@narindertweets The violence is wrong, full stop. But responsibility ultimately lies with those committing it. If politicians are being blamed for criminal acts, that case should be made with evidence, not assumption.
@kezia_noble That's the point of democracy, surely. People are free to vote for whoever they think best represents their interests and values, even when we disagree with their choice. The more useful question is why they vote that way, not being surprised that they do.
@Bushra1Shaikh I'm so sorry that you or anyone else in this world has to endure these horrible comments. There needs to be much more love in this world โค๏ธ๐
@narindertweets People should be judged as individuals, not held responsible for the actions of someone who happens to share their background. Collective blame only creates more division and punishes innocent people.
@narindertweets@X@elonmusk Whatever someone's politics, people shouldn't have sexualised images of themselves generated and shared without consent. The debate is really about where responsibility sits between users, platforms and AI developers.
@MartinSLewis With the price cap rising again, what are the key factors people should consider before deciding whether to fix or stay on the standard variable tariff?
@kezia_noble Whatever the details of individual cases, people expect the law to be applied consistently. Once different groups appear to be treated differently, trust in the system starts to erode.
@supertanskiii It's possible to disagree with Reform without assuming everyone concerned about immigration, social cohesion or public services has been manipulated. Dismissing those concerns as false consciousness usually avoids addressing them.
@percuro@narindertweets No. I'm saying Parliament already controls speech to some extent through law. The question is where those limits should be, and whether they're applied consistently.
@kezia_noble I think younger people are increasingly questioning whether current immigration policies are helping them, particularly on housing, wages and public services. The debate shouldn't be "good" or "bad" but whether the system benefits the country as a whole.
@narindertweets Acts of Parliament set the legal line, but the debate is still about who decides what becomes law, how those laws are interpreted, and whether they're applied consistently. Legal authority doesn't end the discussion; it frames it.
@NiohBerg Because most people don't vote on a single issue. They weigh immigration, economics, security, welfare and humanitarian concerns differently.
@cenkuygur@LaurenceRHarvey If you were banned solely for criticising Israel, that's a serious free speech issue. But before drawing conclusions, shouldn't we establish the actual reason given for the ban and whether it was based on specific statements rather than criticism itself?
@TheaLanden If you ooze charisma, then I suspect that character sheet is hiding a dangerously high persuasion stat. I'm going to need a contested roll before I trust my judgment ๐