@Johnm1291@darwintojesus Even if that were true, the problem there is the superseding of rights, not the rights themselves.
And it's not true that that's inevitable and it's not like there aren't plenty of tyranical authorities that don't base themselves on human rights.
@Johnm1291@darwintojesus I don't think that's what rights are. I'm just talking down to you because you're retarded.
And the idea of individual humans having rights is the best defence against those things.
@Tsar_Martyr If a Christian tries this on you just tell them that they are actually Muslim as the Quran says all humans have innate knowledge of the truth of Islam.
If they deny this, just say 'I don't believe you'
@allegiantfaith@DeeWaynee94 Does a thing have meaning because it's rooted god's "objective" nature or is a thing rooted in his nature because its meaningful? And then what makes it meaningful? God's opinion?
@darwintojesus There is no observation of design By "information" I assume you mean DNA, which evolved.
"Fine-tuning" has explanations other than God.
Intelligibility is necessary for god not the other way round
YOUR god specifically does have evidence of its non-existence
@NotEvolution1@DivinelyDesined Correct.
As opposed to the retarded alternative where an all knowing God created a water dwelling creature that needs to breath air.