27, Minors DNI, Professional Wrestler, Former brony, current furry, He/Him, Memento Mori π€π€, bisexual, bigots fuck off, yes I'd like to see your dogs
@KeemTheTruth Honestly this was the safest way to do the loaded headbutt finish unfortunately. Making connection could risk concussion for American/Gable and a rib injury for AJ. And doing a clean finish wasn't an option because the story of Gable's character necessitates sketchy shit.
@PupKynaois@FuroFur And again, we have to acknowledge the negative impact of UNREPENTANT zoophiles on the furry community, and the major social and even economic consequences for organizers as well as individuals.
@PupKynaois@FuroFur Keep in mind you're on Twitter/X, which isn't the *best* site for deep insight. Now, another thing is to define "self acceptance" in this context. Because "yeah I wanna fuck a dog" vs. "I acknowledge the problem, and am working to unpack it" is a BIG difference.
@PupKynaois@FuroFur If you're unpacking the problematic nature of that attraction through them, and they are helping you to not offend, then I fully support THAT. However, the issue arises when you attempt to encourage other zoophiles to proudly display that, without an included message to seek help
@PupKynaois@FuroFur Depends on the individual, to be fair. I'm speaking more broadly. However, the actual attraction is problematic and the primary reason is the lack of ability to consent, and an attraction towards that. CBT is an effective treatment, and that is therapy. If you refuse to seek that
@transfemfurry @PupKynaois@FuroFur Worst part is, there's a nugget of validity buried: these attractions are usually the result of repressed trauma that needs unpacked. If a zoo/pedo/etc. doesn't act and actually seeks help, then we should normalize that. Pride in zoo/pedophilia, however...should be exterminated.
@royal34074@FuroFur Unfortunately the zoo is right (broken clocks). If they do not actually act on those attractions, or possess media of said attractions being acted on, then they are likely not breaking any laws. With that said, social consequences ARE a resource available to us
@Docca27@FuroFur ...the fandom already has an unfair reputation developed for "sexual deviancy" and allowing zoophiles to freely interact without pushback would give validity to our critics, and likely the end to many convention contracts as just one consequence.
@Docca27@FuroFur If they refuse to acknowledge the problematic nature of being attracted to organisms that cannot consent under any circumstances, then that point becomes null and void. Also, shunning these people who are proudly zoophilic is important because...
@Docca27@FuroFur It's the wording. They emphasize the inability to control zoophilic tendencies, which is only partially true. Zoophilia is usually the result of some kind of repressed trauma, and if said zoo actually goes to therapy to unpack that, then there's some validity. HOWEVER:
@PupKynaois@FuroFur And in that culpability, and refusal to unpack *why* you're attracted to an inability to consent? You open yourself to ridicule and shunning. Especially in a community that already has an unfair reputation for "deviancy", you should be shunned and loudly.