SharTee

Northerner in the Smoke.

[SharTee @SharFree61]

@John78239484198 @JacquiDeevoy1 Or finally undermine the one ‘brown’ religious culture generally respected by all because of their usual gentleness and obvious willingness to integrate with and contribute positively to British society? Just a wondering.

[SharTee @SharFree61]

@JacquiDeevoy1 If we look back - journalists and media generally swarm family/friends, schools neighbours for interview after such tragedies - to the point of harassment. This has been noticeable in its absence for quite some time. I admit that it’s made me question. I put nothing past ‘them’.

[SharTee @SharFree61]

@TheGriftReport @JohnARead A proper vote winner that one, fella.

[SharTee @SharFree61]

@TammySloan14 “De-fission”?

[SharTee @SharFree61]

@Movie_Xtra1 Thanks

[SharTee @SharFree61]

@VerumInvenire @drdankeown And you can substantiate this how?

[SharTee @SharFree61]

@MickeyMcqueen Stop this BS.

[SharTee @SharFree61]

@Jennyq88Q @ArturNadol7566 It’s there. At the foot of the post

[Artur Nadolny @ArturNadol7566]

SEVEN WHISTLEBLOWERS. ONE DEAD WOMAN. ONE KNIGHTHOOD FOR THE MAN WHO IGNORED THEM

In 1999, seven care workers at a BUPA care home in Bromley reported abuse of vulnerable elderly residents.

They followed every rule. They submitted formal evidence. They did everything the law required.

Edna had no family. She was entirely defenceless. Seven people risked everything to speak up for her.

Every one of them lost their job.

Edna died.

The man who received the evidence and chose to act on none of it became Sir Des Kelly OBE, a government advisor on elderly care, head of the National Care Forum, and a welcome contributor to CQC @CareQualityComm policy on the very sector where his inaction let an abuser harm more people.

You genuinely cannot make this up.

These seven became known as the BUPA7. They were the first people in UK history to use the Public Interest Disclosure Act (PIDA), the law that was supposed to protect whistleblowers. The law that failed them so badly that other workers across the country saw what happened and quietly decided it was safer to say nothing.

That silence has cost lives. It still does.

Eileen Chubb @CompassnInCare, one of the BUPA7, has spent every year since building Compassion in Care and supporting over 13,000 whistleblowers. She has seen the exact same pattern repeat itself across the NHS, social care, finance, construction, and local government.

Report wrongdoing. Lose your job. Watch the wrongdoing continue untouched.

Even if a whistleblower wins at an employment tribunal under PIDA, nobody is legally required to fix the problem they reported. The abuse can just carry on. The risks remain. The tribunal hands out a payout and everyone goes home.

Mid Staffs. Gosport. Rotherham. Bristol Babies. Winterbourne View. In every single one of these cases, someone knew. Someone spoke up. And the system destroyed them for it while the wrongdoing continued.

Robert Francis produced his Freedom to Speak Up review in 2015. Joint investigations by Compassion in Care and @PrivateEyeNews later revealed that the CQC @CareQualityComm lied to the public for years, falsely claiming it had closed 100 care homes when the real number was two.

The same CQC had invited Des Kelly's input into its policy on the sector he had already failed so catastrophically.

Nothing meaningfully changed.

Eileen Chubb is calling for Edna's Law. A law that would make it a criminal offence to ignore a genuine whistleblower, put wrongdoers in front of a criminal court instead of an employment tribunal, protect whistleblowers as protected witnesses, and force corrective action on the actual wrongdoing.

The State would prosecute. Not the whistleblower, who is currently expected to become a legal expert and fight experienced barristers alone.

The petition has 7,417 signatures. It has been running for a while.

It is addressed to Sir Keir Starmer @Keir_Starmer.

If you want to protect the public, you protect the people willing to protect the public.

Sign the petition. Share it. Write to your MP.

Because the alternative is just waiting for the next inquiry. The next preventable scandal. The next name we will all say we should have done something about.

Sign the petition

https://t.co/bmEI8vHq7w

[SharTee @SharFree61]

@ToonDazza @jimmytwhu 👍

[SharTee @SharFree61]

@PipilasM86411 Stop this

[SharTee @SharFree61]

@mike2c83 @elonmuskcrew That’s a despicable comment.
I ask you to substantiate your claim

[SharTee @SharFree61]

@elonmuskcrew @EngCivilSoldier Oh dear.
Do they know the usual Appleby crowd?
I think not

[SharTee @SharFree61]

@SkyNews If that’s your top duty?
Then know you are failing miserably.

[SharTee @SharFree61]

@ogerly99630 @maximumpain333 The launch of ‘Disclosure’ approaches.
Hollywood and the ‘Spielberg clan’ doin’ the usual PR.

[SharTee @SharFree61]

@NiallHarbison @superdupedoodle Thank You 🙏💖

[Chris Wick @ChrisWickNews]

His job is to engineer civil unrest, delivering a Digital ID mandate for his WEF handlers.

This isn’t about popularity — and it never was.

What’s unfolding feels increasingly calculated, not accidental.

A steady push of policy after policy, each one framed as efficiency, safety, or modernization — yet collectively pointing toward something far more rigid underneath.

Digital identity systems. Centralized verification frameworks. Expanding requirements to access basic services in an increasingly monitored environment.

Supporters call it progress. Critics see something else taking shape: a quiet tightening of control wrapped in the language of convenience.

And the most unsettling part isn’t just the direction — it’s how normal it’s being made to feel while it happens.

Because once these systems are fully embedded, walking them back becomes almost impossible.

At that point, it’s no longer about debate.

It’s about structure.

[SharTee @SharFree61]

@thespicypatriot Thank you 🙏

[SharTee @SharFree61]

@GBNEWS @SandraWeeden September 2027????

[SharTee @SharFree61]

@CathyMo41926708 @RestoreOrkney @tonx10 Me too.
Hence I declined

[SharTee @SharFree61]

@AngelInvestGuy @tpe365 @MaximusChud Check these new low number accounts popping up all over to instigate argument.