Mistake acknowledged. ProRef has made contact with Manchester United this evening "to acknowledge what we deem is an error of judgement" over Manchester City's controversial goal. "A review of the incident will take place,” a Pro Ref spokesperson says.
“The on-field decision was offside against Erling Haaland – that was checked by VAR and he was found to be in an onside position. In the same attack, it was established that Enzo Fernandez did not play the ball and therefore that makes any offside offence subjective, however, on this occasion, the VAR did not recognise the likely impact of his position and should have recommended an on-field review."
Some official accountability but little consolation to United or Michael Carrick. Huge mistake.
@nik0_mcr Greenwood’s opposite Victoria station has loads of screens, been there plenty for CL nights, they’ll have all the English games on. Easy enough walk down Victoria St from Westminster
Serious question.
Money aside, what on earth was Semenyo thinking when he signed for City?
He must have known, or at least had an inkling that Pep, Rodri, Silva, Stones et al were leaving.
Not to mention 115.
6 months is all he had to wait to join us and fulfil his dream 🤷♂️
@Cymru Supposed to be a bespoke shirt? What’s the print meant to be? The collar and sleeve look like a standard template.
Massive downgrade from Adidas. Back to 2008 and 1975 Bukta ffs
Why don’t we sign ‘Wonderwall’ at the Etihad!? It’s always baffled me.
When you hear England signing it, it makes it even more baffling! It’s basically a Manchester City song.
@iamjam4s@PolitlcsUK They do, looks like a neighbours ring camera, so keeping the footage related to murder to not prejudice a trial, it’ll come out at or after trial