People think that Monotheism is about one God, when it is actually about one king of the world. Religion IS war. Every single thing that Monotheisms claim as a divine revelation is a man-made lie to rule the world. You will never win this fight unless you expose the charade.
For decades, we’ve been told that “migrations” into India explain everything, from language to culture.
But what happens when biology flips the script?
Genetic studies on the humble house mouse (Mus musculus) are now revealing a striking pattern.
Populations of mice associated with early human settlements appear to have originated in the Indian subcontinent and then expanded westward into West Asia and eventually Europe.
This aligns with archaeogenetic data tracking commensal species that travel with humans.
Mice don’t migrate across continents on their ow.
They move with people, grains, and settlements.
So when mice show an east-to-west dispersal, from India toward regions like Iran, Mesopotamia, and into Europe, they are effectively acting as tiny biological witnesses to ancient human movement.
The implication is powerful.
Intead of a one-way influx into India, we may be looking at a much older and more complex pattern where populations, along with their ecological companions, expanded outward from the subcontinent.
When even mice are pointing westward, like the cows, it’s time to re-examine the direction of history itself.
The reason that today’s India is different is due to genocidal religions, i.e., Islam and Christianity. The British caused 100 million extra deaths between 1880-1920. But all traditions are still alive in their Parampara and they are being revived.
@VinayakKishore I hate to break it to you, but your 2026 modern India culture is not the same as the 4,500-year old Harappan culture. The Harappans would find more similarity with ancient Mesopotamia than with you.
Western historians approach history in a secular way because their religious history is a lie. Jews came from Egypt? No. Jesus did miracles? No. Their distrust is valid because their ancestors made false prophesies. Our trust is valid as our ancestors gave verifiable methods.
There is a very good reason why historians approach the past in a secular fashion, and this includes deeply religious historians.
So I want to talk about the value of the secular approach, and the NECESSITY of the secular approach to history.
Some people hear the word “secular” and think it means “anti-religious,” but that is not what the secular historical method means.
It means that historical arguments must be made using evidence and reasoning that do not depend on first accepting the truth of a particular religious tradition.
A historian can be a Christian, Jew, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, atheist, agnostic, or anything else. But they all agree that they must argue their points in a way that is accessible to people who do not already share their beliefs.
That is because history is a public discipline. Its claims must be open to examination, challenge, correction, and debate from anyone, anywhere.
1/
🚨 BOMBSHELL! Senator Bernie Sanders exposes the massive AI scam. He confirms big tech oligarchs literally stole humanity's collective knowledge, art, and research to build models without permission.
The elite class is executing the greatest wealth theft in human history!
ONE INDIAN FAMILY WAS RICHER THAN ALL OF ENGLAND THEN THEY HELPED BRITAIN CONQUER INDIA AND LOST EVERYTHING
“The Story of Jagat Seth”
In the 1750s, their assets were estimated at 140 million rupees roughly $1 Trillion in today's money. They had more cash than all of England's banks combined. The mighty Mughal Emperor in Delhi didn't just borrow from them; he was effectively their pensioner, surviving entirely on credit extended by this Rajasthani merchant family.
They controlled the Bengal mint, engineered the regional currency, and ran a continental "hundi" credit network that moved vast fortunes across thousands of miles without a single ounce of silver physically changing hands.
They were so massive that European trading empires genuinely debated whether Jagat Seth was one man or an entire corporation.
The Slap That Changed History 💥
In 1756, an impulsive new Nawab, Siraj-ud-Daulah, took power in Bengal. Suspicious of their massive influence, he demanded a tribute of 30 million rupees from Jagat Seth Mehtab Chand.
When the banker refused, the Nawab did the unthinkable: he struck the billionaire across the face in open court.
For a high-status elite family, this wasn't just an insult—it was a declaration of war. Mehtab Chand walked out of that courtroom and set into motion the most consequential, devastating act of financial engineering in Indian history.
To dethrone the Nawab, the Jagat Seths bankrolled a secret alliance between a disgruntled army general named Mir Jafar and Robert Clive of the British East India Company.
The family promised to underwrite the entire cost of the military expedition and guaranteed the massive bribes needed to buy off the Nawab's own generals.
On June 23, 1757, the Battle of Plassey began. The Nawab had 50,000 men; Clive had just 3,000. But the battle was over before it even started. Mir Jafar and his armies simply stood still and refused to fight—their loyalty had already been bought with Jagat Seth gold.
The Nawab was executed, the British marched into the treasury of Bengal, and the colonization of India began.
The Jagat Seths thought they had merely replaced a hostile ruler to restore business equilibrium. They had no idea they had just handed the keys of the subcontinent to a foreign empire.
The British didn't stay as hired muscle; they stayed as rulers. Once they seized Bengal's land revenues, they systematically dismantled the Seths' monopolies, abolished their financial systems, and cut off their networks. The indispensable family was suddenly just an inconvenience.
In 1763, a subsequent Nawab resisting British expansion, Mir Qasim, had Mehtab Chand and his cousin arrested. The two wealthiest men on the planet were bundled into sacks and thrown off the walls of Munger Fort into the crocodile-infested Ganges River. Their billions could not save them from the exact monster they helped create.
By the late 1800s, the family was surviving on a tiny British stipend of 1,200 rupees a month. By 1912, the direct line ended entirely.
Today, their mansion in Murshidabad is a quiet, forgotten museum where, occasionally, a lone gold coin still surfaces from the dirt.
The ultimate historical reminder : No amount of wealth can survive the destruction of your own nation.
अनुमन्ता विशसिता निहन्ता क्रयविक्रयी ।
संस्कर्ता चोपहर्ता च खादकश्चेति घातकाः ॥
- मनुस्मृतिः, ५.५१
One who permits (the slaughter), one who butchers, one who kills, one who buys and sells (the meat), one who cooks/prepares, one who serves, and one who eats, all these are the killers of animals (and share the equal sin).
I have a controversial and nuanced take on this. I agree with the spirit of this post while disagreeing with the content. Hindu theology does not say that the gods of other nations are demons, simply because they are foreign. On the other hand, it says that the wise call the truth by many names. The natural tendency of a Hindu mind when it travels abroad is to honour the local god there or syncretise him/her with a known Hindu god (which crudely is called Sanskritization). This is how most of the world was 2000 years ago. Greeks, Romans, Persians - all of these empire building powers honored the local gods of wherever they conquered, for the most part.
Nothing has happened to Hindus on this part. They have not changed their ancient mindset. But, the times have changed. The dominant power (geopolitical and demographic) now are not Greeks or Romans or Persians but Christianity and Islam which are theologically bigoted and declare that the gods of gentiles (all nations except Israel) are demons and satanically inspired.
Hindus should now realise that this ancient attitude is useless now and infact dangerous in the Christian and Islamic world. Whatever respect you show towards Jesus or Allah, a Christian or Muslim won’t reciprocate and in fact, he will double down on its bigotry of you because of the blasphemy that you have committed in their eyes (equating their so-called creator god with your so-called satanic demons).
Eg. 1 Corinthians 10
Therefore, my dear friends, flee from idolatry…. the sacrifices of pagans are offered to demons,not to God, and I do not want you to be participants with demons. You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons too; you cannot have a part in both the Lord’s table and the table of demons. Are we trying to arouse the Lord’s jealousy? Are we stronger than he?
Hindus should realise that the best thing they can do to engage with Christianity and Islam is by maintaining a healthy distance from them. Sure, the Bible has some nice verses, especially the Psalms. Sure, the Bible tells a very interesting and moving story (unlike another religious book that contains random ramblings of a rabble-rouser). Sure, Catholic and Orthodox art, architectures, and liturgies are aesthetically amazing to enjoy. But, so do the Harry Potter books and Lord of the Rings. You can enjoy these books but you don’t need to go out of the way to join a super-obsessed hardcore HP or LoTR fan club that believes that all other books are bad, just to demonstrate that you enjoy all kinds of books.
And it is not the bigotry of “some pastors” or “some imaams” who believe that the gods of gentiles are demons. If one reads the entire Bible, rather than cherry picked nice verses, it will become as clear as daylight that it is a core theological issue and one cannot change this by arguing one’s way out of it or syncretism.
I once watched a video on blackhead removal. Now, 20% of videos in my feed are on blackhead removals. It shows how dangerous social media is—it will show your confirmation bias till the end of time. The platform is DESIGNED to make money for X, even if hurts every user.
@sanjeevsanyal There is no cultural or intellectual commonality between Charvak and anything Vedic. Charvak rejected Shiva as a fabrication of priests to control the masses. The foundation of Indian thinking is rebirth and karma. Buddhists and Jains accept it, but Charvak rejected it.
@IndiaJyot Europeans don’t realize that for every finger they point at others, at least a thousand fingers point at them. By pointing fingers, they enlighten the world even more about their history. The strategy works in reverse, but they still don’t get it. Not too bright, eh?
In Oslo, a Norwegian journalist asked India's MEA Secretary why we should trust India.
It is a question worth answering, but first, a question worth asking back.
By what authority does Europe ask it?
Read the full thread. 1/12
“The link between word and world is human convention.” False. Mantras work. If the convention was arbitrary, mantras won’t work for one who doesn’t know the language. If Nagarjuna said that, he was echoing Darwinism. After that we only get materialism.
Around 1800 years ago, the Nyāya logicians set a trap for Nāgārjuna that looked unbeatable.
Their claim: the moment you say "svabhāva does not exist," you have already lost the argument.
Here is how he fought his way out. 🧵1/14
Did you know that ancient Greeks described Indian society as a land with no slaves, no written laws, and a king guarded by elite women warriors? When the Greek ambassador Megasthenes lived in India around 300 BC, what he saw completely amazed him.
One of his most shocking observations was how safely farmers lived. Megasthenes wrote that even during the bloodiest wars, farmers were treated as sacred. While armies fought nearby, soldiers would leave farmers completely alone to work their fields in peace.
Equally mind-blowing was the king’s security team. Emperor Chandragupta did not trust regular male soldiers to protect him. Instead, his inner palace corridors were guarded by a highly trained troop of armed women warriors.
Even the smartest people faced strict rules. The highest social class belonged to the Philosophers, whose job was to predict the weather and monsoons for the government. But there was a catch: if a philosopher’s predictions failed three times, they were legally banned from speaking for the rest of their life.
Furthermore, Megasthenes was stunned by how much Indians valued freedom. Coming from Greece and Rome, where slavery was brutal and widespread, he wrote in awe that all Indians were free and no one was treated as a slave.
Finally, the honesty of the people surprised him. He noted that in a massive military camp of 400,000 men, thefts almost never happened. Because people trusted each other so deeply, society ran smoothly without written contracts or law books, relying entirely on custom and word of mouth.
#archaeohistories
Duties are necessary and sufficient to fulfil rights, and rights are neither necessary nor sufficient to fulfil duties. Do your duties, and the cosmos will get you what you deserve, based on how well you did your duties. Demand your rights, and you will get nothing.
Thousands of years before ‘the Lady’ and ‘Aliens’…
Hinduism discussed a wide range of non-human intelligences that coexist with us…
Devas - luminous celestial intelligences
Asuras - powerful beings often associated with ego, domination, or material power
Nagas - serpent-associated subterranean/interdimensional beings
Yakshas - nature and treasure spirits
Gandharvas - musical/artistic celestial beings
Siddhas - spiritually advanced beings with extraordinary abilities
Rakshasas - chaotic or predatory entities
Our government is telling people to ‘read the Bible’ or ‘read Enoch’…
They should be telling people to read the Vedas and Upanishads.
Not many Indians know that Advaita had died in India during the 15th and 16th century Bhakti Movement. It was revived during British colonialism to mimic the Protestant Reformation, and it was thus called Hindu Reformation. Read and find out: https://t.co/Nw1lKmLGG0
@F_Gardner_1 Baka in Sanskrit means a stork or crane. It stands on one leg in water like an ascetic but as soon as a fish passes by, it dips its beak and eats the fish. In India, “baka bhagat” means a fake devout—standing as an ascetic only to eat fish. Baka Brahma means a fake priest. FYI.
@SatyamVada000 Quoting parts of verses to cheat people. Go cheat someone else. There are many waiting to be cheated. Parambrahma is arguing on X. LOL. Create a world, show the universal form. Nothing less.