@jvb_xyz @Sovereign_Web3 @punk6529@RaoulGMI@blockworks@RealVision “Sure, $1B things occasionally go to $10T.
No, the chart never goes diagonally upwards in a straight line.”
What in the chatgpt slop
@DanielR04416154@Mithra_Is_Fine@Suhail 6 simultaneous companies every 2 months was your original assumption that you indicated wouldn’t be enough lol
6x an engineers salary every year is plenty of incentive
@DanielR04416154@Mithra_Is_Fine@Suhail If he has 6-10 companies going at any given time he’s clearing 7 figs a year. Vast majority of his peers aren’t doing that by working
I’m not defending the man I’m jus pointing out why he’s doing it and it’s not to “steal ideas” from startup companies
@tayvano_@EthosVentures@BooneW@THORChain FWIW I think your actual gripe with thorchain is their celebrating when volume upticks during illicit flows (usually before they knew it was illicit tbf)
This is a legitimate gripe. Maybe just criticize them for the celebrating and drop your other arguments that make no sense
@tayvano_@EthosVentures@BooneW@THORChain The fact that you are going after thorchain for its unsuccessful illicit use case (again, since its traceable)
and not going after Uniswap (or Ethereum validators) for their role in an actual successful illicit use case shows you’re arguing in bad faith
@biancoresearch@AdoptBTC @CrossAssetChart A bad assumption is that OGs would be shuffling Bitcoin off chain into ETFs triggering massive CG events with no benefit
Occams razor
@biancoresearch @CrossAssetChart If the assumption is that the inflows are new buyers- that’s “adoption” no?
The non sequitur is-
Old holders offsetting the inflows by cashing out -> “no adoption”