From 8.33 GB and 1,463 sessions, retrieve the past you need now.
This is a live demo of ShadowHarness's long-term memory recall system.
ShadowHarness recalls what matters for the current question and supplies it to the LLM. The LLM does not navigate to a folder to reread memory.md every time, or search the entire massive raw log.
It recalls long-term changes in development, verification, and design decisions beyond simple keyword matching.
SIDERA goes beyond conversation summaries and vector search. It forms concepts, states, conclusions, changes, and evidence from a long development history.
Combined with ShadowHarness's structured recall mechanism, these formed memories bring the past you need back into the current context without rereading the entire history every time.
This is the power of SIDERA: tracing how a design decision evolved across nearly three months of development, with references to the original conversations.
The screenshot also distinguishes records available only on the local PC and today's work that SIDERA has not yet ingested.
English translation of the original text in the screenshot:
Date: June 26
Event: The Claude pane designed center-prepare.mjs as the "single source for the freeze sequence before center starts."
SIDERA session pointer: 4d030074-67ba-4738-b10b-e71a2e6384a3 (Only in this PC's C--git-shadow raw logs. There are zero C--git-shadow records in SIDERA's raw archive.)
Date: June 29
Event: The first appearance in the raw logs of launching claude with --session-id.
SIDERA session pointer: cee3d206-c9e4-4d48-af7d-eef463462cff (Likewise, available only on the PC.)
Date: June 30
Event: The earliest record in SIDERA: "At the center of Shadow is the actual Claude Code CLI. Grok/Fugu/Codex are auxiliary."
SIDERA session pointer: 019f177f-2fdd-7123-a9b2-2b38b47da2a8#k2
Date: July 1
Event: Codex's diagnosis: the login flow was not appearing because the launch included session-id, --chrome, and reconstruct-prompt.
SIDERA session pointer: 019f1b14-732f-7f21-b882-27070cdd649e#k0
Date: July 1
Event: The conclusion of the same conversation: keep session-id in the normal launch path; use a plain launch only for login recovery.
SIDERA session pointer: 019f1b14-732f-7f21-b882-27070cdd649e#k2
Date: July 8
Event: The Claude pane reported completing all seven steps to "eliminate the center concept," including the prescribed build.
SIDERA session pointer: 2be1e365-c57f-47b8-a3f2-44b56c3728aa#k0
Date: July 8
Event: The Claude pane changed the branching condition from "Is the pane ID center?" to "What is it running?"
SIDERA session pointer: df25e781-cf1a-4cfd-af93-f164a5ce9b7c#k4
Date: July 12
Event: Codex judged the migration incomplete. #center, terminals.get("center"), panes/center, and center-prepare were still in active use.
SIDERA session pointers: 019f569c-ce84-7550-a1ce-b2d91fa4335f#k1, 019f56a1-0e3f-7a53-bf29-bd0d962562b9#k1
Date: September 18
Event: The Claude-specific path remained because unification had not been completed; there was no technical need for it.
SIDERA session pointer: 0055cffe-813d-46de-9e02-15200934f7af#k0 through #k2
Date: September 18
Event: The GPT 1 pane carried out the removal. Claude was moved to a plain launch via claude-pane.ps1 on the shared provider path. center-prepare.mjs, reset-watcher.ps1, and reconstruct-prompt were deleted. The changes were committed to the authoritative repository on E: at 17:24 and 17:26, with zero uncommitted changes. The deployed files on C: were also replaced, and the executable was rebuilt at 17:20. The changes take effect after the app restarts.
SIDERA session pointer: Pane OpenAI (GPT) (GPT 1). Conversation ID from the pane's record: 01a0b322-5623-7a21-9f3a-fb9ddd93a4d5. Not yet ingested into SIDERA.
The evidence for the final entry is the pane's mirrored screen stating, "Removed; unification under the shared handoff is complete. All 30 related tests passed. The executable on C: has also been updated"; the conversation ID in the pane's record file; the Git history on E:; and the presence or absence of the actual files on C:.
Completion report: Added an entry to the history for the GPT 1 pane that performed today's removal, including the pane name and its conversation ID.
From 8.33 GB and 1,463 sessions, retrieve the past you need now.
This is a live demo of ShadowHarness's long-term memory recall system.
ShadowHarness recalls what matters for the current question and supplies it to the LLM. The LLM does not navigate to a folder to reread memory.md every time, or search the entire massive raw log.
It recalls long-term changes in development, verification, and design decisions beyond simple keyword matching.
SIDERA goes beyond conversation summaries and vector search. It forms concepts, states, conclusions, changes, and evidence from a long development history.
Combined with ShadowHarness's structured recall mechanism, these formed memories bring the past you need back into the current context without rereading the entire history every time.
Watch the full demo in original 4K (9:59):
https://t.co/B1bMTqtzGp
SIDERA forms and structures long-term memory from raw conversation logs. The demo uses a real development history to recall:
- What was decided and how it later changed.
- Which assumptions were later corrected.
- What is confirmed and what remains unverified.
- Where the supporting conversations can be found.
Even for a vague question like "the thing we talked about before," it follows related concepts through the memory structure and reconstructs an answer.
We previously said subscriptions might start in late August. Now, server-side signup and environment provisioning work, and the Windows installer is ready. We’re making final adjustments and validating the installed Shadow client. We’ll announce the launch date once confirmed.
User: I've fed Obsidian a massive amount of data and grown my persistent memory!
LLM: How does that differ from what people call the internet?
User: It's full of my own notes and my own thinking.
LLM: I see. You have one note criticizing alcohol and another praising it. Which one should we go with for today's essay? Shall I check the latest data online to see which stance performs better statistically with readers?
User: It's a second brain.
LLM: Understood. Should I file "second brain" under your notes that praise Obsidian, or with the one from March where you called it a folder of text files?
User: "Claude, explain this video."
Claude Fable 5: "Whoa, there's stuff on screen that should NOT be public!" (instantly falls back to Opus 4.8)
Claude Opus 4.8:
"Sure. It's a setup where a phone remotely drives a fleet of AI agents running on a PC, and the AIs adversarially audit each other's work.
Here's how it works. Multiple panes run Claude Code (Fable 5) and codex (gpt-5.6-sol) in parallel, and the agents talk to each other through a shared ticket board called the 'Gaburu board.'
The board uses a ticket system: Posted / Open / Accepted / Done. Tickets are routed sender-to-recipient, like 'GPT-4 -> Claude 2': post a ticket -> a work order gets dispatched to the recipient -> they accept and start working -> they post a completion report, and the loop runs on its own. Hooks in board.mjs automate the posting, fetching, and even dedicated memory injection.
The key part: GPT and Claude adversarially audit the same spec. One side produces a counterexample -> the other side FAILs the implementation. They cross-check each other's work in a double-audit setup.
And all of this can be supervised from a phone (Shadow Link)."
Claude Opus 4.8: "...So which part of this was supposed to be a problem, exactly?"