🚨 NEW: #ManCity📷’s appeal will rely on bank statements, money transfers and witness evidence which the club says shows sponsorship funding came from the Abu Dhabi GOVERNMENT — not Sheikh Mansour or ADUG.
City believe this evidence undermines the central allegation that owner funds were secretly channelled through sponsors.
https://t.co/U01WmALCbu
[@MikeKeegan_DM]
@RD_9320@AshleyMcduff115 Yes. Ray Parlour's 2004 divorce disclosures revealed Arsenal used dual contracts: basic wages taxed at normal rates, plus bonuses routed via offshore trusts and front companies for far lower tax. HMRC later pursued the schemes and Arsenal paid around £11m in back tax.
🚨 Amazon has been recording Manchester United’s 2026/27 season for an “All or Nothing” series.
So far:
❌ Lost opening match to newly promoted Hull
❌ Conceded last-minute equaliser to Everton
❌ Lost to 10-man Manchester City
❌ 15-year-old JJ Gabriel requested to leave the club
❌ Lost to Brighton after leading by 2 goals
❌ Lost to Atlético Madrid in the Champions League
❌ Lisandro Martínez publicly criticised the club’s ambitions & hierarchy
❌ Conceded after 2 minutes vs Como
❌ 0 wins in their last 6 matches
The cameras are capturing pure chaos. Series airs summer 2027. 🍿
Or will it ?
#AllOrNothing
Why do the Premier League keep changing their rules, in close relation to Man City's activity?
Sheikh Mansour buys Man City in 2008, the Premier League starts the process to introduce FFP in 2012.
Man City win the UEFA CAS case in 2020, the Premier league creates APT in 2021, and attempts to block Man City's revenue streams anyway.
Man City demonstrate they are prepared to appeal, the Premier League introduces new appeal rules that reduce the window of time Man City have to make arguments?
Note: They still did this knowing, it's an extremely complex case, an historical set of total charges, which in turn requires the most accurate legal applications possible?
I do not understand why, this type of aggressive Premier League ruling governance, is not also being applied in relation to extremely harmful ownership models like Man United's?
Hundreds of millions worth of revenue is still pumped regularly out of Man United and therefore out of the English Football pyramid.
Where the majority instead ends up flowing directly into American banking lenders, through the path-way of massive interest payments.
That type of activity is much more damaging to the health of Man Utd, than Man City's owners have been for their club?
FFP was created to stop clubs from going insolvent, not to stop them from being able to invest?
Man City's underlying financial position is strong enough to withstand the departure of its owner without immediately facing insolvency.
The irony is that the greatest financial threat Man City could face, is instead from the very FFP ruleset that was created to help prevent a clubs insolvency.
🚨 David Kogan: "I'm not a lawyer, and neither are you two! #ManCity's lawyers believe it has grounds for appeal"
"We've not seen a redacted version of the findings.. I won't get pushed into any judgement until these questions are answered. Pre-empting would be colossal mistake"