22 years ago, I was a broke college kid flipping domain names.
The only reason I could sell to strangers online was: https://t.co/TNL8f4G6VU
It was the trust layer that made deals possible. Even when buyer/seller were in different countries.
Fast forward to today. Vertical marketplaces have exploded:
- @Flippa for websites and businesses
- @GoDaddy for domains
- @chrono24 for luxury watches
- Countless Web3 marketplaces for NFTs, tokens, and services
Yet #escrow for #crypto #payments is still stuck in the past.
The pain today:
- Stablecoins moved over $1T last year, but most crypto escrow options lack the familiar Web experience customers expect. Clear checkout, instant status, simple disputes, enterprise APIs
- Marketplaces rely on manual wallet transfers, risky P2P trust, and fragile bridge flows
- Existing escrow tools are fiat-first, slow, and require full KYC for every user
- Cross chain without friction is missing. Buyers should pay from any wallet or exchange and sellers should settle on their chain without bridge anxiety or network mismatch.
Why now:
- Stablecoins are becoming a mainstream settlement rail for B2B and marketplaces.
- Cross‑chain commerce is growing across digital goods and tokenized assets.
- Marketplaces want programmable trust that feels familiar to users and maintainable for engineers.
That is why, @VibeWeb3 , Ajmal Muhammad (https://t.co/rvNP6ttrOB) and I (https://t.co/HxRcvRWCze) are building , the crypto-native trust layer for high-value deals:
✅ Multi‑chain stablecoin deposits across #Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, #Solana, and #Tron
✅ Automatic bridge handling with a full on‑chain audit trail
✅ API‑first and embeddable UI for integration in hours
✅ Delegated compliance so partners control KYC and KYB
Trust is timeless. The rails have changed - https://t.co/YgxKoGXC9I makes on‑chain escrow feel as intuitive as the internet you already trust.
The 6-month sentiment shift on Indian finance (Twitter) is wild.
2025 Bull Market: "Vishwaguru rising, SIP zindabad, Nifty to 50k, bears are crying!" 🚀📈
2026 Reality Check: "Macros suck, FIIs are fleecing us, our only innovation is cheap delivery aka @ZeptoNow@letsblinkit , buy USD and flee." 📉💸
Turns out everyone is a long-term investor until the market sideways-drifts for two quarters. 😂🤡
$BTC dumped all the way to $85,790.
Our shorts from the analysis I posted yesterday are printing, enjoy the gains if you took the trade with me.
Right now, Bitcoin is holding ~$85,790 support, but it's also a mid-range level (B/C setup).
The lows/local bottom look weak, as they are grinding up. I'd like to take them out, and look for longs after reversals at the ~$83,000 rangelow.
The A-setup for me is printing new local lows, and long the reversal after the sweep. This impulse looks exhausted.
Price left a huge gap, so looking locally for a scalp-long after gaining ~$87,700 (1H resistance) is legit. More risky though.
Previous ~$90,300 rangelow is now resistance, and valid for longs after the gain or shorts after confirmation.
Enough opportunities.
BREAKING: Nasdaq just asked the SEC to approve tokenized stocks.
Translation: the biggest exchange in the world wants "real" equities like Apple, Tesla, Nvidia to be on-chain, under US regulation.
Why it matters even if you don’t follow markets:
- Settlement that used to take 2 days could happen instantly
- Layers of costly intermediaries could disappear
- Anyone, anywhere, could get direct access to US equities
If regulators allow it, the rules of who gets to invest, how fast money moves, and who profits from friction all change at once.
It’s a "regime change" operation. And it starts at the very center of Wall Street.
VCs are world-class at saying “NO” without saying no. The greatest hits:
1) I liked it, my partners didn’t → If they had conviction, they’d fight.
I2) f you get a lead, we’ll follow → Translation: zero conviction, waiting to piggyback.
3) Show traction and we’ll invest → Even with traction, they’ll ghost. Filter, not promise.
4) We love co-investing → Sometimes true. Often hedge. Check their history.
5) We’re backing the team → Until they replace you.
6) I’ll dedicate time → They’re on 7 boards. Good luck.
7) Can my associate join board meetings? → Smart kid ≠ the partner you thought you got.
8) Vanilla term sheet → “Standard” usually means “founder-unfriendly.”
9) We can open doors → Intros ≠ revenue.
10) We like early stage → Check the portfolio. If they haven’t touched seed in years, you’re not getting a check.
Every B2B SaaS looks the same right now.
Same features. Same pricing. Same AI-written content.
If your product, pricing, and marketing are indistinguishable from 10 competitors…
what’s actually going to make you win?
Serious question for founders: what’s your moat in the age of SaaS commoditization?
#SaaS #Buildinpublic #b2b
Can You Build a Startup While Working a Full-Time Job?
YES.
Here’s the no-fluff version:
- Solve a problem you actually feel. No need to “validate” what’s obvious.
- 6–8am is gold. That’s when the work gets done.
- Cut scope ‘til it fits in a weekend. Then cut again.
- Ship ugly. Feedback > polish.
- One user. One metric. One scary next step.
- Skip the pitch deck. Ship product.
You don’t need 40 free hours a week.
You need 10 focused ones and ... a problem that keeps you up anyway.
Momentum beats motivation. Every time.
Most founders don’t actually want to run a $50M company. They just think they’re supposed to.
In reality, many are 0→1 builders.
They love solving problems, shipping features, hearing from customers. They’re happiest with a 3–10 person team and $1–3M ARR.
But they force themselves into the “scale CEO” role, managing 50+ people, sitting in planning meetings, delegating all the work they enjoy.
Result? Misery and burnout.
The happiest founders I know build small SaaS, exit, then do it again. Some are on their 2nd or 3rd.
There’s no shame in being that person.
In fact, it might be the smarter play.
Crypto was supposed to cut out middlemen.
Now middlemen are building the rails.
Visa settles in USDC.
PayPal prints its own dollar.
BlackRock tokenizes funds.
The vision was open networks.
What we’re getting are corporate chains.
This isn’t about banks vs crypto.
It’s about who owns the rails.
Because whoever owns the rails owns the future of money.
And right now, it doesn’t look like us.
#crypto #decentralisation #Bitcoin
Can You Build a Startup While Working a Full-Time Job?
YES.
Here’s the no-fluff version:
- Solve a problem you actually feel. No need to “validate” what’s obvious.
- 6–8am is gold. That’s when the work gets done.
- Cut scope ‘til it fits in a weekend. Then cut again.
- Ship ugly. Feedback > polish.
- One user. One metric. One scary next step.
- Skip the pitch deck. Ship product.
You don’t need 40 free hours a week.
You need 10 focused ones and ... a problem that keeps you up anyway.
Momentum beats motivation. Every time.
The most twisted #SaaS model?
It doesn’t profit when you succeed. It profits when you fail.
Most founders think SaaS means building productivity tools: pay monthly, cancel anytime. That’s the kindergarten version.
The advanced play is enforcement SaaS:
software built to monetize mistakes.
Fullerton, CA is the case study.
Before outsourcing parking enforcement: $33K/month in fines.
After a SaaS vendor took over: $101K/month. A +206% jump.
Not efficiency. Not better service. Just software turning human error into recurring revenue.
Why it works:
Long-term contracts with governments.
Negative churn: citizens can’t cancel tickets.
Extreme lock-in: once deployed, it never gets replaced.
That’s why Conduent makes $600M+ annually.
That’s why T2 Systems sold for $735M.
The lesson for founders:
The strongest SaaS moats aren’t built on what people want to buy.
They’re built where people have no choice.
The most dangerous #SaaS model isn’t built on usage.
It’s built on failure.
Most SaaS founders dream of happy users. Sign-ups, retention, NPS.
But there’s a darker side of SaaS: enforcement software.
It doesn’t profit when you succeed.
It profits when you screw up.
Take parking enforcement.
Fullerton, California outsourced its ticketing to a SaaS vendor.
Before software: $33K in monthly fines.
After software: $101K.
That’s a 206% jump not from demand, but from mistakes.
This model flips the playbook:
- Revenue without demand. No one wants a ticket, yet everyone pays.
- Negative churn. Users can’t cancel their own errors. Volume grows with population, not satisfaction.
- Permanent lock-in. Once embedded in city systems, governments rarely switch.
Enforcement SaaS is capitalism’s strangest trick: turning human error into recurring revenue.
And it might be the stickiest model of them all.
Forget building another CRM, HRMS, or AI wrapper.
The real SaaS goldmines? Porta-potties. Funeral homes. Scrap yards.
Vertical SaaS niches that look insane on the surface but print cash once you see the numbers.
WordPress won’t die. Although...
AI is about to nuke its two core markets:
- SMBs will get instant AI sites bundled with hosting for <$20
- Writers moved to @substack / @Ghost where distribution is built-in
That means the “generic CMS for everyone” model is collapsing.
The real deal isn’t in cloning #WordPress. It’s in building:
1) Vertical stacks → niche workflows with built-in monetization (think Beehiiv for growth, Circle for community).
2) AI-native infra → site builders with no plugins, no patching, no duct tape.
3) Distribution-first platforms → creators care about reach, not CMS features.
Lesson for devs: The web is shifting from one giant CMS to hundreds of purpose-built ones.
That’s where to build.
Pattern:
The biggest #SaaS wins hide in markets where the workflow is mandatory, the buyer has no alternatives, and churn doesn’t exist.
Stop chasing sexy categories. The fortune is in the boring.
Forget building another CRM, HRMS, or AI wrapper.
The real SaaS goldmines? Porta-potties. Funeral homes. Scrap yards.
Vertical SaaS niches that look insane on the surface but print cash once you see the numbers.