Serbats

[Dr. David @DrDavidivw]

Can Fenbendazole Cure Cancer?

According to a case series published in an oncology journal, the answer could be a resounding yes.

The case report highlights three cancer patients who were in pretty bad shape. But after taking fenbendazole, they all experienced a complete remission.

What Is Fenbendazole, and How Does it Work?

Fenbendazole (FBZ) is a medicine originally designed to treat worms and parasites in animals. Its sister drugs, Mebendazole and Albendazole, have had remarkable success treating similar ailments in humans with few side effects.

Recently, anecdotal reports have praised fenbendazole as a potentially miraculous anti-cancer drug. It works by destabilizing microtubules, the structures that help cancer cells divide and grow. By disrupting this process, fenbendazole effectively halts cancer cell division and slows or stops tumor growth.

Miraculous Recoveries After Taking Fenbendazole

Case series #1 features a 63-year-old man with advanced kidney cancer (clear cell renal carcinoma) who experienced tumor recurrence and severe side effects from multiple cancer therapies, including surgery and two different medications.

With no effective options left, he turned to fenbendazole (FBZ), taking 1 gram three times a week at a friend’s suggestion. Over the next 10 months, his tumors—including those in his pancreas and spine—showed near-complete resolution on imaging. Remarkably, he experienced no side effects from FBZ, and follow-up scans have shown no signs of recurrence.

Case series #2 follows a 72-year-old man with metastatic urethral cancer that had spread to his lungs, lymph nodes, and brain. Despite undergoing multiple rounds of chemotherapy and radiation, one lymph node continued to grow, resisting all treatments.

Seeking alternatives, he decided to try fenbendazole (FBZ), taking 1 gram three times a week, along with vitamin E, curcumin, and CBD oil, while postponing further conventional therapies. Over the next nine months, imaging revealed a dramatic response, with the lymph node shrinking significantly until it completely resolved. Remarkably, he reported no side effects during this period.

Case series #3 focuses on a 63-year-old woman diagnosed with a large, invasive bladder tumor. Facing a challenging prognosis, she underwent chemotherapy while also taking fenbendazole (FBZ) at 1 gram three times a week.

After completing six cycles of treatment, follow-up scans showed a complete resolution of the tumor, with only minimal thickening remaining in the bladder wall. Confident in her recovery, she chose to decline further surgery and remains disease-free under regular surveillance.

The abstract concluded, “FBZ appears to be a potentially safe and effective antineoplastic agent that can be repurposed for human use in treating genitourinary malignancies.”

Reflecting on these remarkable case reports, Dr. John Campbell (
@Johnincarlisle
) urged drug regulators to “start looking at this as a matter of some urgency because people are dying from cancer now.”

“So if something is safe and effective, surely it can be accredited for human use by our national authorizing agencies pretty quickly if they want to,” Dr. Campbell added with a hint of sarcasm.

Of course, the key words here are “if they want to.”

“Three patients, basically… cured of their cancers. Read the paper for yourself. That’s what they seem to be saying to me.”

[Dr. David @DrDavidivw]

BOOM.

This is exactly why Big Pharma and the NCI buried it.

They’re about to lose billions.

Ivermectin & Mebendazole are curing cancer — something chemotherapy could never do. Nearly 200 patients. Multiple cancer types. 84% positive outcomes.

[RXMEDS.STORE @rxmeds_store]

🚨 WHY IVERMECTIN DOSING ISN'T ONE SIZE FITS ALL. THIS PHYSICIAN EXPLAINS THE DIFFERENCE.

A physician starts with a point that many people overlook:

Ivermectin dosing is weight based.

So before discussing any amount, she starts with body weight.

📌 Her conversion:

Weight in pounds ÷ 2.2 = kilograms

Her example:

130 lb ÷ 2.2 ≈ 59 kg

But that's only the starting point.

She then explains that the amount she discusses changes depending on what Ivermectin is being used for.

💊 PREVENTION

0.2 mg/kg twice a week

💊 PARASITE CLEANSE

0.3 mg/kg

She says she then follows the protocol associated with her parasite cleanse.

💊 COVID, FLU OR RSV

She describes a range of:

0.4 to 0.6 mg/kg

She also explains that she may round the calculated amount upward to an even 5 mg increment.

Then comes the most variable category.

💊 CANCER

She says the amount can depend on:

• Cancer type
• Cancer stage
• Disease progression
• How aggressive the approach is

She says she may go as high as:

📈 1 mg/kg or higher

Then she gives the principle behind her entire explanation:

"It just depends on what you're doing it for."

And the lowest amount she says she would use?

📌 0.2 mg/kg

But the bigger takeaway from this discussion is simple:

Ivermectin dosing depends on what it is being used for, not just body weight.

And simply converting pounds to kilograms and applying a number isn't enough to determine an appropriate treatment plan.

Indication, formulation, other medications, medical history, and safety all matter.

Ivermectin has a long history of human use, but higher doses can increase the risk of adverse effects. The FDA also distinguishes human ivermectin products from veterinary formulations, which are not substitutes for medicines intended for people.

And when the indication is experimental, particularly cancer, the dosing question is something clinical research still needs to answer.

📌 Save this post if you're researching Ivermectin dosing and want to understand why there isn't one universal number.

🔄 Repost it so others researching Ivermectin can see the discussion.

💊 Exploring Ivermectin? See why thousands of customers worldwide choose @rxmeds_store for pharmaceutical grade Ivermectin.

#Ivermectin #IvermectinDosage #IvermectinResearch #RepurposedDrugs #MedicalResearch

[Nicolas Hulscher, MPH @NicHulscher]

We found 84% of cancer patients taking ivermectin + mebendazole declared their cancer had COMPLETELY DISAPPEARED, SHRUNK, or STOPPED SPREADING after 6 months.

Our study is now PEER-REVIEWED and PUBLISHED by the International Institute of Anticancer Research.

[Paul White Gold Eagle @PaulGoldEagle]

BREAKING NEWS: First in the World IVERMECTIN, Mebendazole and Fenbendazole Protocol for CANCER has been peer-reviewed & published!

The NEWS is spreading, our paper is everyplace lately! 😃

BIG PHARMA is attacking our Fenbendazole paper on 3 Stage 4 Cancer patients now Cancer Free! It will be resubmitted and published soon!

Well I have recently been attacked by Canadian authorities for my revolutionary Cancer research and work but ...

NEW FLORIDA CANCER CLINIC ON THE HORIZON!🙏

Thank you all for your continued support!! 😃

God Bless you all and God Bless those that are fighting Cancer...

[PharmacyinUSA @pharmacyinusa]

🚨 76-YEAR-OLD WITH GLEASON 7 PROSTATE CANCER TAKES IVERMECTIN. 12 WEEKS LATER, PET SCAN SHOWS NOTHING.

A doctor shared the story of a 76-year-old veteran who had been diagnosed with Gleason 7 prostate cancer.

According to the doctor, the patient began taking 12 mg of Ivermectin daily.

After eight weeks, he continued with follow-up testing.

At around 12 weeks, he underwent a specialized PET scan looking for abnormalities associated with the prostate.

The doctor says the scan could no longer find the cancerous abnormalities.

There was another change too.

His PSA, which had been 12.6 when the cancer was initially diagnosed, had dropped to 5.3.

That is a significant change in the numbers the doctor shared.

The story raises an obvious question about the potential role of Ivermectin in prostate cancer, particularly given the growing interest in repurposing older medicines for oncology.

Ivermectin is already well established as an antiparasitic medicine, while research into its potential anticancer effects continues to explore mechanisms involving cancer cell growth, survival and signaling.

Could Ivermectin deserve a closer look in prostate cancer research?

[Paul E. Marik @DrPaulEMarik]

🚨 TURBO CANCER is real and it’s exploding after COVID vaccines. 🤷🏼‍♂️

Pfizer. Moderna. AstraZeneca. J&J.
I’ve been sounding the alarm since 2022 when jabbed Canadian doctors started dying of aggressive cancers… warnings that were buried.
Over 9,000 cancer patients later, the pattern is undeniable.

These are not normal cancers: Far more aggressive
• Present at later stages
• Grow faster
• Spread unpredictably
• Resistant to conventional treatment

Top Turbo Cancers:
1. Lymphoma
2. Brain (Glioblastoma)
3. Triple-negative breast
4. Stage 4 colon
5. Aggressive lung (NSCLC)

And now we’re seeing it in children.
Leukemia. Lymphoma. Sarcoma.

Over 100 published papers already confirm the link.
This is no longer a theory. It’s a body count.
Share this. The cover up is crumbling.

Email: [email protected]

#TurboCancer #COVIDVaccine #VaccineInjury #mRNA #Cancer #Lymphoma #MedicalFreedom #DiedSuddenly #VAERS #Pfizer #Moderna #WakeUp

[Joe Tippens @JoeTippensl]

Dr. Lee Merritt: “ANTI-PARASITIC DRUGS TREAT CANCER. DOCTORS WON’T TELL YOU — AND BIG PHARMA KNOWS IT.”

“Everything that CANCER likes… parasites like.
Everything CANCER hates… parasites hate.”

We don’t get sick from “bad luck.”
We get sick from radiation, poisons, and PARASITES.

Anti-parasitic drugs (Ivermectin, Fenbendazole) and herbs (wormwood, clove, black walnut hull) are curing cancer right now around the world.

Oncologists were never taught to use them. Instead they push toxic chemo and radiation that kills everything — hoping you survive.

Meanwhile, cheap antiparasitics + detox + zero-sugar diet are saving lives while “standard care” fails.

Common parasites and where they hide:
• Schistosomiasis (bladder)
• Liver flukes (liver & bile ducts)
• Toxoplasmosis (brain tumors, leukemia, lymphoma)
• Cryptosporidium (colorectal)
• Trichomonas (cervix & prostate)

Your “cancer” might be treatable with anti parasite drugs and herbs.
Why isn’t this front-page news?

Starve the parasites. Detox heavy metals. Ditch the sugar.
Your life could depend on it.

[Nicolas Hulscher, MPH @NicHulscher]

The LARGEST sunscreen-skin cancer study EVER conducted found sunscreen users faced FAR higher risks of EVERY major skin cancer.

📈INVASIVE MELANOMA: +292%
📈MELANOMA IN SITU: +258%
📈BASAL CELL CARCINOMA: +140%
📈SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA: +126%

Large increases in all major skin cancers can NOT be explained away by the "sunscreen paradox" given that lab tests found BENZENE, a known human CARCINOGEN, in 27% of sunscreen products tested.

Slathering rapidly absorbed carcinogens all over your body will unsurprisingly raise skin cancer risk.

[Dr. Dawn Michael @DawnsMission]

🚨 What if half the “tumors” doctors call cancer… aren’t cancer at all?

Dr. Bryan Ardis drops a line that should make every oncology textbook blush: “They’re not tumors — they’re parasitic egg sacs. ”He claims up to 50% of what gets labeled as cancerous tumors or polyps in his experience were actually clusters of parasite eggs — liver flukes, blood flukes, digestive invaders — quietly feeding off the host and forming mass-like structures that look identical on scans and even under the microscope to the untrained eye.

Here’s the part that hits hardest: Oncologists are never taught to look for parasites. Medical schools skip it. Pathologists aren’t primed for it. So when the mass shows up, the default diagnosis is cancer → chemo, radiation, the full toxic protocol.

Meanwhile a cheap antiparasitic (the same ivermectin that “mysteriously” shows activity against certain cancers in labs) might simply be killing the organism that was mimicking the disease the whole time. Ardis’s point is brutal and simple:

If you never look for the parasite, you will never find it.
And the patient never knows they might have been treated for the wrong thing. Worms laying hundreds of thousands of eggs a day.

Egg sacs that register as “malignant.”
An entire industry built on never asking the question.

Whether you buy the 50% figure or not, the core idea is unsettling as hell: Some of the most feared diagnoses on earth could, in a non-zero number of cases, be something far older, far simpler, and far cheaper to treat… if anyone was trained to see it.

Watch the clip. Then ask yourself why this conversation stays in the shadows.

The parasites don’t care about your textbooks.
They just keep laying eggs.

[Dr. Dawn Michael @DawnsMission]

SHOCKING: Cancer is NOT the disease.
It’s the symptom of your immune system already collapsing.

Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong just dropped a truth that rewrites everything we thought we knew about cancer and longevity: The real killer isn’t the tumor.
It’s when your Absolute Lymphocyte Count (ALC) — drops below 1,000 cells/μL. That’s lymphopenia.

We’ve spent 40+ years nuking the symptom with chemo and radiation… while those same treatments deliberately wipe out the exact cells that could have saved you. We treat the tumor and ignore the host. Your ALC is your immune army.
Low ALC = defenseless.

Now we can understand why there is an explosion in cancer since the Covid vaccine injection, because it lowers your immune system.

[Nicolas Hulscher, MPH @NicHulscher]

🚨COVID SHOTS INCREASE YOUR RISK OF 7 MAJOR CANCERS

Breast: +54%
Colon: +35%
Prostate: +69%
Bladder: +62%
Stomach: +34%
Lung: +53%
Thyroid: +35%

HUNDREDS of studies now confirm COVID-19 “vaccines” are one of the largest carcinogenic exposures in HISTORY.

[McCullough Foundation @McCulloughFund]

5,800 New Cancer Cases Every Day. One in Three Americans Will Be Diagnosed. And a Treatment Nobody Is Talking About.

2,114,000 projected new cancer diagnoses in 2026. 20 million Americans currently living with cancer. 40% of us will die from it. Meanwhile, a Nobel Prize-winning compound with over 100 pre-clinical studies showing anti-cancer mechanisms just posted an 84% clinical benefit rate in a real-world patient cohort — and the cancer centers are incentivized to ignore it.

Join the Fight: https://t.co/rvCeXmwbdp

Courtesy of The Lance Wallnau Show @lancewallnau

#MedicalFreedom

[The British Patriot @TheBritLad]

The UK government: “Pensions are the problem”.

UK State Pension: £12,500/yr for a lifetime of work.

Illegal migrant: £41,000/yr paid by the taxpayer. — 500+ arrivals every week.

Invaders get THREE TIMES MORE than
those who built the country.

Absolutely disgraceful.

[Mr. Pool @MrPool_QQ]

🔻 SUNSCREEN ENTERS YOUR BLOODSTREAM IN UNDER 24 HOURS. THE FDA CONFIRMED THIS IN 2019. THEY DID NOT PULL A SINGLE PRODUCT. THEY TOLD YOU TO KEEP APPLYING.

In January 2020, a randomized clinical trial published in JAMA found that six active sunscreen chemicals — including oxybenzone and avobenzone — absorb into the bloodstream after a single application. Not after years. After one use. At concentrations exceeding the FDA's own safety threshold by 180x to 500x.

The FDA did not recall them. They issued a statement: "Continue to use sunscreen."

Oxybenzone is a confirmed endocrine disruptor. It mimics estrogen. It crosses the placental barrier. It has been found in 97% of Americans tested. It is in breast milk. It is in amniotic fluid. It is in your children before they are born.

A former formulation chemist — 11 years at a top-3 sunscreen manufacturer:

"We had internal absorption data by 2014. Full transdermal penetration within 26 minutes of application. The compounds don't sit on the skin. They were never designed to. The delivery mechanism is identical to a pharmaceutical patch. We knew this. The mitigation strategy was never reformulation — it was public messaging. Keep the consumer applying. The margins on chemical sunscreens are 1,400% above production cost. Mineral alternatives cost 4x more to produce. The decision was financial. Every internal document confirmed that."

They told you the sun causes cancer. What they didn't tell you:

Vitamin D — produced only through direct sun exposure — is the single most critical regulator of immune surveillance against malignant cells. A 2023 meta-analysis confirmed: Vitamin D deficiency correlates with a 30-60% increased risk of colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers.

They blocked the one thing your immune system needs to fight cancer. Then sold you a chemical that enters your blood and mimics hormones. Melanoma rates have increased 320% since 1975 — the exact period sunscreen use became widespread.

The paradox is published. McGill University, 2023: "Sunscreen usage is climbing, but so are melanoma and skin cancer rates."

They didn't protect you from cancer. They removed your defense against it and charged you $14 a bottle.

15 minutes of direct sun daily. No screen. Arms and face exposed. Your body produces 10,000-20,000 IU of Vitamin D in that window — the amount they sell you in pills because they blocked the free version.

CODE: JAMA-2020-6CHEM / OXYBENZONE-97PCT / VIT-D-IMMUNE / MELANOMA-320-1975 / MCGILL-PARADOX-2023

⟁
They made you afraid of the sun so they could sell you a hormone disruptor and call it protection. The sun is free. That's why they taught you to fear it. Share this.

[Serbats @Serbats1]

@john322226 @Afroboyclingzy So what about Cristiano Ronaldo, he scored in 11 in a row and by your logic is a premier league associated player?

[Serbats @Serbats1]

@TheWorldOfHayes @stuey_beef What is your totally irrelevant point??

[Serbats @Serbats1]

@EdConwaySky @pennycheck Correct Ed - Where quantum chips are cooled—the mixture stabilizes at approximately 7% helium-3 (by mole fraction) and ~93% helium-4
Qatar though still supplies about 36% of worldwide of each

[Serbats @Serbats1]

@DrNeilStone "Officially 1st person to use word Covid"? When did this happen? I was the first person to use the word bullshitter! 🤝