@markessien@mwfowlie@SteveStuWill Here you go sir, you can download a list of 709 genes associated with intelligence: https://t.co/Mx5weCPROf
This is supplementary data #6 taken from the following study:
https://t.co/zDfQQ7MsbA
@yaggiuand@thesupermanmx Other than processing speed, they're in the 80s.
Either way you initially said that IQ only measures one type of intelligence. If you claim that verbal comprehension, visual processing, etc are subtypes of the one type of intelligence, then what is that "type" of intelligence?
@yaggiuand@thesupermanmx "heavily" affected by the environment is a bit strong for something that is 80% genetic when measured in adulthood.
https://t.co/E6b6wQmvxG
Also see:
https://t.co/ou2RdzL6b2
Either way, IQ being affected by the environment is not related to the validity of IQ tests.
@yaggiuand@thesupermanmx I did not say that. That's how you interpreted it. It has high validity as a measure of intelligence.
As to your other point, yes environment is a factor, but not brain training. Brain training has not been found to meaningfully changed IQ scores.
@yaggiuand@thesupermanmx Whether there's "one way" to measure intelligence is again, irrelevant. Regarding a "true" measure of intelligence... Nobody serious even talks like that. It is subjective and emotional language. But whether there's a "measure with validity"... For that, we have a consensus.
@yaggiuand@thesupermanmx Dude, they're generally in the .80s-. 90s. I didn't hide anything π€¦π½ββοΈ it just wasn't in the image.
Researchers' disagreement on the *best* way to measure intelligence does not change the fact that it does measure a construct of *various cognitive abilities* (intelligence).
@yaggiuand@thesupermanmx I'm not arguing semantics, I'm arguing the concept. If you're saying it measures one type 'of smaller subtypes" then please explain what type of intelligence it measures.
@yaggiuand@thesupermanmx You repeatedly claimed IQ is βone type of intelligence,β which is demonstrably false. You didn't do the minimum homework, such as asking "what is an IQ test" before forming an opinion. Not understanding the statistics is one thing. But at least know why you don't know.
@yaggiuand@thesupermanmx 2/2
It is quite reasonable to call that factor IQ... Given that it is a factor representing performance on various types of intelligence. In your next reply you said we would need a series of tests that focus on different aspects of intelligence. That's what an IQ test *is*
@yaggiuand@thesupermanmx 1/2
As I suspected, you clearly do not understand what you are writing about. Way out of your element here. g is the result of the correlations between various cognitive abilities, showing a common factor accounting for variance across their performance.