A Challenge to Those Who Call Us “Madākhilah”
I challenge every one of you who uses this term to attack us: billāhi ʿalayk, bring forth the uṣūl in which we have supposedly deviated. Show us the uṣūl established by the Salaf, then demonstrate—through clear evidence—how we have opposed them.
We do not want lengthy paragraphs or lists numbered from one to ninety-nine that contain no actual evidence, as someone did yesterday.
The dīn is established upon evidence. If you truly claim to be from Ahl al-Athar, then bring your proofs.
Whenever we debate you, you flee to channels that circulate the same tired shubuhāt. Stand by your claims and defend them properly. By Allah, your arguments lack seriousness, sound reasoning, and sincerity.
Allah ﷻ says:
“Say, ‘Produce your proof, if you are truthful.’”
We seek nothing except the truth.
Abu Muadh, don’t you have a few more apologies to dash out this year? Or was that the old you?
2 public apologies a year for 8 years, what happened?
You still changing your tone of voice in the masajid trying to act strong?
By Allah you’ve only led the young astray who were fanatic in your sittings.
May Allah deal with you and Arafat.
Conference in Belgium next weekend 17th - 19th July In’sha’Allah.
Hosted at Masjid el-Albānī, Gent, Belgium — schedule below.
I look forward to meeting with all our beloved brothers from Belgium and other neighbouring European countries in’sha’Allah.
@sufinakirah@Milat_at_Tawhid Akhi, Mohamed made the post 24 hours before visiting. Where was this guy? God knows.
Allah is my witness, we were told that they (the Khawarij) were there, but they chickened out.
😂
Part 6: First Brotherly Advice to Faliḥ About Tabdīʿ and Taqlīd
Shaykh Rabīʿ: “The scholars are not followed except when their sayings are based on the texts, when evidences are lacking, it is not binding upon anyone to follow them.”
Read more:
https://t.co/IK0KcTYLqV
Coming from a guy hiding behind a slanderous term, baiting in little wusses and pussy sissies to repost his content pulling at their strings. 😂
Should’ve pulled up to Hyde park.
Come on a live, come do a face reveal.
And tell us for Allahs sake, what is the Usūl of the Madakhila?
This guy's prepubescent voice was comically indicative of his puniness.
They have to manufacture an identity around being loudmouths to make up for it.
@Tarrasbulba123 Cry kiddo, you have no basis to follow your takfiri shaykh, you’re a R tard which didn’t get belted into developing some comprehensive skills.
You and Daniel Haqiqatjou are two sides of the same coin.
Both unqualified charlatans who attack Muslims. One calls to Rafidhi Iran whereas you call to your Sufi Ashari rulers in the UAE.
This is what Daniel Haqiqatjou does with the Ayatollah’s.
@Tarrasbulba123 How many times did we mention not knowing a Haal doesn’t mean there’s blame 😂.
How many times did the Shaykh also Accommodate Shāykh Rabī’? Hmmmm
@ShaykhAMJ_@sh_musa_jibril This is so sad cause it makes Musa Jibril look even worse and more humiliated than before..😭
He clearly didn’t like the humiliation ritual he had to undergo just over a month ago
@Tarrasbulba123 Nice throwing of shade,
We could try and say you’re trying to keep to manhaj, but Wallah wa Billah you’re upon only the path of nafs 😂.
‘Shaykh Huwayni’
Tfou alayk
@Tarrasbulba123 Bring me Salaf who precede you 😂.
And you’re calling Shaykh Abu Iyyad uncle, go ahead.
He was giving this Da’wah with the speech of the Ulama, since when?
You weren’t even born yet and he was still actively giving Da’wah.
@Tarrasbulba123 It’s narrated by them they left him off due to the mere leaving of the Jam’ah in the issue pertaining Khuruj 😂.
I’m not saying it you ahmaq, the Khalaf would say he was left off due to his stance.
I said wallah I won’t discuss Shaykh Uthaymeen unless you agree to the terms.
And you said huwyani had one innovation hence not an innovator.
Even if he had one, as long as he died upon it, and he HAD BEEN ADVISED WITH IT, and told you RETRACT, then he’s an innovator.
Salih ibn Hayy is an example from the Salaf.
The claim of the hanabila was correct, who I put it upon was incorrect 😂.
It’s the stance of the Hanabila to takfir those with Bid’ah Mukafirah.
But Huwaynis Bid’ah wasn’t Mukafirah.
I went and sat with a brother and he discussed it with me.
Unlike you, I can actually retract where I’m mistaken. Whereas you? You go with it as long as you can.
May Allah punish you severely.
A mistake which he was told to recant for?
Is that his only mistake?
Also whatever you bring regarding shaykh Uthaymeen, if I was to concede then it would be as you said lol.
Now back to Huwayni, so him not retracting after being told it’s a mistake, countless times, is not an innovation which makes him an innovator?
Okay, what about Tawhid Al Hakimiyyah, takfir of the Hukaam on the Zaman, Praise of Qaradawi, Dedew, Muhammad Al Hasan, and many more Ikhwanis like Abdullah Kishk.
His praise of them is also just a mistake?
Okay what about his attack against those who speak out against them? 😂
What about the takfir over the matter of Hijab?
Or his innovation in Qadr and Qadha, that Allah only knows of bad things and doesn’t actually decree them. Hmm
What a cope.
I asked Shkh Bilal
If the Muslim ruler declares someone to be from the Khawarij, is it a valid Sharʿi excuse to continue supporting him simply because he has not yet been officially dismissed? Is saying,I will support him until he is officially dismissed a valid Sharʿī excuse?