@Titusa7r4@sushi2dayo@JohnDoeTheDoe99@HanTheElder@johnholmes555 That is correct. This suggests that women lack agency and aren’t smart enough to make decisions like these and it would then follow that women shouldn’t have the same rights as men and should be treated more similarly to children.
@sushi2dayo@JohnDoeTheDoe99@HanTheElder@johnholmes555 “Dependent on the abuser” now you’re shifting the goal post. First it was “she didn’t consent”, now it’s “she did consent, but had an attachment to her abuser” this is why people are over this believe all women shit.
@dawgfoid Not saying it isn’t possible at all, I was speaking on the increased risk of those things because she was cherry picking certain mutations that men’s genes carry which is at a rate that’s considered statistically insignificant
@woealoe@GirlyScouts You’re literally proving hypergamy and female looks delusion by thinking the vast majority of dudes are ugly lmfao or at least ugly relative to the female population
@GirlyScouts These are correlations between the risk of autism and parents age. They don’t control for other factors that alter the findings. These aren’t cause and effect studies.
I’ve already addressed that point 5 times now and you still don’t know how stats work.
@GirlyScouts@Oopidoopu Are you actually this dense? Autism and cancer are increasing because our food and water supply have been poisoned. A child with a worse immune system is more likely to develop cancer you buffoon as well as digestive issues which lead to malnourishment.
@GirlyScouts Millions of children were analyzed over the course of a decade, tf you mean “not done correctly”💀 those studies used in the meta analysis were also conducted in the 2010s and had smaller samples 💀💀💀
@GirlyScouts@Oopidoopu The rate at which men pass down those disorders is already considered statistically insignificant. Why are you hinging on this so much? Why don’t you address that c sections babies have worse immune systems or chemicals in food and water increases the risk of cancer and autism?
@GirlyScouts The studies were done in the 2010s which wasn’t even that long ago and they’re far larger than the studies used in the meta analysis. It’s not cope, there have been studies done on it.
Thats because autism isn’t purely genetic and cancer certainly isn’t mostly genetic either
@GirlyScouts@Oopidoopu Older women often need c sections to deliver which ends up causing long term damage to a child’s immune system which makes them far more vulnerable to diseases than the likelihood of men passing on a genetic mutation
@GirlyScouts Which study? The ones I gave actually show statistic significance for my side, your meta analysis doesn’t. The rate at which men pass on genetic disorders is even more statistically insignificant because men in their 70s only have 4% of their sperm carrying those things.
@GirlyScouts Your own study debunks you because the risks are 1.47 and 1.51 which is considered statistically insignificant which proves my point that there is no strong correlation with the father specifically
@GirlyScouts@Oopidoopu The vast majority of the times the mutations are insignificant and don’t end up becoming an issue until their 70s where 4-5% of sperm carries potential harmful mutations
@GirlyScouts The largest study we have on this analyzed 4 mill children and found that every 5 year increase in age for the mother increased the risk by 18% compared to 11% from father. A study that analyzed 400k children showed that mother’s risk of passing autism increases exponentially
@GirlyScouts Both parents factor into autism. With fathers that risk doesn’t increase until they’re 40 while it starts at 30 with mothers. This point is also so moot because environmental factors arguably play a bigger role.