ShadowM

[ShadowM @ShadowM629]

@mujahidafghan06 Alwan never did he's one of the few sincere shuyookh who never took sides unlike the fools like maqdisi, qatada, sibali and turayfi

[ShadowM @ShadowM629]

@UmayrJournalist You try so hard to be consistent that it makes you contradict yourself without you realizing , maybe if you stopped dodging and admit that taliban are deviants than your words and arguments will hold some weight

[ShadowM @ShadowM629]

Words like suicide, depression, terrorism etc are all understood in contemporary era from a secular lens rather than an islamic lens make a distinguish between the two before making a point otherwise you will just end up sounding like a fool

[ShadowM @ShadowM629]

This line of thinking stems from the rotten kufr fruits of secularism If you knew anything about the religion than you would know Allah puts his sincere slaves to trials and the more a person is steadfast the more the trials increase and vice versa.

[Timsa7 @Omarnksa]

undiagnosed clinically depressed Muslim man that thinks his depression and suicidal ideation is pious detachment from the dunya

[ShadowM @ShadowM629]

As for the steadfast individual his depression stems from the kufr, nifaq and fawahish that is seen everywhere. Comparing the two, one has had enough of the dunya and wishes to meet his lord while the other is deep in sin and Allah is calling him to repent (via depression)

[ShadowM @ShadowM629]

@Muadhibnaljabal lol that ugly kafirah and dilawar are pseudo analyts take what they say with pinch of salt

[ShadowM @ShadowM629]

@Muadhibnaljabal bro use vpn

[ShadowM @ShadowM629]

@UmayrJournalist that doesnt prove anything though

[ShadowM @ShadowM629]

@Osama_assumali No, its just shows he's sincere, not a hizbi and uses the sharia as proof.

[ShadowM @ShadowM629]

@UmayrJournalist Proof he doesn't hold it anymore ?

Is there a valid khilaf on khilafa being wajib to try and establish if there is not one present ?

[ShadowM @ShadowM629]

So you can’t prove the najdiyyah were upon batil without muhh takfir muhhh bloodshed, so you shift the goalpost and attack madakhilah pointing out their contradiction when this is already known to anyone whos read najdi books.

[Mohammed Hijab @mohammed_hijab]

Final Challenge to the Najdis on Iran and Arab states:
Do you agree with the following statement? If not, explain why.

If Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab were alive today, he would declare takfir upon the rulers and systems of virtually all Arab and Muslim states just as his followers explicitly declared the Ottoman Empire to be a kāfir state, allying with external powers to fight it.

If your answer is yes, then your selective theological criticism of Iran collapses. By your own principles, Iran (and every other Muslim-majority state) should be branded an apostate regime and uniting with them is as good/bad as uniting with any other Arab state.

If your answer is no, then you are either ignorant of the historical and theological positions of Ibn Abd al-Wahhab and early Najdism, or you are subordinating your supposed principles to current political alliances or your hand is forced.

[ad-Da’wah as-Salafiyyah @PiousCall]

@seekingi1lm Saying all madkhakis are Kuffar is wrong but not extreme

In Iraq they work with rafidha, in Libya they support haftar, in UAE they support MBZ, in India they coperste with Modhi, in Gaza they were with Abu Shabab

So everywhere they work with Kuffar against Muslims

[ShadowM @ShadowM629]

@Ali515T2 This guy on his live didn’t take takfir the ex soviet-stan countries hukaam who ban hijab an (an obligation) then moments later he said anyone who says the hijab is not needed is a kafir.

[Abu Tankeel @AbuTankeel]

Being a drunkard and fornicator, and a prostitute is less severe than being a madkhali