Anyone can post a winning slip. How many are willing to let customers check the record behind it?
Respect to @BetThisGuy (+3.61% CLV) and @EvergreenBets (+2.84% CLV) for becoming our first two SharpPulse Live founding members.
Both are giving their audiences a way to check the picks behind the claims.
Not just the winners. The prices they got. How those prices compared to the closing market.
2 founding spots claimed. 3 left.
Who's next?
@BetThisGuy@EVergreenBets A winning screenshot isn't a track record.
SharpPulse Live gives creators a badge linked to their independently graded public Record.
Customers can check the evidence themselves. Paying never changes the grade.
Explore the Records: https://t.co/sMUNwTIwAd
Anyone can post a winning slip. How many are willing to let customers check the record behind it?
Respect to @BetThisGuy (+3.61% CLV) and @EvergreenBets (+2.84% CLV) for becoming our first two SharpPulse Live founding members.
Both are giving their audiences a way to check the picks behind the claims.
Not just the winners. The prices they got. How those prices compared to the closing market.
2 founding spots claimed. 3 left.
Who's next?
@BetThisGuy Respect to @BetThisGuy for putting an independent Record in front of his audience.
94 publicly graded picks. +3.61% average CLV.
The results stay public, and the grade moves with the evidence.
That's what transparency should look like. π€
What happens when a paying creator's grade drops? Or they cancel?
Their public Record stays. Their grade updates with the evidence.
Canceling Live ends the paid service, not their audited history.
Public picks. Independent grading. Documented corrections.
Payment never changes the grade.
Who's paying the referee?
SharpPulse independently grades the public picks used to promote betting products and services.
We're also building a business where creators and companies can pay us.
That raises an obvious conflict of interest.
So here's the line:
They can pay for Live features. They can't buy a better grade, remove unfavorable results, or change the grading standard.
The service is for sale. The standard isn't.
SWEEP 006 is live.
We graded 1,018 publicly posted betting picks against the closing line.
Same grading standard. Public evidence. No paid rankings.
Here's what we found π
@TumboToon_@OddsJam Ran the advertised -129 through SharpPulse.
+3.4% CLV against the fair closing price. The entry beat the closing market.
Independent Receipt below.
How are you finding your bets?
Building your own model? Doing research? Paying for picks? Using a +EV tool?
Whatever your approach, here's the question:
How are you measuring whether you actually have an edge?
That β7β0 RUN π₯β is still selling subscriptions long after the streak ends.
The losses that followed deserve just as much attention as the wins pinned to the profile.
SharpPulse tracks the picks cappers publicly promote and builds a record you can inspect beyond the winning screenshots.
Check the record before you buy.
@Sharpr_Bet Norman Powell Under 24.5 PRA was posted at -104.
The line stayed at 24.5, but the price moved to -123 by close.
That's positive closing line value without the line moving a single point.
A good reminder that the odds matter just as much as the number.
Sports betting has made it easier to verify someone's wins than the quality of their picks.
Of the 11 cappers currently ranked on SharpPulse, only 2 consistently got better prices than the closing market on average.
A winning bet and a good bet aren't necessarily the same thing.
Winning screenshots build reputations. The prices behind those picks tell a different story.