@W1111William@mmpadellan ICE has used more lethal force under this administration than any before it, and that's exactly why public trust in it has collapsed. Patriots, people who actually believe in their country, hold government employees accountable. They don't make excuses for incompetence.
@starside8@mmpadellan ICE has used more lethal force under this administration than any before it, and that's exactly why public trust in it has collapsed. Patriots, people who actually believe in their country, hold government employees accountable. They don't make excuses for incompetence.
@Iron_Dumpling @dplancephd @mmpadellan Breaking the law doesn't justify excessive force — that's not law enforcement, that's vigilantism. ICE has used more lethal force under this administration than under any before it, and that's exactly why public trust in it has collapsed.
@dplancephd @mmpadellan Accountability for law enforcement isn't about defending criminals. It's about defending the integrity of law enforcement and society itself.
@Kencook050190 @mmpadellan You have no idea if this is man's criminal. You can only see that he's being detained or arrested. Absolutely they do not have the right to use excessive force. That is breaking the law. ICE since the formation in 2003 has never had this amount of incidents.
@mmpadellan I'm not sure how they made it into law enforcement. Clearly they neither have the temperament or the skill to be in these roles. They're committing crimes when they should be enforcing the law.
@_liam_george_@beyoncegarden 1940's 'low crime' stats aren't a golden age — they're a paper trail cops never bothered to write. Police ignored white violence against Black victims and barely investigated Black-on-Black murders. Missing data isn't good data.
@beyoncegarden 1940's 'low crime' stats aren't a golden age — they're a paper trail cops never bothered to write. Police ignored white violence against Black victims and barely investigated Black-on-Black murders. Missing data isn't good data.
@Isabella_im38 To support it they'd need data, historical examples, a mechanism explaining why it happens, and comparisons to other systems.
You can take almost any ideology and build an argument that sounds convincing if you simply make unsupported statements.
@RapidResponse47 Plot twist: the people driving up housing demand were also the ones building the supply that kept prices in check. The White House cited a paper that proves their own argument wrong. Read people.
@_jeffskelly@RapidResponse47 Did anybody actually read this report? The supply side was actively controlling prices, and the tweet ignored it entirely. The same people accused of driving up housing prices were the ones building the houses that kept prices down. Read people 🤣
@breyeanj@mmpadellan It's remarkable, really. That man is rarely correct about anything. The more passionately he argues a point, the less it appears grounded in facts, logic, or even a basic understanding of the issue at hand. You statement is optimistic, it would require a lot of willful ignorance
@kirawontmiss Inflation already automatically raises server pay because tips are percentage-based. A burger doubles in price? Their tip already doubled too.
So going from 10–12% in the ‘70s to “20–25% minimum” today is basically demanding double pay for the same job as before.