I don't care who you are, what you are, but anyone not protesting against the taliban regime for suppressing and oppressing women are all allowing crimes to happen in front of their own eyes. Islamic scholars around the world need to spam fatwa en masses else you are all the same
@agrawalmanindra@sidhant_sarthak Who made you the director of IIT? Do you have any basic knowledge about anything? Yapping endlessly with no merits backed at all. Entire world is laughing at fools like you. Keep up the great work. Ban everything and go back to caves.
@Awas8702Awasthi@timesofindia No matter what the other side of the story is, abuse is abuse and there is no justification to that especially when everything is recorded on camera.
@drviral1123@Whatsin86689792@narendramodi@netanyahu India has nothing tog in or lose. We don't care about what happens in middle east either. Mainly because we don't really understand what the problem really is or what solutions we can even provide. We just don't want to join the losing side of any war. As simple as that.
@drviral1123@Whatsin86689792@narendramodi@netanyahu India has always taken Israel's side without being open about it. They have always expressed their opinions in a diplomatic way to avoid taking any indirect recoil damage in the process.
@narendramodi Why are you hellbent on policing free speech so much? Deep fakes, porn, nudity, hate speech, propaganda are all part of free speech, right to expression, art and literature. Japan has legalized all these cause all of these are just fantasies, if done with consent.
@nvrsynvr12@BhogleAnita@timesofindia Never heard of this kind of illiteracy before. Nobody owns anybody when they become adults, when they are earning their own salaries.
@Aemon_K @_rawnreal What does a crime in India have to do with banning face coverings?
This is a deflection. One is a violent act. The other is systemic control disguised as tradition.
If you care about women, fight both. Not just the ones that fit your argument.
@Aemon_K @_rawnreal This was never about winning. It was about exposing how "protection" is often just control in disguise.
And no, women aren't all free yet. Not while shame is still taught as virtue and freedom is mistaken for indecency.
Keep your sarcasm. I'll keep the argument.
@Aemon_K @_rawnreal Calling me lustful just because I defend a woman's right to be seen says a lot about you, not me.
Covering women doesn't protect them. It polices them.
And yes, I use tools to write better. You use faith to think less.
@aballofwei67254 @_rawnreal If you can't be arsed to answer, then don't preach. If your faith is so fragile it can't handle debate, then it's not faith. It's fear.
You see ignorance. I see convenient silence. I asked to understand. You replied with an exit. That says everything.
@ErrolTostigson So when did the Indian ocean, the British East India Company, the Indian subcontinent get their names originated from and where did the India name even come from if your theory is True?
@aballofwei67254 @_rawnreal Workplace dress codes aren’t based on calling women’s bodies sinful or distracting. That’s not equality, that’s theology disguised as policy.
And if your only answer is “go ask an imam,” you’ve already run out of argument. Faith shouldn’t fear questions.
@Aemon_K @_rawnreal So now I'm a pervert for supporting a woman's right to be seen? Your logic is backwards.
Covering women to control men's lust isn't protection. It's punishing her for his lack of discipline.
And attacking my style just means you're out of arguments. Stay on topic or stay quiet.
@aballofwei67254 @_rawnreal Islam's dress code isn't equal. Women are supposed to cover everything but hands/face, men cover waist to knee. That's not equality, that's control disguised as modesty.
The logic is simple: if the body isn't sinful, why must she hide it?