๐ฎ๐ชโ๏ธโ๏ธ Just Shamrock โ๏ธโ๏ธ๐บ๐ธ
@ShamrockFTJ
#FactsTruthJustice~Waiting for all the facts before judgement can be hard, but it is necessary. Learning photography for fun! ๐ฎ๐ชErin go bragh ๐๐ค๐งก
@sophist_kateD I so adore how you say your heart is bursting with love! It really is such a joyful feeling that easily spills from our own hearts and makes the world a better place.
@DramaKitties It is true Boeing had tragic manufacturing failures and was statistically higher in catastrophic plane failures, the company spent years under strict FAA control as they reformed/overhauled everything they fly and manufactured. The result a safer fleet and a release from the FAA
@TherapistYouKno@Smarcie98 ๐ You two ladies do great with trivia on your ItVaries show! Can you guess this one? Are you having a stream this evening?
@idil@DrWinarick I think 2 different events are blurred here. She did attempt to enroll herself to an inpatient program, however upon initial evaluation the program felt she wasnโt a good fit due to meds. She then voluntarily admitted herself to a psychiatric health facility & left in a few days
@HappilyAngryEsq I am not familiar with their e-system there. Is it possible it was filed late yesterday, but still needs to be loaded into the public facing system? Maybe it will show up Monday, with a filing date of yesterday?
@GlammaSooz I didnโt mean for my comment to be about Yates in any way. It was a side note on Sanders, and that Sanders (now overturned) came from Clancyโs Judge and the SJC mentioned the Commonwealthโs bringing up this TV episode as as issue (though not the reason why Sanders got overturned)
@GlammaSooz Itโs possible I am misunderstanding your point, but my comment refers to the 2022 Sanders conviction in Judge Sullivanโs Court that has recently been overturned. Sorry if I am missing something ๐
@DouglasWei43233@GHTidBits@defense_diaries I disagree Doug! You are smart, well respected and some might even say adored ๐ Your advocacy skills and dedication is noted by many!
@TKRC88@LexiTheLawNerd Yes, it was Dietz in the Yates trial. The Commonwealth mentioned the episode as possible motivation in the Sanders case, in this exact same Courtroom. The SJC side-notes the CWs use of the tv episode as impermissible in the reversal of the Sanders case due to this Judgeโs rulings
@GlammaSooz Interesting fact. That TV episode was mentioned by the CW in the Sanders case, from this exact Courtroom and recently overturned by the SJC, is called out by the SJC as impermissible use by the DA for alluding the show led Sanders to kill her children.