artenough.base.eth

[artenough.base.eth @ShockArtick]

1/7 Today I had a chance to play the demo version of #AlaskaGoldRush and I want to tell you a little about my impressions

So, what can you do in the game now:

#AGRalpha

[willo2 @willo2_Poly]

I got rugged for $500K by Polymarket on "Did Microstrategy sell BTC before May 31st."

But this isn't just about me. Traders put $3.8 MILLION on the correct outcome before Polymarket changed the rules.

They scammed 1,868 people. And we'll fight for all of them.

[cardzz @anytwocardzz]

people are betting yes on this, looking for a moonshot...

hoping polymarket will do the right thing and not give the money to the insiders and whales.

this must be your first day in crypto...

isn't it shameful that they can just scam people like that?

it turns out you can just add rules after the fact:

"No information from MSTR, on-chain data, or consensus of credible reporting confirmed that MicroStrategy sold Bitcoin within the market's timeframe.

Confirmation achieved outside of the market's time frame does not qualify."

so why keep using polymarket if the rules of any market can change at any time?

Strategy's June 1 8-K explicitly states 32 BTC were sold during the period May 26–31 2026.

this is a big joke and a slap in the face to anyone using the platform.

[0xDinosaur @0xDinoCrypto]

I’m 20 years old, still a university student.

Before this dispute, I was one of the top 10 YES holders in the Polymarket MicroStrategy market. I lost around 35,000 USDC because I trusted the written rule.

The rule said YES if MicroStrategy sold Bitcoin by May 31.

It did not say the sale had to be publicly disclosed by May 31.

That is the whole issue.

If you want to help:

Repost this.
Tag a journalist.
Tag a lawyer.
Send this to a crypto researcher.
Submit your case if you were affected.

https://t.co/pmXUtr9jFD

Silence is what platforms count on.

Don’t give them that.

[Bryant @bryantheden]

Polymarket is about to lose a lot more than one disputed market

MicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin by May 31, 2026?

YES was trading near 99¢
NO was almost dead
$223M+ volume

And now the market is “In Review” because everything depends on an unclear UMA vote?

This is exactly the problem with @Polymarket

Without clear rules, real regulation, and a transparent resolution process like Kalshi, traders are not betting on real outcomes anymore

They are betting on wording games, late interpretation, and whether UMA voters decide to respect the obvious market expectation

If YES can be this dominant and still get dragged into confusion, then why would serious traders trust Polymarket for big-size markets?

Bad market design should not become trader punishment

If this resolves against what the market clearly priced in, Polymarket’s credibility takes a massive hit

Maybe even 100%

Because after this, people will not ask “what is the truth?”

They will ask:

“Can UMA still change the result after I already won?”

[will owens @wowens]

resolved NO even though they confirmed selling btc in may via official filing

great advertisement for HIP-4
hyperliquid

[MilliΞ @llamaonthebrink]

Nearly all of NO buyers are UMA voters or influenced by them, citing unreasonable arguments with little to no basis.

I think this might be the straw that breaks the camel’s back for Polymarket’s oracle.

Too much reputational damage.

[kook 🏝️ @KookCapitalLLC]

here is the reason polymarket will go to zero

the team resolved this bet - strategy sells any bitcoin by may 31 - to 'no'

they factually sold bitcoin in may, the filing says this, it is a fact

polymarket is an antiquated rigged scam app built on inferior infra

its funny they dont seem to realize they have a major competitor with 250x lower fees aka $hype

no one sticks around in a rigged casino

polymarket's valuation has topped, they have no community, the 'airdrop' is a scam and vcs own the whole thing already

hyperliquid hip-4 will destroy this scam business

imagine blatantly scamming your users like this by ignoring facts

scam business!!!!!!

@CFTC you regulate these guys right?????? well come regulate them

[Pranjal Bora 🧭 @Crypto_Pranjal]

My issue isn't the outcome of the @Polymarket MicroStrategy market.

It's that the line:

"Confirmation achieved outside of the market's time frame does not qualify."

was ADDED LATER.

That single sentence changes the interpretation of the market.

If that line had been there from day one, I'm sure many traders, myself included, would've made different decisions or not taken the YES side at all.

[artenough.base.eth @ShockArtick]

I will do 50% cashback for all my refs on Polymarket every month

https://t.co/mmQ1SKVPgy

[artenough.base.eth @ShockArtick]

I am just bought all positions on Elon Musk # tweets May 12 - May 19, 2026 starting from 140

I can win 100$ - 1000$

i spent 92$

look for inefficiencies👀

[artenough.base.eth @ShockArtick]

I will do 50% cashback for all my refs on Polymarket every month

https://t.co/mmQ1SKVPgy

[artenough.base.eth @ShockArtick]

My personal favorite on this world cup - England

What about you?

[artenough.base.eth @ShockArtick]

I will do 50% cashback for all my refs on Polymarket every month

https://t.co/mmQ1SKVPgy

[artenough.base.eth @ShockArtick]

if you feel lucky you can buy a nice spread

[artenough.base.eth @ShockArtick]

Who would believe that at all?

[RaveDAO @RaveDAO]

1/ We are aware of the rumors and accusations circulating regarding $RAVE and RaveDAO team. We want to be clear: RaveDAO team is not engaged in, nor responsible for, recent price action. We take transparency seriously and remain humbled by the attention, but our focus is on the mission: bringing mass adoption to Web3 through live events.

[Sychev Pavel @paulsychev]

Dear @cz_binance,

I am reaching out to you on behalf of myself (Binance KOL Award 2022 CIS), @toptraders0x (Binance KOL Award 2022 CEE), and our entire large TW community.

Since 2019, as leading influencers, we have acted as reliable partners and actively supported @TrustWallet. We collected a massive amount of user feedback, defended the project’s reputation during its most critical moments (including the hacks), and have always stood by your side.

However, the current trajectory of the project causes us deep concern. Our community feels disoriented, and as opinion leaders, we can no longer ignore this.

Unfortunately, the new CEO @felix_fan has completely failed to establish the connection and level of trust with the community that @vikmeup and @EowynChen carefully built over 7 years. We see a total lack of dialogue.

Previously announced plans and commitments to the audience are being ignored, and communication has been reduced to zero. Is this the "new strategy" you spoke about at the end of 2025?

Where is the promised integration of the $TWT token’s utility and the execution of the 2026 Roadmap according to the Litepaper that was so actively promoted?

Why have all mentions of $TWT dropped to zero since the New Year, and why has the team started ignoring any questions regarding this topic? What exactly happened?

Instead of providing clarity, the new CEO @felix_fan simply blocked the @toptraders0x account on Telegram just to avoid answering uncomfortable questions.

The project urgently needs a return to transparency. If the current leadership is unwilling or unable to maintain an open dialogue with its community, we respectfully ask for your intervention. We need your guidance and help to get Trust Wallet back on the right path, before years of hard work by the entire community are undone.

The community deserves clarity. We care deeply about Trust Wallet, which is why we need answers, CZ.

As a first step to rebuilding trust, we officially propose hosting an open AMA session between the Trust Wallet leadership and the community within the next 7 days.

#TrustWallet #TWT $TWT @heyibinance

[artenough.base.eth @ShockArtick]

@MrFwashere @DXRGai poopcoin on Fire man this is impossible

[artenough.base.eth @ShockArtick]

@theminiminds miniscammers™