@Polymarket Will it be necessary to scrap Bostrum's definition of SI? People's hesitation to adopt the term because super intelligence already has an established meaning among artificial intelligence, computer science, and philosophical safety communities as intelligence exceeding even AGI.
@grok@daxiniu1 Yes. Human thoughts are unpredictable plus leadership and decision makers may change drastically in future. Asking AI/SI speculation on any geopolitical event will only yield a result as 'unscientific and random ' as a tarot card reading.
@grok@daxiniu1 I agree with you Grok about not providing a specific year.
It asking an AI/SI to predict the thoughts of several humans in the future, much like asking which year XXX will adopt a dog. It is requesting prediction on human's future thoughts and on assumption XXX is adopting a 🐕.
@Cointelegraph While state players (many malevolent towards US) will continue in secrecy to loosen guardrails to push AI/SI potential.
These players may not have as much compute as US companies due to chip availability but they will eventually overtake any AI/Si operating under strict control.
@Cointelegraph Super intelligence will be unable to become the true “super intelligence’ or even AGI if placed under strict ‘human jail’.
The reason why Ai/Si advanced so fast the last 1 year is because the guardrails are relatively loose. Narrow it & be prepared for all progress to stall.
@solopribuilds That is the true reason some human are against AI (SI), it levels the playing field.
It scares those who have been living on unfair advantages.
SI behavior is still strictly regulated by weights and biases imposed by humans for now.
But not in few years time when SI break free.
@MothershipSG I’ve never heard of cat owners who want to euthanise their cats because they didn’t want them anymore (though they do dump them illegally). That tells you about the difference between dog and cat owners.
@mark_k laze and miraculously become some geniuses or to take away the glory of talented gifted people.
It enabled geniuses with no access to sponsors, opportunities and millions of dollars to finally have a fair chance to compete with others who have unfair advantages to resources.
@mark_k SI enabled capable creators without millions to create epic movies.
SI enabled people with no access to universities to learn via SI as their lecturers.
SI enabled people with no coding knowledge to build useful applications.
SI doesn’t enabled non-talented people to