Shane Ray

believer, advocate, lover

[Shane Ray @ShaneRay_MT]

@MrVegasMusic @MarkJGolding @Delroychuckjm These MPs are super narcissistic. It doesn’t even make sense.

[Shane Ray @ShaneRay_MT]

@LisaLam88628518 @ESPNNBA Kmt! Lies

[Shane Ray @ShaneRay_MT]

@integrityja And like that- it seems like a phone call make and over the weekend people have to clear up their boss thing and file. Got to respect it.

[Shane Ray @ShaneRay_MT]

@sadheatlifer @NBA__Courtside And the converse is also true

[Shane Ray @ShaneRay_MT]

@JamaicaGleaner @kimzTm Gleaner can’t really say they don’t understand the parliament’s procedures, which have been written down long before the current speaker. It’s one thing to disagree, it’s another to act as if the decision was not grounded in parliamentary procedures.

[Shane Ray @ShaneRay_MT]

@chadwikspencejm Red herring bro! Distraction from the apparent typos in the standing orders that prevents them from abiding by it.

[Shane Ray @ShaneRay_MT]

@KingBrad_ Red herring - they can’t argue the issue so they point to marital status. It’s because she is married why they can’t abide the standing orders. If she divorce him, the standing orders will immediately become much clearer.

[Shane Ray @ShaneRay_MT]

So the issue about following the standing the order, all of which are written in the book long before she got there is because she is the PM’s wife? This is what you call a red herring, a fallacy, a literary device to distract you from the total disorder by OPP like Burke et al.

[sean @ji_er684]

The Speaker of the House should not be the sitting Prime Minister's wife. 🎯

[Shane Ray @ShaneRay_MT]

@ML_Simms1 Is it personal attacks to call her out or identify her pattern of disrespect? What you identify has flooodgates seems to me to be outrage.

[Shane Ray @ShaneRay_MT]

@kenyatta_pow Radar is about who said it - not some no name on Twitter but- a sitting MP on a popular podcast. Show me a colleague saying that about her.

[Shane Ray @ShaneRay_MT]

@kenyatta_pow Grasping at straws with this what-about-ism. It’s not the same and you know it.

[Shane Ray @ShaneRay_MT]

@ja_cynic Yup! Cheap trick

[Shane Ray @ShaneRay_MT]

@chenae876 That’s it. I hate to even respond to this crassness but jealousy feels accurate.

[Shane Ray @ShaneRay_MT]

@Errolmcneil1 When I heard Burchell claim there are rumors about her and the PM I knew this was about her hatred for Juliet.

[Shane Ray @ShaneRay_MT]

And this is why people are confused.

[Shane Ray @ShaneRay_MT]

Hence per standing order- I.e parliament internal business

[Kenyatta FORTIS4EVER Powell @kenyatta_pow]

This is nonsense when the Courts themselves have said over and over again that Parliament's internal proceedings is Parliament's business. The courts seem pretty certain that they can do their work and Parliament can get on with its internal proceedings at the same time.

[Shane Ray @ShaneRay_MT]

The Sub Judice rule as applied in parliament per the standing order has nothing to do with enjoining but rather prejudice, political influence and fairness of the proceedings.

[Kenyatta FORTIS4EVER Powell @kenyatta_pow]

The FLA report is being suppressed. I think we all know why it's being suppressed, and that reason has nothing to do with the sub judice rule. And for the last time, the sub judice rule can only enjoin the specific parties in a court proceeding.

[Shane Ray @ShaneRay_MT]

@JamaicaObserver Weekly walk out by opposition. Not releasing a report that might prejudice a proceeding is not only reasonable- it’s fair.