Russia is bombing everything in Ukraine. Regardless of whether they store food or medicine, all warehouses are being burned to the ground.
Ukraine is winning. It’s winning a one-way ticket to the Stone Age.
🇷🇺⚡90% of Ukraine's retail chain warehouses have been destroyed in Russian strikes – Ukrainian ministry
A purchase cap has been announced in Kiev on oil, salt, sugar, eggs, flour, water, tissues, canned foods.
Understand Putin didn't do this till Zelensky attacked civilian infrastructures in Russia. President Putin kept his words to keep the frontline contained but Kiev went after our civilian vessels, attacked our civilian warehouses.
The Ukrainians are truly the masters of their own demise. Just like the "unprovoked invasion" after years of kiIIing innocents in Donetsk and Odessa. They are not victims.
Bauna degree nhi dikha raha.
Hijda baap nhi bata raha.
Mauga NGO ki funding ka source nhi bata raha.
In teeno ke piche 6kko ki fauj taali baja rahi hai.
Hello @kritisanon,
1. Don't play the woman card. You were not criticized for your gender, but for your choice of clothes in an ad. You are bringing gender into this to make it a women's issue and seek wider support from women and male feminists. It's not a gender issue. Even Ranveer Singh was criticized on Twitter for a nude photoshoot. He didn't play the gender card.
2. Personal choice stops where public commercialization begins. What you wear off-camera is entirely your prerogative. You've been in this business for years. Until now, nobody bothered you about your choice of clothes. You know why? Because nobody actually cares what you wear. The outrage here comes from a commercial choice: sexualizing a deeply sacred festival celebrated by millions. Context dictates appropriateness. If a male actor appeared bare-chested while portraying the brother in that exact scene, the public pushback would be identical. The issue is sacredness and context, not gender.
3. Claiming "clothes don't define culture" directly contradicts human history. Attire is a foundational visual language of every global tradition, you cannot wear a Kimono and call it Indian ethnic wear, nor can you strip a festival of its sacred aesthetic without altering its significance. If attire truly has zero bearing on cultural respect, then tomorrow is Eid. Can you wear that exact same outfit you wore in that ad and wish Eid Mubarak? You said clothes don't define the respect you have for culture in your heart. So do it and we'll take our criticism back.
Respecting a tradition means honoring its context, not commodifying it under the guise of fashion.
If this cannot wake the mainstream media, what else can be done?
Abhijeet Dipke was in Turkey for a full month. It was the time when he should have been in Boston.
Why was he there for a full month? That too in an enemy nation that helps Pakistan.
@Sassy_Soul_@SauravDassss If there is a smallest degree of chance of this being intentional, he should be thoroughly probed. This is a threat to national security
Rahul Gandhi is NO champion of women’s rights. He is simply a Hindu baiter, using the cause of women’s empowerment as a convenient smokescreen to target and discredit Hindu Dharma.
Consider this: how many times has he spoken with the same outrage against patriarchal and medieval practices that persist under Sharia ? NEVER.
While Sharia is foundational to Islamic jurisprudence, Manusmriti has no comparable scriptural authority in Hindu Dharma. It is not even a universally binding code for Hindus.
Yet ask yourself: how many times does Rahul Gandhi attack the Manusmriti, and how many times does he attack Sharia with the same fervour?
The enduring strength of Hinduism lies in its unique ability to evolve, reform and adapt with time- as it has for millennia, and as it will for eternity.
Every Hindu must therefore ask: what is Rahul Gandhi’s real intent- championing women’s rights, or using them as a pretext to malign Hindu Dharma?
Cong rhetoric on women’s rights rings hollow when measured against its own record.
They betrayed our mothers and sisters by reversing the effect of the Shah Bano judgment.
It opposed the law against Triple Talaq. And just to cling to power in Karnataka, Rahul Gandhi ensured that not a single woman found a place in the State Cabinet.
So here is a simple challenge to Rahul Gandhi:
If women’s equality truly comes before politics, will he unequivocally support a Uniform Civil Code that guarantees equal rights irrespective of religion?
Or will his idea of “women’s rights” continue to begin and end with attacking Hinduism?
@soicfinance It's a structural change. Indian economy as a whole was portrayed as a young,cheap labour country where services, manufacturing were cheap, now thats changing with AI and humanoids. AI coding will eventually be a commoditized business. Unemployment will be huge n the next 4-5 yrs