Sighto

[Sighto @Sightoghost]

Keep seeing people asking for a UK DOGE. We already have one @WokeWaste @CharlotteCGill . We all need to get behind her and get rid of woke rubbish once and for all.

[VoxPopuli @vpopulimedia]

🚨🇬🇧 The Rape Gang Enquiry has been RELEASED.

You can read it here: https://t.co/Ui0AcbUKMK

[Callum Lyon @CallumLyon]

The UK has somehow convinced people that working full time and still being broke is completely normal.

[Pavel Durov @durov]

Banning social media for teenagers only puts them in greater danger.

Teens are forced to switch to VPNs — and unlock far worse illegal content.

We’ve seen this before. When the Russian government banned Telegram, 95% of Russian teenagers kept using it. They just moved to VPNs.

[Sighto @Sightoghost]

@NadineDorries How can anyone vote for reform, it's Tories 2.0.

[Caroline Farrow @CF_Farrow]

10 June: Canada tables an under-16 social media ban + age checks for everyone.

Five days later, Starmer announces the same for Britain.

Same policy. Same timing. Same “safety” language.

Coincidence - or another piece of the global censorship agenda?

[The Architect. @TheMarcitect]

Instead of banning kids from social media how about we ban politicians from our lives instead.

[Mannie Quinn & The Dolly Liberation Army @DollidarityArmy]

Just a couple of reminders of how much Starmer cares about the safety of kids.

[Darren of Plymouth @DarrenPlymouth]

UK Government advise their own staff to use VPNs from home to protect their identities and data.

[James Melville 🚜 @JamesMelville]

It was never about safeguarding the kids. This is a smokescreen for government controlled digital ID via social media access - applicable to all.

[Sighto @Sightoghost]

@BBCBreaking 😂😂😂

[Nat @Arwenstar]

“Adults can still access social media through age checks like facial recognition, digital IDs, passports and credit cards.”

This is what this ban for the under-16s is REALLY about: identifying ALL adults under the guise of ‘protecting’ children.

Anyone with half a brain knows this.

[Samantha Carson 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🇬🇧 @misscarsonn]

Other parents: “Thank God Keir Starmer has banned social media and YouTube for under-16s. Best thing he’s ever done.”

Me, fully awake:
“Don’t worry kids, I’ve got the VPN ready.”

My children belong to me. Not the state.

And that is non-negotiable.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Any attempt to impose mandatory Digital ID will be fully repealed, scrapped and eradicated by a Restore Britain Government.

[Sighto @Sightoghost]

@dingleloos @DrewIsSharing Please watch this. Easier to show than explain. https://t.co/74PZU9gfym

[Sighto @Sightoghost]

@dingleloos @DrewIsSharing Hahaha as if. There literally creating a digital id, everything you say online will be monitored, will build a profile of you and then you have a social credit score like china.

[Sighto @Sightoghost]

@DrewIsSharing Digital id incoming

[Sighto @Sightoghost]

@Keir_Starmer DIGITAL ID INCOMING

[Sighto @Sightoghost]

@SamCKx Got nothing to do about protecting children and all about bringing in digital id.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

A Restore Britain Government will repeal Starmer's social media ban and let parents parent.

[Fiona Rose Diamond @CoviLeaks]

📛THE MIDNIGHT PANOPTICON: Starmer to announce tomorrow total social media ban for under 16s, AI bans for under 18s as he also unveils mandatory nightly digital curfews for teens 17 and under📛

We have weeks - mere months - to smash this digital iron curtain!

The entire nation is being dragged into a state run panopticon because 30-odd thousand moronic, lazy, and pathetic parents refused to raise their own kids. Your cowardice just doomed everyone else's freedom, and you are utterly disgusting!

Wake the hell up and understand what this means!

Starmer's upcoming social media edict is the definitive death rattle of British liberty, a chilling milestone where the state officially nationalises your children and liquidates the concept of parental authority.

Under the guise of a benevolent 'protection' racket, the Labour government will legally bar anyone under sixteen from ten major digital platforms, including TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat, and YouTube.

But the true, mask-off authoritarianism lies in the regimes treatment of sixteen and seventeen year olds, who will be subjected to a mandatory, state enforced nightly social media curfew, locking them out of the digital world from 9pm to 7am.

And the ultimate hypocrisy of the system. Under the Representation of the People Bill, the government claims 16 and 17 year olds are mature enough to vote, pay taxes, and shape the geopolitical future of the United Kingdom, yet simultaneously argues they are too fragile to choose their own bedtime on the internet.

To round out this corporate-state panopticon, the government is completely banning under 18s from specific AI chatbots and stripping apps of basic features like disappearing messages and livestreaming.

The sheer, suffocating dystopia of this policy is found not in what it bans, but in how it must be enforced. To police a nightly digital curfew for near adults, the state cannot rely on an honour system; it requires total, invasive, and inescapable biometric surveillance.

Every single citizen, regardless of age, will soon be forced to scan their face, upload government identification, or surrender biometric data just to access the foundational infrastructure of the modern internet. By weaponising a media-stoked moral panic to convince 'nine out of ten' terrified parents (the 30-odd thousand moronic parents who responded to the consultation) to beg for their own subjugation, the Starmer regime has executed the Hegelian script flawlessly.

They allowed algorithmic poison to fester, waited for the public to scream for a saviour, and are now delivering the ultimate trap: a permanent digital passport system where the state controls your face, your identity, and your right to communicate after dark.