Nemotron 3 Ultra performed GPT 5.5 level 10× cheaper
We gave three same prompts to build HTML5 canvas with real physics. At first scene we have water in a spinning drum. Galton board - balls through pegs into bins. And a block collision setup with extreme mass differences.
Outputs:
Nemotron 3 Ultra: 11.3k tokens, $0.051
GPT 5.5: 11.0k tokens, $0.57
Nemotron stays right on GPT 5.5's heels, but at 10× cheaper. The gap in quality is far smaller than the gap in price.
New Google Gemma 4 12B claims near-26B performance - we tested both!
We ran both models locally on one RTX 4090 and gave each the same task: write a self-contained HTML5 canvas animation with real physics in one file without libraries. Three scenes - a Galton board, two blocks colliding off a wall, and a chaotic triple pendulum
Outputs:
Gemma 4 26B-A4B: 15 GB VRAM usage, 6.9k tokens, 138 tok/s
Gemma 4 12B: 9 GB VRAM usage, 8.9k tokens, 80 tok/s
Same Gemma 4 family, but the 26B-A4B won every scene and ran ~1.7x faster - on just 4B active params. The 12B stayed very close though, on almost half the VRAM - which makes it the ideal model for a 16 GB laptop
@onchaindudes This issue was real in the early versions, but the Nous Research team is actively working on improving the agent - and we ship the latest version of the agent in our browser ;)
@Hong60282445 Yes! Remote model support is on the roadmap and coming soon. You'll be able to point your agent at a remote endpoint and run OpenClaw smoothly even on lighter laptops
Private AI browser with the OpenClaw agent on free local models
Run your agent on Qwen, Gemma, or Nemotron directly in the browser
Open source. Private. Runs on your local device