Ilan Pappé qualifica Israel d'etnocràcia, perquè prioritza els drets dels jueus per davant dels de les altres ètnies, sobretot els palestins. En un grau menys greu, Espanya també és una etnocràcia, perquè prioritza els drets dels espanyols i minimitza els de les altres ètnies?
Espanya aprofita la visita del Papa per convertir Antoni Gaudí en un "arquitecto español".
No ho podem permetre.
Hem fet un web en 10 llengües per explicar al món que Gaudí era català i no espanyol.
Fes clic aquí: https://t.co/jAwUxNXDmv
@ArenysD@dempeusXindepe Una entelèquia és el que proposen els senyors que diuen que estan dempeus...
Però si vols una proposta pràctica, aquesta ho és, "només" requereix unitat...
👇👇👇👇👇
L'EFECTE REFERÈNDUM DE LA LLISTA SENSE PRESIDENT https://t.co/3PQuEz6pgb
@joeldiazbrah@Antoni_Gelonch@elnacionalcat A més el tuit francès és una bajanada que ha tingut èxit pq en Musk i altres magnats siliconesos l'han retuitejat, aquest altre tuit l'esbudella amb criteri
https://t.co/2IH88YQIoc
Let me be clear about where I stand before I start. I am modernist as fuck. I have no patience for the postmodern move of collapsing everything into discourse and subjectivity. So no, I am not writing this to defend postmodernism.
I am writing this because your text is full of merde. Dishonest merde. You have constructed a clean, elegant narrative that feels true and is largely false.
You claim that Judith Butler read Foucault and invented performative gender. This is historically illiterate. Erving Goffman, an American sociologist working in Chicago in the 1950s, had already built an entire theory of social performance in "The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life" (1959). His dramaturgical framework, rooted in American pragmatism and symbolic interactionism, showed that identity is enacted rather than given, well before Butler opened a single page of Foucault. Performativity did not cross the Atlantic from Paris. It was already growing in the American Midwest.
Your genealogy of post-colonial studies is an erasure. Edward Said's "Orientalism" draws its political force from Frantz Fanon, a Martinican-Algerian psychiatrist writing from the front lines of anti-colonial struggle, and from Aimé Césaire, Albert Memmi, and the entire Négritude tradition. These were not Parisian intellectual games. They were responses to actual colonial violence. Said used some Foucauldian vocabulary, yes. But reducing his work to a derivative of three French philosophers is like saying Marx just borrowed from Hegel and ignoring the Manchester factory floors he was looking at.
Crenshaw's intersectionality emerges from Critical Race Theory, a legal academic movement rooted in the American civil rights tradition, and from Black feminist thought stretching back to Sojourner Truth, the Combahee River Collective, and Patricia Hill Collins. The idea that overlapping systems of oppression compound one another does not require Foucault. It requires paying attention to what was actually happening to Black women in American courts, workplaces, and hospitals. Tracing her work back to three Parisian philosophers is not analysis. It is BOLLOCKS.
Then there is your antidote: Silicon Valley, the builders, the people who believe in truth and beauty. This is where your argument collapses face-first. The intellectual substrate of the Thiel-Andreessen orbit includes low IQ Curtis Yarvin, who argues for the abolition of democracy and a return to monarchic corporate governance, and low IQ Nick Land, a philosopher so deep into accelerationism that he advocates for civilisational collapse as a positive outcome. These are the theorists being passed around in those circles right now. Compared to Derrida, Land makes deconstruction look like a children's book. Your builders are reading some of the most nihilistic, anti-humanist, low-rigour political philosophy produced in the last fifty years.
And the logical architecture collapses just as fast. You commit a post hoc fallacy: wokism came after French Theory, therefore French Theory caused it, with no causal mechanism established. You use a genetic fallacy, dismissing ideas by their Parisian origin rather than their content. You run a slippery slope without defending the steps; "no fixed truth" does not automatically produce "all norms are violence." You strawman gender theory as an inability to define what a woman is, rather than engaging with any actual literature. And you set up a false dichotomy between builders and deconstructors, as if critical thinking and productive work are mutually exclusive.
You built an eloquent argument but the argument itself is full of merde, illogical, and epistimonologically wrong.
The answer to postmodernisn is not idiots like you not reading properly the literature, throwing a made up origin story, and adding a low IQ Silicon Valley fairy tale.
Do better next time, although I highly doubt you can.
@Antoni_Gelonch Vols dir que ni tan sols havies vist el tuit d'on prové el text gairebé literal del teu "article"? I evidentment tampoc aquest altre que l'esbudella punt per punt?
https://t.co/2IH88YQIoc
Let me be clear about where I stand before I start. I am modernist as fuck. I have no patience for the postmodern move of collapsing everything into discourse and subjectivity. So no, I am not writing this to defend postmodernism.
I am writing this because your text is full of merde. Dishonest merde. You have constructed a clean, elegant narrative that feels true and is largely false.
You claim that Judith Butler read Foucault and invented performative gender. This is historically illiterate. Erving Goffman, an American sociologist working in Chicago in the 1950s, had already built an entire theory of social performance in "The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life" (1959). His dramaturgical framework, rooted in American pragmatism and symbolic interactionism, showed that identity is enacted rather than given, well before Butler opened a single page of Foucault. Performativity did not cross the Atlantic from Paris. It was already growing in the American Midwest.
Your genealogy of post-colonial studies is an erasure. Edward Said's "Orientalism" draws its political force from Frantz Fanon, a Martinican-Algerian psychiatrist writing from the front lines of anti-colonial struggle, and from Aimé Césaire, Albert Memmi, and the entire Négritude tradition. These were not Parisian intellectual games. They were responses to actual colonial violence. Said used some Foucauldian vocabulary, yes. But reducing his work to a derivative of three French philosophers is like saying Marx just borrowed from Hegel and ignoring the Manchester factory floors he was looking at.
Crenshaw's intersectionality emerges from Critical Race Theory, a legal academic movement rooted in the American civil rights tradition, and from Black feminist thought stretching back to Sojourner Truth, the Combahee River Collective, and Patricia Hill Collins. The idea that overlapping systems of oppression compound one another does not require Foucault. It requires paying attention to what was actually happening to Black women in American courts, workplaces, and hospitals. Tracing her work back to three Parisian philosophers is not analysis. It is BOLLOCKS.
Then there is your antidote: Silicon Valley, the builders, the people who believe in truth and beauty. This is where your argument collapses face-first. The intellectual substrate of the Thiel-Andreessen orbit includes low IQ Curtis Yarvin, who argues for the abolition of democracy and a return to monarchic corporate governance, and low IQ Nick Land, a philosopher so deep into accelerationism that he advocates for civilisational collapse as a positive outcome. These are the theorists being passed around in those circles right now. Compared to Derrida, Land makes deconstruction look like a children's book. Your builders are reading some of the most nihilistic, anti-humanist, low-rigour political philosophy produced in the last fifty years.
And the logical architecture collapses just as fast. You commit a post hoc fallacy: wokism came after French Theory, therefore French Theory caused it, with no causal mechanism established. You use a genetic fallacy, dismissing ideas by their Parisian origin rather than their content. You run a slippery slope without defending the steps; "no fixed truth" does not automatically produce "all norms are violence." You strawman gender theory as an inability to define what a woman is, rather than engaging with any actual literature. And you set up a false dichotomy between builders and deconstructors, as if critical thinking and productive work are mutually exclusive.
You built an eloquent argument but the argument itself is full of merde, illogical, and epistimonologically wrong.
The answer to postmodernisn is not idiots like you not reading properly the literature, throwing a made up origin story, and adding a low IQ Silicon Valley fairy tale.
Do better next time, although I highly doubt you can.
Hem estat injustos. La compra d’una espasa samurai que ha fet recentment el Govern d’Aragó amagava una història preciosa d’honor i memòria aragonesa.
La katana d’Oioki.
El meu dit a l’ull dels divendres a Segre.
https://t.co/TaiA0ljuN7
"Tenemos los planes para fomentar la expulsión de la población palestina desde Gaza, para promover la expulsión desde Cisjordania y para colonizar el Líbano. Estamos en un periodo de redención bíblica, por eso no debemos parar y seguir en Gaza, Líbano, Cisjordania".
Ben Gvir, ministro genocida de Seguridad Nacional de "Israel", dio rienda suelta a sus delirios mesiánicos y colonialistas afirmando que la limpieza étnica en Gaza, Cisjordania y Líbano son "planes bíblicos de dios".
Estos dementes que te hablan de redenciones bíblicas para referirse a limpiezas étnicas, tienen un botón nuclear y al mundo no parece importarle.
@assemblea@vpartal@VilaWeb Va, busquem-los un nom: exindependentistes, exsobiranistes, neoautonomistes, criptoautonomistes...
I no, botiflers i similars ja està massa gastat.
@assemblea@vpartal@VilaWeb És que és de calaix: l'independentisme no sura sobre el no-res, surt d'uns greuges enormes que no han desaparegut, i quan no confronta és que els està ignorant o minimitzant. Quan deixarem d'anomenar "independentistes" els que fan això? Potser ja va sent hora...
@moa_pio No et canses d'equivocar-te sempre?
En les teves prediccions, els teus anàlisis, les teves afirmacions, les teves adscripcions...
Té, una mica d'aliment intel·lectual 👇
LA NACIÓN ESPAÑOLA TODAVÍA NO EXISTE
https://t.co/oeZeqiwuRN
@antoniobanos_ Però a veure: aquests són (no)nacionalistes espanyols?
No els heu explicat que...
LA NACIÓ ESPANYOLA ENCARA NO EXISTEIX https://t.co/R224ZuSZgS
@antoniobanos_ Sí, independència.
Però com es fa, això?
Doncs així:
👇👇👇👇
DE L’ESCÀNDOL INTERNACIONAL A LA INDEPENDÈNCIA EFECTIVA https://t.co/ImhJvLlTxN
"No som un país normal perquè no s'ha investigat de forma crítica la institució que té més poder"
📢@RafaBurgosBCN, ho ha fet. I tu pots ajudar a que arribi a tots els racons: ➡️https://t.co/wRBBz9kwXs⬅️
🗞️Llegeix l'entrevista sencera a @MediacatCat 👇
https://t.co/yIqAFfwHLX