenbakG∅ @SenbakG]

@SlimFrmThe4 @billybrizzle420 everything you mentioned usually doesn’t matter if the other person is the initial aggressor who escalates to imminent unlawful force capable of causing death or great bodily harm.

[∅SenbakG∅ @SenbakG]

@TheMagnumP @HunterEKozak @CBHeresy Courts generally do not treat verbal slurs alone as sufficient provocation to eliminate a person’s right to claim self-defense clown.