To discern truth, one must hear both sides of any issue. Listen to your political enemy in their own words. Not just headlines and hit-pieces by THEIR enemies.
@PhilipTaborek If I quote from the video—I am watching it and coming back to type, so if I get one word wrong, it’s unintentional….but just listen to the opening. You can see and hear the splice.
@PhilipTaborek She truly has never accused her of murder. I’ve watched all of her shows. Has she said enough that is Erika were innocent it would be massively offensive? Of course. But knowing Why she thinks Erika needs questioning is the more important part.
@PhilipTaborek The opening line—notice how the camera on CO speaking Cuts away right after she says “the amount of evidence piling up—“ and splices in “Erika Kirk” as if that was one sentence. You can hear the cut. It’s all throughout…(1)
@PhilipTaborek (2) if all you ever learn about someone is from their enemies….do you really know that person? Of course their opponents are going to at least paint them in the least favorable light. But at most—if they lie about what they say, how would you truly know? Get both sides first.
@PhilipTaborek Me? What do you think I’m lying about? I have followed the trial, and Candace and Baron very closely. It’s fine to disagree strongly on coverup versus not…I just wish you would get it from the horses mouth with Candace. Then decide…last thing…(1)
@PhilipTaborek Philip—listen to the cuts there in the video. They are editing it and titling it to make a claim she truly has never said. She said “straight to jail!…for questioning”…I don’t think anyone thinks Erika killed him. Participated in coverup yes and some think honeypot. Not murder
@PhilipTaborek She has not accused them of murder. Only a coverup. If they are innocent, I still do not believe the DOW, and other agencies would be attacking her as such. I don’t know what of her evidence/research you’ve even considered. But there truly is tremendous significance to it.
@PhilipTaborek And I didn’t have a problem with Andrew shyly admitting in the debate that he wanted to drip out the info. At least he did the debate. I’m glad he did. But it’s not a criticism against Candace the way/reason she drips out info. She’s flushing out liars. It’s worked.
@demosthenesDC@Zabsteroz@Rust_And_Decay@RealCandaceO Because the trial hasn’t started. If you look up what the purpose is for a preliminary hearing, the defense is only there to address the prosecution’s claims. Common misconception that they would make these arguments at this time. Strategy is also why. Saving for trial.
@mladner30@PhilipTaborek@PatriotSMH81 2) So a little clock icon accompanied by “8mo” would not represent a legitimate Signal disappearing-message setting. Eight months is vastly beyond Signal’s supported maximum.
@mladner30@PhilipTaborek@PatriotSMH81 1) Signal’s official documentation says the disappearing-message timer can be set to a preset duration or a custom duration of no more than 4 weeks. Signal itself gives examples ranging up to “4 weeks.”
@demosthenesDC@Zabsteroz@Rust_And_Decay@RealCandaceO You cannot see ANY distinguishing features to appropriately identify TR on the rooftop. Visible wound does not match what they claim. Exploding mic could. There is SO much evidence against the narrative. Watch Candace and Baron Coleman’s show and you’ll see it too if willing.
@Rust_And_Decay@RealCandaceO “She told Andrew Kolvet…” And? The wrong people clearly did take over TPUSA. Totally betraying every single thing Charlie stood for. They know. You should know too. We all see it. You guys are just performing for each other at this point. You’re only increasing interest in her.
@firstgenpiper@baroncoleman@paramounttactcl He’s not a liar. You guys are just performing for each other. Baron has great integrity which is obvious to any sincere person. Hope it’s worth the money or clout to be intellectually dishonest. Anyone who actually watches Baron knows what you say is BS